南京國民政府 初期 自由主義 敎育思想의 實驗 ― 蔡元培의 大學院制․大學區制 ―
The experiment of liberal ideology of education in the beginning of Nanjing Nationalist Government - The ideological ministry of education and the district system of university by Ts'ai Yuan-pei -
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the period of Nanjing Nationalist Government, carrying out a system of the board of education and the district of university was an experiment based on liberalism which was pushed ahead in educational part. The three goals that Ts'ai Yuan-pei pursued through the system were, to propagate scientific research and method, to foster the custom of labor, and to arouse an interest for arts. Among these, generalization of science and art (when the scientification aims just, wealth and power country, the distribution of art is to be learned the value of mentality and the beauty of nature) was an esthetic education among five educational goals that Ts'ai Yuan-pei, the Minister of Education in the early Republic, suggested in 「an opinion about a course of education」(「對於敎育方針之意見」). In this article, he insisted that it should be separated with educations subject to and not subordinate to politics, and an educationalist should transcend the boundary of nation and pursue universal values for the future. Thus, he claimed that the ultimate goal of education is the human evolution and that the things lead the evolution are scientific research, artistic work, and the mind of "Sacrifice oneself for the good of many people"(舍己爲群). In this way, he tried to transplant the universal value to chinese students for the future. Also, the goal for fostering custom of labor is based on the 'sacred labor' already advocated in 5.4 movement. It was to break down the tradition that the intellectuals influenced by Confucianism made light of manual labor. it can be said that there were influences of Anarchists participated in the educational reform as well. The district system of the board of education and university was not only a big experiment to realize the educational ideal but also an important reform against old structure to achieve educational and academical independence. In practical, however, this ideal of Ts'ai Yuan-pei, as he pointed in 「Statement about the system of the ministry of education」(「關于大學院組織之談話」), had a limitation from its birth because it was progressed in a hurry by Ts'ai Yuan-pei, Li Shih-tseng, Wu Chih-hui who were once absorbed in Anarchism when Nanjing Government was focused on military affairs to conquer the north so that it couldn't afford to support national education. After the success of the expedition Kuomintang soon took a policy which rules over China by the party itself(以黨治國), and emphasized a unification of ideologies. However, Ts'ai Yuan-pei’s liberal ideology intended independent education against politics and it was reflected to the district system of the board of education and university. Educational independence and the academic freedom can't coexist with 黨治思想, an idea of governing the country by Kuomintang. Education cannot but subordinate by politics under the idea and the governor would take education under his control. It can be said that the people in the party who criticized the district system kept the idea in mind. 14th of August, 1928, in the fifth general meeting of Kuomindang, the party reorganized a government based on Sun wen's 「The general principle for founding a country」(「建國大綱」) and resurrected ministry of education. Ts'ai Yuan-pei noticed that the board system wouldn't maintain no longer and therefore, resigned. After the revoke of Ts'ai Yuan-pei’s board system, the district system was kept up in a hard way. However the blames were becoming severely because of followings. First, the district system of university which aimed to internalize the administrative organs of education into school itself couldn't pass over government officials' class-consciousness. Secondly, the president of university had huge managing works. Thirdly, a social recognition that the principle who was in charge of compilation of the budget laid disproportionate emphasis on university in the distribution of educational budget caused intense discontents among secondary schools. The conflict between Ts'ai Yuan-pei and Li Shih-tseng which was caused by naming Beijing University and Peiping district of university was also the reason for the reproach. However these are unessential problems and it can be improved through the enforcement of the system. The problem was that as Kuomintang defined the idea of governing China by itself(以黨治國, one-party rule), the experiment of liberal education should stop in China. Furthermore, an elder statesman, Ts'ai Yuan-pei who had a hatred for and rejected military clique and Communism thoroughly couldn't deny Sun wen's ruling principle. Afterwards, as a director of central institute, he devoted to research and cultivation of men talented. 1920's when nationalism was overflowing the period and absorbed by dictatorship of either the Left and the Right, liberalism was always outsider in every part of society. Nevertheless it cannot be concluded that the ideal of liberalists had failed because that the love for humanity of sacrifice(舍己爲群), customization of labor and scientification, distribution of art which can enlighten people to experience the value of mental world and the beauty of nature are Ts'ai Yuan-pei's educational ideals and these are universal values which the Chinese at the present days should pursue.
Abstract
In the period of Nanjing Nationalist Government, carrying out a system of the board of education and the district of university was an experiment based on liberalism which was pushed ahead in educational part. The three goals that Ts'ai Yuan-pei pursued through the system were, to propagate scientific research and method, to foster the custom of labor, and to arouse an interest for arts. Among these, generalization of science and art (when the scientification aims just, wealth and power country, the distribution of art is to be learned the value of mentality and the beauty of nature) was an esthetic education among five educational goals that Ts'ai Yuan-pei, the Minister of Education in the early Republic, suggested in 「an opinion about a course of education」(「對於敎育方針之意見」). In this article, he insisted that it should be separated with educations subject to and not subordinate to politics, and an educationalist should transcend the boundary of nation and pursue universal values for the future. Thus, he claimed that the ultimate goal of education is the human evolution and that the things lead the evolution are scientific research, artistic work, and the mind of "Sacrifice oneself for the good of many people"(舍己爲群). In this way, he tried to transplant the universal value to chinese students for the future. Also, the goal for fostering custom of labor is based on the 'sacred labor' already advocated in 5.4 movement. It was to break down the tradition that the intellectuals influenced by Confucianism made light of manual labor. it can be said that there were influences of Anarchists participated in the educational reform as well. The district system of the board of education and university was not only a big experiment to realize the educational ideal but also an important reform against old structure to achieve educational and academical independence. In practical, however, this ideal of Ts'ai Yuan-pei, as he pointed in 「Statement about the system of the ministry of education」(「關于大學院組織之談話」), had a limitation from its birth because it was progressed in a hurry by Ts'ai Yuan-pei, Li Shih-tseng, Wu Chih-hui who were once absorbed in Anarchism when Nanjing Government was focused on military affairs to conquer the north so that it couldn't afford to support national education. After the success of the expedition Kuomintang soon took a policy which rules over China by the party itself(以黨治國), and emphasized a unification of ideologies. However, Ts'ai Yuan-pei’s liberal ideology intended independent education against politics and it was reflected to the district system of the board of education and university. Educational independence and the academic freedom can't coexist with 黨治思想, an idea of governing the country by Kuomintang. Education cannot but subordinate by politics under the idea and the governor would take education under his control. It can be said that the people in the party who criticized the district system kept the idea in mind. 14th of August, 1928, in the fifth general meeting of Kuomindang, the party reorganized a government based on Sun wen's 「The general principle for founding a country」(「建國大綱」) and resurrected ministry of education. Ts'ai Yuan-pei noticed that the board system wouldn't maintain no longer and therefore, resigned. After the revoke of Ts'ai Yuan-pei’s board system, the district system was kept up in a hard way. However the blames were becoming severely because of followings. First, the district system of university which aimed to internalize the administrative organs of education into school itself couldn't pass over government officials' class-consciousness. Secondly, the president of university had huge managing works. Thirdly, a social recognition that the principle who was in charge of compilation of the budget laid disproportionate emphasis on university in the distribution of educational budget caused intense discontents among secondary schools. The conflict between Ts'ai Yuan-pei and Li Shih-tseng which was caused by naming Beijing University and Peiping district of university was also the reason for the reproach. However these are unessential problems and it can be improved through the enforcement of the system. The problem was that as Kuomintang defined the idea of governing China by itself(以黨治國, one-party rule), the experiment of liberal education should stop in China. Furthermore, an elder statesman, Ts'ai Yuan-pei who had a hatred for and rejected military clique and Communism thoroughly couldn't deny Sun wen's ruling principle. Afterwards, as a director of central institute, he devoted to research and cultivation of men talented. 1920's when nationalism was overflowing the period and absorbed by dictatorship of either the Left and the Right, liberalism was always outsider in every part of society. Nevertheless it cannot be concluded that the ideal of liberalists had failed because that the love for humanity of sacrifice(舍己爲群), customization of labor and scientification, distribution of art which can enlighten people to experience the value of mental world and the beauty of nature are Ts'ai Yuan-pei's educational ideals and these are universal values which the Chinese at the present days should pursue.
참고문헌 (64)
- 蔡元培, "蔡元培自述", 60~ (1985)
- 蔡元培, "與 國聞周報 記者的談話", ~
- 高平叔, "蔡元培全集 第五卷", 中華書局, ~ (1988)
- 蔡元培, "蔡元培自述", pp.136~ (2004), 河南人民出版社
- 孫常煒, "蔡元培先生全集" (1976), 臺灣商務印書館
- 黃世暉, "蔡孑民先生傳略", ~
- 高平叔, "蔡孑民先生傳略 下", ~
- 陶英惠, "蔡元培年譜", ~
- 孫常煒, "蔡元培先生年譜傳記" (1986), 國史館
- 孫常煒, "蔡元培先生年譜" (1997), 遠流
- 陶英惠, "蔡元培與大學院, 中央硏究院近代史硏究集刊3-上" (1972), 中央硏究院
- 高平叔, "蔡元培年譜" (1980), 中華書局
- 高平叔, "蔡元培全集" (1988), 中華書局
- 高平叔, "蔡元培年譜長篇 上․中․下" (1996), 人民敎育出版社
- "蔡元培自述" (2004), 河南人民出版社
- 沈善烘, "蔡元培選集" (1992), 浙江敎育出版社
- 李丹萍, "蔡元培的敎育獨立改革, 敎育硏究", 四川大學歷史文化學院, ~ (2006)
- 叢菜娥, "蔡元培的敎育理念與科敎興國", 山東省農業管理幹部學院學報, 23(5) (2007), 濟南山東省農業管理學院
- 王瑜, "蔡元培 敎育獨立議 新論", 寶鷄文學學院學報, 22(3) (2002), 寶鷄文學學院
- 張珊珍, "蔡元培政治思想淺論", 信陽師範學院學報, ~ (1996)
- 唐振常, "蔡元培傳", pp.198~199 (1999), 上海人民出版社
- 周天度, "蔡元培傳", 331~332
- 蔡元培, "新年夢", pp.439~450 (1977), 臺灣商務印書館
- 周天度, "蔡元培傳", pp.287~288 (1984), 北京人民出版社
- 蔡元培, "與 國聞周報 記者的談話", pp.58~
- 蔡元培, "粵寧漢之分裂與中央特別委員會成立經過情形", pp.816~
- 蔡元培, "讀書與救國", pp.122~123
- 蔡元培, "犧牲學業損失與失國土相等", pp.867~
- "附, 北京大學致蔡元培電"
- 蔡元培, "蔡元培自述", 139~
- 李劍農, "中國近百年政治史 下", pp.54~ (1977), 臺灣商務印書館
- 蔣介石, "蔣介石致蔡元培函", pp.102~103 (1926)
- 孫常煒, "蔡元培先生年譜傳記", pp.867~ (1986), 國史館
- "中國國民党擧行淸党前中央監察委員會在上海開會之記錄", 革命文獻, 17, pp.128~
- 李雲漢, "從容共到淸党", pp.611~ (1972), 臺灣商務印書館
- 李雲漢, "從容共到淸党", 611~
- "年譜傳記", 880~
- 肖效欽, "中國革命史上․下冊", pp.130~131, 紅旗出版社
- 茅家琦, "中國國民黨史 上冊", pp.402~, 鷺江出版社
- 郭廷以, "中華民國史事日誌 第二冊", 中央硏究院 近代史硏究所, ~ (1984)
- 蔡元培, "對於敎育方針之見解", pp.454~455
- 田正平, "留學生與中國敎育近代化", pp.212~213 (1994), 廣東敎育出版社
- 孫培靑, "中國敎育史", pp.603~ (1993), 華東師範大學出版社
- 大村興道, "蔡元培, 中國の思想", 東京大學 中國哲學硏究室, 789~ (1964)
- 金貞和, "蔡元培의 北京大學改革(一)", 中國史硏究, 8, pp.134~ (2002)
- 蔡元培, "我在北京大學之經驗, 蔡元培自述", 28~
- 張玉法, "中國現代政治史論", pp.145~170 (1988), 東華書局
- "北京國立學校 敎育經費獨立運動 紀, 舒新城, 近代中國敎育史料 第三冊", 149~
- "國立八校校長呈敎育部總長文", pp.162~
- "北京大學日刊 第969號", ~ (1922)
- 蔡元培, "敎育獨立議", pp.177~178
- 金貞和, "蔡元培의 북경대학 개혁(二)", 湖西史學, 43, pp.238~244 (2006), 湖西史學會
- 蔡元培, "大學院公報 發刊詞", pp.194~
- 蔡元培, "關於大學院組織之談話", pp.216~
- 蔡元培, "全國敎育會議開會詞", pp.228~
- 蔡元培, "對於敎育方針之意見", pp.452~
- 胡適, "附一, 胡適致蔡元培函", pp.163~
- "在大學院所發廢止春秋祀孔舊典的通令", pp.207~
- "年譜傳記 中冊", 995~
- 沈雲龍, "有關蔡元培生平的幾項補充", 傳記文學, 31(3)
- 周天度, "蔡元培傳", 336~337
- "敎育雜誌", 20(8)
- "申報", ~ (1928)
- 張玉法, "中國現代政治史論" (1988), 東華書局
