貰冊과 稅書: 전통시기 한국과 중국의 소설 대여와 독자
The Lending Library(貰冊 and 稅書): Book lending Services and Readers in Traditional era of Korea and China
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To modern people Sechaek(세책, 貰冊), book lending in traditional Korea, has features that provide fresh and interesting subject matter. That it had only been prevalent in Seoul, one of many cities at the time, the regular customers were women, who had to make up the living in houses, brought out there furnishings and made debts to participate, the contents were not that of housewives' morality but foul and therefore created anxiety of the ruling class, were enough aspects to focus on Sechaek, one of numerous historical events. This study started from the fact that this kind of book lending did exist in China in the name of ‘Seseo’. And only because it has not been receiving much of attention, the academy misconceived that the data of ‘Seseo’ seldom exist. And this study is trying to break its misunderstandings. ‘Seseo’ in China, unlike its cognition until now, in addition to Seseopo, the rental houses, existed in many forms such as 書船(Seoseon) and 貨郞(hwanang), which were book selling stalls. Furthermore, the user of Sechaek were not only in noble class but also in government officials, soldiers, merchants and lower class of people and this is the same in Chinese Seseo. Additionally, in the comparison in women only, it is very similar in many aspects except the class of readers and few special features in cultural aspects. Conclusionally, the reason for difference in propotion of studies in Sechaek and Seseo was the difference of publishing and press situations between the countries. In other words, we must not overlook the fact that Korean publishing was very limited compared to that of Chinese at the time. No matter the amount and area, the publishing, circulation and consumption of books in China grew explosively and on the other hand, those in Korea were not. The dependence of Sechaeck had to be high, and therefore it has been seen as a peculiar cultural phenomenon in Chosun Dynasty. However in China, it was just a natural part of circulation process because the distinction between buying the book and borrowing it was not necessary. Accordingly, we should acknowledge the fact that book lending in China did exist enough and expect follow-up studies for the explanation for the characterized and limited place called ‘Seoul’.
Abstract
To modern people Sechaek(세책, 貰冊), book lending in traditional Korea, has features that provide fresh and interesting subject matter. That it had only been prevalent in Seoul, one of many cities at the time, the regular customers were women, who had to make up the living in houses, brought out there furnishings and made debts to participate, the contents were not that of housewives' morality but foul and therefore created anxiety of the ruling class, were enough aspects to focus on Sechaek, one of numerous historical events. This study started from the fact that this kind of book lending did exist in China in the name of ‘Seseo’. And only because it has not been receiving much of attention, the academy misconceived that the data of ‘Seseo’ seldom exist. And this study is trying to break its misunderstandings. ‘Seseo’ in China, unlike its cognition until now, in addition to Seseopo, the rental houses, existed in many forms such as 書船(Seoseon) and 貨郞(hwanang), which were book selling stalls. Furthermore, the user of Sechaek were not only in noble class but also in government officials, soldiers, merchants and lower class of people and this is the same in Chinese Seseo. Additionally, in the comparison in women only, it is very similar in many aspects except the class of readers and few special features in cultural aspects. Conclusionally, the reason for difference in propotion of studies in Sechaek and Seseo was the difference of publishing and press situations between the countries. In other words, we must not overlook the fact that Korean publishing was very limited compared to that of Chinese at the time. No matter the amount and area, the publishing, circulation and consumption of books in China grew explosively and on the other hand, those in Korea were not. The dependence of Sechaeck had to be high, and therefore it has been seen as a peculiar cultural phenomenon in Chosun Dynasty. However in China, it was just a natural part of circulation process because the distinction between buying the book and borrowing it was not necessary. Accordingly, we should acknowledge the fact that book lending in China did exist enough and expect follow-up studies for the explanation for the characterized and limited place called ‘Seoul’.
참고문헌 (28)
- Association for Research on Ancient Korean Novel, "Writing and Propagation of Ancient Korean Novel" (1994), Asia munhuasa
- Cho, Dong-Il, "Korea Literature Syntax Ⅲ" (2005), Knowledge Industry
- Cho, Dong-Il, "Theory of Comparative Social history of novel Ⅱ" (2002), Knowledge Industry
- Cho, Hae-Ran, "The Study on the Reading Experiences of Women in Chosun Dynasty", The Korean Cultural Studies, 8 (2005)
- Cho, Yoon-Jea, "History of Korean literature" (1981), Tamgudang
- 최수경, "19세기 前期 중국 通俗小說 출판의 양상과 소설 독자에 관한 연구", 중국소설논총, (37), pp.151~178 (2012), 한국중국소설학회[DOI]
- Chung Kil-Soo, "The Emerging path and the method of full length novelization of the 17th century Korean novels", doctor, pp.2005
- 정명기, "세책본소설의 유통양상-동양문고 소장 세책본소설에 나타난 세책장부를 중심으로-", 고소설연구, (16), pp.3~100 (2003), 한국고소설학회
- Courant, Maurice, "Bibliographie Core’enne" (1995), Bumwoosa
- Guo, Meng-Liang, "Book ship: Case Analysis Jiangnan book trade, Vol.5" (2009), China Publishing
- 洪尙勳, "전통시기 강남지역에서 독서시장의 형성과 변천― 소설 작품의 생산과 유통을 중심으로 ―", 중국문학, 41, pp.129~146 (2004), 한국중국어문학회
- Huanglin, "中國歷代小說論著選: Articles and Writings Selection in the Ancient Chinese History" (2000), Jiangxi Renmin Chubanshe
- 전상욱, "세책 대출자의 특성에 대한 연구 -동양문고본 대출장부를 중심으로-", 고소설연구, (26), pp.239~274 (2008), 한국고소설학회
- 정병설, "조선후기 한글소설의 성장과 유통 - 세책과 방각을 중심으로 -", 진단학보, (100), pp.263~297 (2005), 진단학회
- 강종임, "전통시기 중국의 소설 대여와 그 한계", 중국어문학, (66), pp.111~138 (2014), 영남중국어문학회
- Kim Yong-Su, "Jaques Lacan" (2008), Sallim
- Lee, Duk-Mu, "SaSojeal(士小節): Tradition Courtesy of Korean" (1993), MyungMunDang
- Lee, Min-Hee, "A study on the Relation between book-brokers and distribution of old novels general books in a period of the 16th~19th centuries" (2007), Yeokrak
- Lee, Yoonsuk, "Rental Library Manuscript of Old Novels" (2003), HyeAn
- Ling, Qi-Chao, "飮氷室文集" (1992), SeoKyungMunhuasa
- "Bookstore during Ming Qing period" (2006)[URL]
- Pan, Jian-Guo, "Ming and Qing period popular fiction readers and dissemination", The Jounal of Fudan University, 1 (2001)
- 박소현, "소설 중독: 전통시기 중국과 한국의 여성 독자", 중국문학, 53, pp.115~143 (2007), 한국중국어문학회
- Shi, Chang-Yu, "Qing Dynasty destroyed ban on behalf of fiction", The Journal of Shanghai Teachers College, 39 (2010)
- Sun, Wen-Jie, "Qing Dynasty book circulation channels of communication", Library and Information, 6 (2012)
- Wang, Li-Qi, "元明淸三代禁毁小說戱曲史料: YuanMingQing three generations ban ruined historical fiction and drama" (1981), Shanghai Guji Chubanshe
- Xie, De-Hui, "書林淸話" (2011), Blue History
- Yun, Dae-Seok, "A Psychological Reading of Choi In-Hun's Novels", Korean Studies, 16 (2007)