An Argumentative Approach to Too in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Traditionally, too has been treated as a trigger of an existential presupposition. Hence, the particle in the sentence Jeff joined the race, too is responsible for the presupposition ‘There is a person other than Jeff who joined the race.’ This analysis, however, is inadequate for handling a wide variety of cases involving diverse types of focus the particle can be associated with. It is necessary for the lexicon of too to specify how the focus particle constrains the immediate context. Adopting the theory of argumentation, the present study proposes two conditions as part of the semantic contents of too: the Co-Support Condition and the Parity Condition. The former constrains the context by having the proposition expressed by the sentence or clause containing too and the proposition expressed by the preceding sentence or clause to support a contextually relevant conclusion in unison. The latter makes sure that the two propositions are on a par with each other. Enriching the lexical contents of too in this way helps capture the semantic contribution of the focus particle as a relational operator.
Abstract
Traditionally, too has been treated as a trigger of an existential presupposition. Hence, the particle in the sentence Jeff joined the race, too is responsible for the presupposition ‘There is a person other than Jeff who joined the race.’ This analysis, however, is inadequate for handling a wide variety of cases involving diverse types of focus the particle can be associated with. It is necessary for the lexicon of too to specify how the focus particle constrains the immediate context. Adopting the theory of argumentation, the present study proposes two conditions as part of the semantic contents of too: the Co-Support Condition and the Parity Condition. The former constrains the context by having the proposition expressed by the sentence or clause containing too and the proposition expressed by the preceding sentence or clause to support a contextually relevant conclusion in unison. The latter makes sure that the two propositions are on a par with each other. Enriching the lexical contents of too in this way helps capture the semantic contribution of the focus particle as a relational operator.
참고문헌 (8)
- Asher, N., "Logics of Conversation" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Bach, K, "Default Reasoning : Jumping to Conclusions and Knowing When to Think Twice", Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65, pp.37~58 (1984)
- Ducrot, O., "Les Échelles Argumentatives" (1980), Les Edítions de Minuit
- Fauconnier, G, "Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 6, pp.353~375 (1975)
- Kay, P, "Even", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13(1), pp.59~111 (1990)
- Koenig, J., "Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap" (1998), Center for the Study of Language and Information
- Lambrecht, K., "Information Structure and Sentence Form" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Mann, W. C., "Rhetorical Structure Theory : Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization", Text, 8(3), pp.243~281 (1988)
