본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象とした協同に対する認 識の研究 - 協同作業․ディスカッションイメージ·ディスカッションスキルを中心に

Belief in Cooperation Study that Targets Native Korean Learners - Focused on cooperative work, discussion image, discussion skill

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Belief in Cooperation Study that Targets Native Korean Learners - Focused on cooperative work, discussion image, discussion skill Ishizuka Ken A survey targeting learners who study Japanese as a foreign language in Korean universities was conducted using “The Belief in Cooperation Scale,” developed by Yasunaga (2006) to clarify whether the concept of cooperative learning is an appropriate educational approach for Japanese learners whose mother tongues are Korean and how they perceive an image and a skill related to cooperative learning while having a ‘conversation.’ In addition to the survey, which is the original method of this study, an interview, qualitative research, was conducted at the same time to analyze and consider the learners’ perception from different perspectives by quoting specific situations and cases. After researching students’ tendencies, I cannot deny that there were differences by individual. The aggregate method can be averaged, but research that clarifies individual properties more specifically needs to be implemented. For that research, in addition to quantitative data, a class can be set up which introduces cooperative learning and observes the learners’ changes and the progress in the learners’ belief by researching repeatedly over time. Interviews, qualitative research, which target learners who are weighted towards high scores and low scores respectively, can be conducted as well. As a result, unexpectedly, the learners’ answers were mostly in the categories of ‘Harmony,’ ‘Motivation,’ ‘Cooperation,’ and ‘Initiative,’ and less in ‘Level Difference,’ ‘Grade Difference,’ and ‘Gender Difference.’ They speak up and directly express honest opinions while showing a tendency to avoid a leader’s role. Also, they consider vertical relationships and gender differences less than expected, but depend highly on higher level classmates. Based on this result, when designing a class, teachers need to fully grasp through the methods of a questionnaire survey, learning perception research, and preliminary interviews, a balance between learners, especially for those who do not get along with each other. However, from time to time, a positive learning atmosphere is not formed, even between close learners, and an adjustment will be needed.

Abstract

Belief in Cooperation Study that Targets Native Korean Learners - Focused on cooperative work, discussion image, discussion skill Ishizuka Ken A survey targeting learners who study Japanese as a foreign language in Korean universities was conducted using “The Belief in Cooperation Scale,” developed by Yasunaga (2006) to clarify whether the concept of cooperative learning is an appropriate educational approach for Japanese learners whose mother tongues are Korean and how they perceive an image and a skill related to cooperative learning while having a ‘conversation.’ In addition to the survey, which is the original method of this study, an interview, qualitative research, was conducted at the same time to analyze and consider the learners’ perception from different perspectives by quoting specific situations and cases. After researching students’ tendencies, I cannot deny that there were differences by individual. The aggregate method can be averaged, but research that clarifies individual properties more specifically needs to be implemented. For that research, in addition to quantitative data, a class can be set up which introduces cooperative learning and observes the learners’ changes and the progress in the learners’ belief by researching repeatedly over time. Interviews, qualitative research, which target learners who are weighted towards high scores and low scores respectively, can be conducted as well. As a result, unexpectedly, the learners’ answers were mostly in the categories of ‘Harmony,’ ‘Motivation,’ ‘Cooperation,’ and ‘Initiative,’ and less in ‘Level Difference,’ ‘Grade Difference,’ and ‘Gender Difference.’ They speak up and directly express honest opinions while showing a tendency to avoid a leader’s role. Also, they consider vertical relationships and gender differences less than expected, but depend highly on higher level classmates. Based on this result, when designing a class, teachers need to fully grasp through the methods of a questionnaire survey, learning perception research, and preliminary interviews, a balance between learners, especially for those who do not get along with each other. However, from time to time, a positive learning atmosphere is not formed, even between close learners, and an adjustment will be needed.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 이시즈카 켄, "JFL環境の韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象としたピア・レスポンスの研究 - 質問紙調査の分析から見る協働学習の成功要因と授業デザインの可能性 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(18), pp.423~446 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  2. 이시즈카 켄, "韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象としたジグソー学習法による読解授業の試み", 일어일문학, (44), pp.183~201 (2009), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
  3. 이시즈카 켄, "ピア・リーディングによる読解授業の問題点を探る -JFL環境で学ぶ韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象とした実践を通して-", 일어일문학, (47), pp.171~187 (2010), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
  4. 이시즈카 켄, "JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスの研究 - ビリーフ調査および中国人学習者との比較 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(28), pp.451~467 (2011), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  5. 이시즈카켄, "JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスの研究 - 話し合いの言語およびグループを中心に -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(31), pp.75~92 (2012), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  6. 石塚健, "JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスにおける学習者の意識の研究 -グループ内のレベル差の観点から-", 동북아 문화연구, 1(43), pp.285~302 (2015), 동북아시아문화학회
  7. 石塚健, "韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象としたピア·ラーニングにおけるレベル別の学習者の学びに対する意識 - 上級者の学びを中心に -", 일어일문학, (69), pp.177~193 (2016), 대한일어일문학회
  8. 石塚建, "韓国語母語話を対象にしたピア․ラーニングにおけ るペアおよびグループ内の問題の実態と学習意識 - インタビュー調査を中心に -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(48), pp.285~304 (2016), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  9. 이시즈카 켄, "韓国語母語話者を対象としたピア․ラーニングにおける学習形態の違いに対する学習者の意識 - 教室空間とグループ編成を中心に -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(50), pp.257~273 (2017), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  10. 関山聡之, "ペアを固定化したピア․レスポンスに対するビリーフ調査-韓国語母語話者の場合-", 比較文化研究, (89), pp.93~104 (2009), 日本比較文化学会
  11. 長濱文与, "協同作業認識尺度の開発", 教育心理学研究, (57), pp.24~37 (2009), 日本教育心理学会
  12. 広瀬和佳子, "母語によるピア․レスポンス(peer response)が推敲作文におよぼす効果-韓国人中級学者を対象とした3ヶ月間の授業活動をとおして-", 言語文化と日本語教育, (19), pp.24~37 (2000), お茶の水女子大学日本言語文化学研究会 お茶の水女子大学
  13. 房賢嬉, "韓国人中級日本語学習者を対象とした発音協働学習の試み-発音ピア․モニタリング活動の可能性と課題―", 日本語教育, (144), pp.157~168 (2010), 日本語教育学会
  14. 安永悟, "実践․LTD話し合い学習法", pp.64~70 (2006), ナカニシヤ出版
  15. 安永悟, "活動性を高める授業づくり -協同学習のすすめ", 14~19 (2012)
  16. 安永悟, "ディスカッション․スキル尺度の開発, 久留米大学文学部紀要, 人間科学科編12․13号 久留米大学文学部", 43~58 (1998)
  17. 安永悟, "ディスカッション․イメージ尺度の再検討, 久留米大学文学部紀要, 人間科学科編12․13号 久留米大学文学部", 33~41 (1998)
  18. 安永悟, "ディスカッション․スキル運用能力と思考動機との関係, 久留米大学文学部紀要, 人間科学科編 14号 久留米大学文学部", 63~73 (1999)
  19. 李英淑, "韓国の高校における作文授業の現状と改善策-済州外国語高等学校でのピア推敲活動を通して-", 日本言語文化研究会論集, (4), pp.33~60 (2008), 日本言語文化研究会

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)