신라 興德王代 체제 정비와 金庾信 追封 ― 三韓一統意識 출현의 일 배경 ―
Institutional Revisions that were made during Shilla King Heungdeok-wang(興德王)’s reign, and the Bestowal of a Posthumous title for Kim Yu Shin(金庾信) - How the notion of “the Three Han entities had been one all along(三韓一統意識)” appeared -
0
조회
0
다운로드
30
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Examined in this study is what kind of governmental institutions were revised and how they were changed during the reign of King Heungdeok-wang, as well as why Kim Yu Shin was posthumously entitled as the “Great Heungmu King(興武大王)” at the time, as these events could have served as a platform which bred the future notion of “the Three Han entities had been one all along(三韓一統意識)” in the mid-9th century inside the Shilla society. The insurrection of Kim Heon Chang(金憲昌) and his son seriously disrupted the stability of the Shilla society, and caused a crisis of a dynastic scale. After the insurrection was subdued, king Heungdeok-wang newly established more local military installations to prevent such incident from happening again, and tried to appease the public himself. In the meantime, with the intention of reinforcing the Golpum structure(骨品制) of the society, he initiated institutional revisions as well. And as a symbolic gesture, he decided to honor Kim Yu Shin with a posthumous title, trying to build an atmosphere in which all Shilla could unite. The time of entitlement is presumed to have been the 9th year of king Heungdeok-wang’s reign, when a series of institutional revisions were simultaneously being launched. In his biographical record[行錄], authored in the early days of the Hadae(下代) period, Kim Yu Shin was described as the hero of the Unification war, who literally led the unification, and also as a symbol of dynastic unity. A posthumous title was intended to use his such image in actually bringing the country together. And such decision could have created an environment in which people would remember the unification process and form a belief that would grow in the minds of future generations that the three countries were meant to eventually become one.
Abstract
Examined in this study is what kind of governmental institutions were revised and how they were changed during the reign of King Heungdeok-wang, as well as why Kim Yu Shin was posthumously entitled as the “Great Heungmu King(興武大王)” at the time, as these events could have served as a platform which bred the future notion of “the Three Han entities had been one all along(三韓一統意識)” in the mid-9th century inside the Shilla society. The insurrection of Kim Heon Chang(金憲昌) and his son seriously disrupted the stability of the Shilla society, and caused a crisis of a dynastic scale. After the insurrection was subdued, king Heungdeok-wang newly established more local military installations to prevent such incident from happening again, and tried to appease the public himself. In the meantime, with the intention of reinforcing the Golpum structure(骨品制) of the society, he initiated institutional revisions as well. And as a symbolic gesture, he decided to honor Kim Yu Shin with a posthumous title, trying to build an atmosphere in which all Shilla could unite. The time of entitlement is presumed to have been the 9th year of king Heungdeok-wang’s reign, when a series of institutional revisions were simultaneously being launched. In his biographical record[行錄], authored in the early days of the Hadae(下代) period, Kim Yu Shin was described as the hero of the Unification war, who literally led the unification, and also as a symbol of dynastic unity. A posthumous title was intended to use his such image in actually bringing the country together. And such decision could have created an environment in which people would remember the unification process and form a belief that would grow in the minds of future generations that the three countries were meant to eventually become one.
참고문헌 (55)
- "三國史記", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "三國史節要", ~
- "東國通鑑", ~
- 韓國古代社會硏究所, "譯註韓國古代金石文" (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 한국역사연구회, "譯註羅末麗初金石文" (1996), 혜안
- 김영하, "新羅中代社會硏究" (2007), 一志社
- 노태돈, "삼국통일전쟁사" (2009), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 이강래, "三國史記 典據論" (1996), 民族社
- 李基東, "新羅社會史硏究" (1997), 一潮閣
- 윤경진, "高麗史 地理志의 分析과 補正" (2012), 여유당출판사
- 姜文植, "權近의 歷史認識과 歷史敍述", 韓國學報, 117 (2004)
- 金甲童, "百濟遺民의 動向과 羅末麗初의 公州", 역사와역사교육, 3 (1999)
- 金東洙, "新羅 憲德 興德王代의 改革政治", 韓國史硏究, 39 (1982)
- 김병곤, "신라 헌덕왕대의 副君 秀宗의 정체성과 太子", 동국사학, (55), pp.183~223 (2013), 동국역사문화연구소
- 김병남, "신라의 삼국통일 의식과 그 실제", 한국사상과 문화, (24), pp.145~174 (2004), 한국사상문화학회
- 金相鉉, "統一期의 新羅 社會 硏究" (1987), 東國大學校 新羅文化硏究所
- 金瑛河, "新羅의 百濟統合戰爭과 體制變化", 韓國古代史硏究, 16 (1999)
- 김영하, "一統三韓의 실상과 의식", 한국고대사연구, (59), pp.293~327 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 김영하, "新羅統一論의 궤적과 함의", 한국사연구, (153), pp.37~75 (2011), 한국사연구회
- 김창겸, "흥무대왕 김유신연구" (2011), 경인문화사
- 金台植, "金庾信의 興武大王 추봉 시기", 新羅史學報, 6 (2006)
- 김호범, "신라 흥덕왕대의 청해진 설치 배경", 역사학연구, (29), pp.57~86 (2007), 호남사학회
- 盧泰敦, "三韓에 대한 認識의 變遷", 韓國史硏究, 38 (1982)
- 노태돈, "7세기 전쟁의 성격을 둘러싼 논의", 한국사연구, (154), pp.329~345 (2011), 한국사연구회
- 文喆永, "權近의 東國史略", 史學志, 20 (1986)
- 박용국, "新羅 憲德王代 金憲昌의 亂과 晉州地域", 퇴계학과 유교문화, (37), pp.249~283 (2005), 퇴계연구소
- 배종도, "新羅下代의 地方制度 개편에 대한 고찰", 學林, 11 (1989)
- 邊太燮, "三國統一의 民族史的 意味 : ‘一統三韓’意識과 관련하여", 新羅文化, 2 (1985)
- 申瀅植, "三國統一의 歷史的 性格", 韓國史硏究, 61･62 (1988)
- 윤경진, "고려전기 界首官의 운영체계와 기능", 동방학지, (126), pp.31~62 (2004), 국학연구원
- 윤경진, "『三國史記』 地理志 수록 군현의 三國 分屬", 韓國史學報, (47), pp.35~74 (2012), 고려사학회[DOI]
- 윤경진, "｢청주운천동사적비｣의 건립 시기에 대한 재검토", 사림, (45), pp.107~140 (2013), 수선사학회
- 윤경진, "新羅 太宗(武烈王) 諡號 논변에 대한 자료적 검토 - 原典에 대한 이해를 중심으로 -", 역사와 실학, (51), pp.5~41 (2013), 역사실학회
- 윤경진, "新羅 中代 太宗(武烈王) 諡號의 追上과 재해석", 韓國史學報, (53), pp.213~252 (2013), 고려사학회
- 윤경진, "三韓 인식의 연원과 통일전쟁기 新羅의 天下觀", 동방학지, (167), pp.95~131 (2014), 국학연구원
- 윤경진, "신라 통일기 금석문에 나타난 天下觀과 歷史意識: 三韓一統意識의 성립 시기 고찰", 사림, (49), pp.177~216 (2014), 수선사학회
- 尹載云, "新羅 下代 鎭의 再檢討", 史學硏究, 58ㆍ59 (1999)
- 이강래, "『삼국사기』의 삼국인식", 韓國史學報, (41), pp.39~68 (2010), 고려사학회
- 李基東, "신라 흥덕왕대의 정치와 사회", 國史館論叢, 21 (1991)
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究" (1974), 一潮閣
- 이현태, "新羅 中代 新金氏의 登場과 그 背景", 한국고대사연구, (42), pp.231~272 (2006), 한국고대사학회
- 이호영, "신라 삼국통일에 관한 재검토 : 통일의식을 중심으로", 史學志, 15 (1981)
- 李昊榮, "新羅의 統一意識과 ‘一統三韓’ 意識의 成長", 東洋學, 26 (1996)
- 全德在, "新羅 下代 鎭의 設置와 性格", 軍史, 35 (1997)
- 鄭求福, "三國史節要 대한 史學史的 考察", 歷史敎育, 18 (1975)
- 鄭求福, "東國史略에 對한 史學史的 考察", 歷史學報, 68 (1975)
- 조범환, "新羅 下代 憲德王의 副君 설치와 그 정치적 의미", 진단학보, (110), pp.31~54 (2010), 진단학회
- 주보돈, "新羅 下代 金憲昌의 亂과 그 性格", 한국고대사연구, (51), pp.233~279 (2008), 한국고대사학회
- 채미하, "신라 국가제사와 왕권" (2008), 도서출판 혜안
- 채미하, "신라 흥덕왕대의 정치와 儀禮", 신라문화, 42, pp.291~314 (2013), 신라문화연구소
- 최홍조, "新羅 哀莊王代의 政治改革과 그 性格", 한국고대사연구, (54), pp.301~366 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 韓永愚, "東國通鑑의 歷史敍述과 歷史認識(上ㆍ下)", 韓國學報, 15ㆍ16 (1979)
- 한준수, "신라 中ㆍ下代 鎭·道·府의 설치와 체제 정비", 한국학논총, 31, pp.349~387 (2009), 한국학연구소
- 黃善榮, "新羅 下代 金憲昌 亂의 性格", 釜山史學, 35 (1998)