한･미 고등학교 중국어 교재 비교 분석
A Comparative Analysis of High School Chinese Textbooks between Korea and USA
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Textbooks are even a more influential teaching material than any other ones in schools. There is therefore the necessity for the continuous quality control of textbooks. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between Korean and American Chinese textbooks in high school and to make recommendations as to which be more suitable for the Korean-Chinese learner. For this purpose, each textbook was analyzed based on the following two steps: holistic analysis, deep analysis of tasks. First step, the study assessed and analyzed the textbooks holistically by Chinese textbook evaluation criteria for selecting which is composed of five evaluation categories: curriculum, content, student, teacher, appearance system. Second, the tasks of each textbook are analyzed by the five criteria of deep analysis based on Littlejohn's criteria. The present study suggested the ways to figure out effective and systematic methods of Chinese teaching and studying, based on comparison and analysis of high school Chinese textbooks of Korea and America.
Abstract
Textbooks are even a more influential teaching material than any other ones in schools. There is therefore the necessity for the continuous quality control of textbooks. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between Korean and American Chinese textbooks in high school and to make recommendations as to which be more suitable for the Korean-Chinese learner. For this purpose, each textbook was analyzed based on the following two steps: holistic analysis, deep analysis of tasks. First step, the study assessed and analyzed the textbooks holistically by Chinese textbook evaluation criteria for selecting which is composed of five evaluation categories: curriculum, content, student, teacher, appearance system. Second, the tasks of each textbook are analyzed by the five criteria of deep analysis based on Littlejohn's criteria. The present study suggested the ways to figure out effective and systematic methods of Chinese teaching and studying, based on comparison and analysis of high school Chinese textbooks of Korea and America.
참고문헌 (23)
- Chang Un-hyo, "Informative Evaluation Model for Textbook Develop- ment", A Journal of Education, 9 (1989)
- Chen Fu, "Learn Chinese with Me" (2003), People's Education Press
- Choi Jae-young, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Chunjae Textbook
- Choi Kyu-bal, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Parkyoungsa
- Ellis, R, "Task-based Language Learning and Teaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Im Seung-kyu, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Darakwon
- Jiaying Howard, "Huan Ying" (2009), Cheng&Tsui Company
- 김정은, "중등학교 중국어 교과서 선정을 위한 평가기준 개발 연구", 중국학연구, (67), pp.187~210 (2014), 중국학연구회
- Kim Jung-leol, "An Analysis of Singapore's Primary School English Textbooks", A Study of Education, 10 (2006)
- 김정민, "영어 교재 분석 평가의 사례", 영어어문교육, 13(4), pp.233~252 (2007), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Kim Nan-mi, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Parkyoungsa
- Kwon Bok-hee, "A Comparative Study of High School Chinese Textbooks between Korea and Japan", pp.2005
- Littlejohn, A, "Materials Development in Language Teaching" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- No Kyung-ok, "A Comparative Study Between Korean and American Chinses Textbook in High School", pp.2007
- Nunan, D, "Task-based Language Teaching A comprehensively revised edition of Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Park Heung-su, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Kyohaksa
- Park Young-ho, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Nexus Chinese
- Park Duk-jun, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Chunjae Education
- Shumang Fredlein, "Ni Hao" (1991), ChinaSoft
- Sim Young-chul, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Sisa Chinese
- Wu Yin-ho, "ChineseⅠ" (2012), Jungjin Press
- Yamin Ma, "Easy Steps to Chinese" (2006), Beijing Language and Culture University Press
- Yuehua Liu, "Intergrated Chinese" (1999), Cheng&Tsui Company