본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1920년대 초 자유주의 지식인들의 정치 활동 -‘胡適의 ‘努力정치’와 蔡元培의 ‘不合作정치’ -

The political campaign of liberal intellectuals in the early 1920. - Hu Shih’s politics of endeavor for the clean politics and Tsai Yuan-Pei’s politics which denied to collaborate -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

China is soaring up in economy after latter half of 20th century. centering around capitalism, the socialism which has the specific character of China was settled within the country in the late of 1990, and now China is the third biggest trading country in the world. The worry that China is faced nowadays is that it can't be governed the country by under the government's direction only. For example it can't be possible to manage the huge economy or foreign trades, or to restrict business activities of companies without establishing a law. Furthermore, it reaches to the difficult situation to deal with venting desire of individuals for the democracy and freedom which accompanies with affluent in economy. I thas been a task to embody the constitutional government and now i tis the urgent problem. At the 15th party convention in 1997, Chinese communist party adopted “administration in the conformi y with the Constitution" as a new policy for governing, and in 2004 the government published the general ideas which arranged concrete plan for embodiment of a constitutional state. For the situation in China in these days, it began to look back positively on the intellectuals who were also a liberalists Hu Shih and Ts`ai Yuan-Pei who endeavored to take root the constitutional government in China since the early 1920s. This paper is focused on the Ts`ai Yuan-Pei, Hu Shih's political ideology and movement of liberalism. In this period it can be said that their political activities can be explained as collaboration. In Declarations of the current situation such as ‘Our Political Opinion' and ‘A declaration for urging Sun Yat-sen's resigning his public post', Hu Shih prepared drafts and Ts`ai Yuan-Pei supported Hu Shih's idea. They discussed together and were active as leaders. 7th of May 1922, Hu Shih launched a political review 『The endeavor』and got his stride into criticize the problems within China. The motive for him to came out to political activities as a scholar was to reform the depraved politics of military cliques, and to take a stand against communism which insisted revolution by using violence and solution of the foundation and which attracted concerns of many intellectuals and young students. What he couldn't bear was the way of struggles of classes of Marxism. What he thought about this concept was that it tried to manage the political system of restriction and disapproval by using violence and compelling force. In second issue of 『The endeavor』 he printed ‘Our Political Opinion' which suggested liberal political ideology of West for the first time in China, and claimed minimal rights to military cliques. The principle of political idea of western liberalism was a power structure which was equipped with checks and balances within the Constitution. It was also process not to reform fundamentally but to investigate each problems and resolve these specifically. It was an attempt of pragmatism in the politics. Later, based on this opinion, Hu Shih tried constantly to settle the idea of liberal politics in China. Although he took different attitude from Hu Shih, Ts`ai Yuan-Pei was also the representative intellectual who believed liberalism. Compared to Hu Shih's activity, the political activity of Ts`ai Yuan-Pei was not to spread the liberalism itself into China, but to support educational environment on the ground of the nation salvation with education. In the situation of Ts`ai Yuan-Pei, by means of reformism, it could be planned stability in politics, cultivated talented people and upsurged morality in China. Based on this, he intended to develop the country. However when 羅文幹 who joined the ministry which was formed by liberalists, including Hu Shih, who participated in 'Our Political Opinion' was falsely arrested of a bribery scandal, this time Ts`ai Yuan-Pei protested against the depraved government, resigned his post, announced the declaration and left Beijing. In the declaration, he demanded morality of statesmen. Hu Shih supported Ts`ai Yuan-Pei's attitude by writing a article which defended Ts`ai Yuan-Pei positively. Hu Shih defined Ts`ai Yuan-Pei's principle of declaration as a denunciation against ‘助紂爲虐’(which means to participate in the dictatorship with serving the tyrant 紂 who is the symbol of a despot), supported him by saying that “a person who claims justice shouldn't help depraved government, and a upright scholar, official and journalist prosecuted that we are committing the crime in this depraved military clique" and evaluated that “the behavior of Ts`ai Yuan-Pei urged the reflection of the people and was able to make an impact on the our long spell of paralyzed senses." In this way, the liberal intellectuals in the beginning of 1920's cried against the violent revolution of communists directly, suggested parliamentarism, constitutionalism and decentralism which are the principles of western liberalism to the statesmen and attempted to these concepts to take root in China. Furthermore, demanding morality of politicians, they brought the people to an awareness and through this activity they planned reforming of politics and national salvation.

Abstract

China is soaring up in economy after latter half of 20th century. centering around capitalism, the socialism which has the specific character of China was settled within the country in the late of 1990, and now China is the third biggest trading country in the world. The worry that China is faced nowadays is that it can't be governed the country by under the government's direction only. For example it can't be possible to manage the huge economy or foreign trades, or to restrict business activities of companies without establishing a law. Furthermore, it reaches to the difficult situation to deal with venting desire of individuals for the democracy and freedom which accompanies with affluent in economy. I thas been a task to embody the constitutional government and now i tis the urgent problem. At the 15th party convention in 1997, Chinese communist party adopted “administration in the conformi y with the Constitution" as a new policy for governing, and in 2004 the government published the general ideas which arranged concrete plan for embodiment of a constitutional state. For the situation in China in these days, it began to look back positively on the intellectuals who were also a liberalists Hu Shih and Ts`ai Yuan-Pei who endeavored to take root the constitutional government in China since the early 1920s. This paper is focused on the Ts`ai Yuan-Pei, Hu Shih's political ideology and movement of liberalism. In this period it can be said that their political activities can be explained as collaboration. In Declarations of the current situation such as ‘Our Political Opinion' and ‘A declaration for urging Sun Yat-sen's resigning his public post', Hu Shih prepared drafts and Ts`ai Yuan-Pei supported Hu Shih's idea. They discussed together and were active as leaders. 7th of May 1922, Hu Shih launched a political review 『The endeavor』and got his stride into criticize the problems within China. The motive for him to came out to political activities as a scholar was to reform the depraved politics of military cliques, and to take a stand against communism which insisted revolution by using violence and solution of the foundation and which attracted concerns of many intellectuals and young students. What he couldn't bear was the way of struggles of classes of Marxism. What he thought about this concept was that it tried to manage the political system of restriction and disapproval by using violence and compelling force. In second issue of 『The endeavor』 he printed ‘Our Political Opinion' which suggested liberal political ideology of West for the first time in China, and claimed minimal rights to military cliques. The principle of political idea of western liberalism was a power structure which was equipped with checks and balances within the Constitution. It was also process not to reform fundamentally but to investigate each problems and resolve these specifically. It was an attempt of pragmatism in the politics. Later, based on this opinion, Hu Shih tried constantly to settle the idea of liberal politics in China. Although he took different attitude from Hu Shih, Ts`ai Yuan-Pei was also the representative intellectual who believed liberalism. Compared to Hu Shih's activity, the political activity of Ts`ai Yuan-Pei was not to spread the liberalism itself into China, but to support educational environment on the ground of the nation salvation with education. In the situation of Ts`ai Yuan-Pei, by means of reformism, it could be planned stability in politics, cultivated talented people and upsurged morality in China. Based on this, he intended to develop the country. However when 羅文幹 who joined the ministry which was formed by liberalists, including Hu Shih, who participated in 'Our Political Opinion' was falsely arrested of a bribery scandal, this time Ts`ai Yuan-Pei protested against the depraved government, resigned his post, announced the declaration and left Beijing. In the declaration, he demanded morality of statesmen. Hu Shih supported Ts`ai Yuan-Pei's attitude by writing a article which defended Ts`ai Yuan-Pei positively. Hu Shih defined Ts`ai Yuan-Pei's principle of declaration as a denunciation against ‘助紂爲虐’(which means to participate in the dictatorship with serving the tyrant 紂 who is the symbol of a despot), supported him by saying that “a person who claims justice shouldn't help depraved government, and a upright scholar, official and journalist prosecuted that we are committing the crime in this depraved military clique" and evaluated that “the behavior of Ts`ai Yuan-Pei urged the reflection of the people and was able to make an impact on the our long spell of paralyzed senses." In this way, the liberal intellectuals in the beginning of 1920's cried against the violent revolution of communists directly, suggested parliamentarism, constitutionalism and decentralism which are the principles of western liberalism to the statesmen and attempted to these concepts to take root in China. Furthermore, demanding morality of politicians, they brought the people to an awareness and through this activity they planned reforming of politics and national salvation.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 閔斗基, "중국에서의 자유주의 실험-胡適 (1891-1962)의 사상과 활동" (1996), 지식산업사
  2. 張曉萌, "胡適自由主義與中國現代社會進程", 理論學習, 6 (2008)
  3. 劉志國, "“問題與主義之爭”中的胡適思想及對當代文化建設的啓示", 山東社會科學, 1 (2006)
  4. 耿雲志, "胡適思想的現代的意義", 學術探索, 2 (2006)
  5. 楊萌芽, "傳承與斷裂:梁啓超與胡適思想之若干比較", 蘭州學刊, 9 (2006)
  6. 李明, "胡適思想2005年硏究綜術", 昭通師範高等專科學校學報, 29(3) (2007)
  7. 徐希軍, "角色衝突:胡適思想多技性的一介社會學解釋", 安徽大學學報-哲學社會科學版, 29(1) (2005)
  8. 胡適, "我的岐路", 努力週報, (7) (1922)
  9. 傅豊誠, "理想與實證的結合 in: 胡適的政治思想 in: 自由主義", pp.365~367 (1980), 時報出版公司
  10. 張曉唯, "蔡元培與胡適(1917-1937)", pp.193~ (2003), 中國人民大學出版社
  11. 蔡元培, "蔡元培自述", pp.138~ (2004), 河南人民出版社
  12. 김정화, "국민혁명기 채원배의 정치적 지향과 반공청당 활동", 사림, (27), pp.293~323 (2007), 수선사학회
  13. 耿雲志, "胡適年譜", pp.78~ (1986), 中華書局香港分局
  14. "蔡元培의 5·4운동에 대한 支持와 道旁兒의 갈등", 史林, (25) (2006), 首善史學會
  15. 曹伯言, "胡適日記 3", pp.660~662 (2001), 安徽敎育出版社
  16. 胡適, "發刊辭", 努力週報, (1) (1922)
  17. 耿雲志, "胡適年譜", 68~69
  18. 胡適, "胡適文選", pp.26~ (1985), 遠東圖書公司
  19. 周天度, "蔡元培傳", pp.279~, 新潮社
  20. 呂芳上, "從學生運動到運動學生", pp.191~195 (1994), 中央硏究院近代史硏究所
  21. "國立八校校長呈敎育部總長文", 北京大學日刊, (969)
  22. "國立八校校長呈大總統文", 北京大學日刊, (1070)
  23. 張玉法, "中國現代政治史論", pp.156~157 (1988), 東華書局
  24. 朱洪, "胡適與北大文友", pp.70~71 (2007), 湖北人民出版社
  25. 胡適, "這一週", 努力週報, (30) (1922)
  26. 宗淹, "關於 '我們的政治主張' 的討論」 (續)", 努力週報, (7) (1922)
  27. 梅祖芬, "關於 '我們的政治主張' 的討論", 努力週報, (4) (1922)
  28. 胡適, "後努力歌", 努力週報, (4) (1922)
  29. 李劍農, "民國統一問題", 努力週報, (11) (1922)
  30. 孫常煒, "蔡元培先生年譜傳記", pp.617~, 國史館
  31. 胡適, "對王內閣的要求", 努力週報, (15) (1922)
  32. W.G.T, "假使我們做了今日的國務總理", 努力週報, (20)
  33. 胡適, "吳佩孚與聯省自治", 努力週報, (15) (1922)
  34. 沉茗, "五四後胡適之‘努力’政治 in: 五四論集", pp.378~379 (1980), 成文出版社
  35. 朱洪, "陳獨秀與胡適", pp.174~176 (2005), 人民出版社
  36. 趙慶元, "蔡元培傳", pp.172~ (1998), 安徽出版社
  37. 蔡元培, "向大總統辭北大校長職呈", ~ (1923)
  38. 高平叔, "蔡元培全集 第四券", pp.309~ (1984), 中華書局
  39. 朱洪, "胡適與北大文友", 22~
  40. 蔡元培, "辭北京大學校長聲名", 蔡元培全集, 4, pp.309~
  41. 蔡元培, "關於不合作宣言", 蔡元培全集, 4, pp.311~312 (1923)
  42. 陳獨秀, "評蔡校長宣言", 響導, 17 (1923)
  43. 胡適, "蔡元培以辭職爲抗", 努力週報, (38) (1923)
  44. 胡適, "蔡元培是消極嗎", 努力週報, (39) (1923)
  45. 胡適, "蔡元培的 ‘不合作主義’", 努力週報, (39) (1923)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)