근대 서양 국제법의 ‘자결권’과 1919년 파리강화회의의 ‘민족자결’
Self-Determination of Modern International Law and ‘Self-Determination of Peoples’ at Paris Peace Conference
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Colonial peoples’ ambition for national independence was stimulated by the fact that Paris Peace Conference was held based on Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points which included ‘self-determination of peoples’. But national self-determination at Paris Peace Conference did not receive a full consideration by the imperial international power politics and neglected. Nevertheless, Peace treaty combined with Covenant of the League of Nations made the article no 22 stipulate that the ultimate purpose of mandatory rule was to lead territories of mandatorily ruled be self-determinate in the name of ‘sacred trust of civilization.’ This is the reason that the declaration of self-determination of peoples during World War I and Paris Peace Conference have important meaning in the history of national self-determination. Mandatory rule at Paris Peace Conference was to defer self-determination and self-determination of peoples for the colonialized people. But the acknowledgement in the Covenant of the League of Nations that non-annexation was a general rule of the mandatory rule and self-determination was a ultimate goal of the mandatory rule system meant that Western advanced countries (“Family of Nations”) could not neglect self-determination of peoples any more. This shows a change in viewpoint about self-determination before and after the World War, which became a basis for colonial peoples to claim self-determination.
Abstract
Colonial peoples’ ambition for national independence was stimulated by the fact that Paris Peace Conference was held based on Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points which included ‘self-determination of peoples’. But national self-determination at Paris Peace Conference did not receive a full consideration by the imperial international power politics and neglected. Nevertheless, Peace treaty combined with Covenant of the League of Nations made the article no 22 stipulate that the ultimate purpose of mandatory rule was to lead territories of mandatorily ruled be self-determinate in the name of ‘sacred trust of civilization.’ This is the reason that the declaration of self-determination of peoples during World War I and Paris Peace Conference have important meaning in the history of national self-determination. Mandatory rule at Paris Peace Conference was to defer self-determination and self-determination of peoples for the colonialized people. But the acknowledgement in the Covenant of the League of Nations that non-annexation was a general rule of the mandatory rule and self-determination was a ultimate goal of the mandatory rule system meant that Western advanced countries (“Family of Nations”) could not neglect self-determination of peoples any more. This shows a change in viewpoint about self-determination before and after the World War, which became a basis for colonial peoples to claim self-determination.
참고문헌 (43)
- 미국사연구회, "미국 역사의 기본 사료" (1992), 소나무
- 外務省, "日本外交年表竝主要文書, 上" (1965), 日本外務省
- Arthur S. Link, "The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, vol. 45. 1917-1918" (1966), Princeton University Press
- "U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of United States 1915", U. S. Department of State, ~ (1915)
- "U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of United States 1918, Supl. I", U. S. Department of State, ~ (1918)
- "U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations, Paris Peace Conference, 1919, Vol. I", U.S.Department of State, ~ (1919)
- 加藤陽子, "근대 일본의 전쟁논리" (2003), 태학사
- 김대순, "국제법론" (2017), 삼영사
- 김성윤, "코민테른과 세계혁명 I" (1986), 거름
- 野澤豊, "아시아민족운동사" (1988), 백산서당
- 이기택, "국제정치사" (2000), 일신사
- 전상숙, "일제시기 한국 사회주의 지식인 연구" (2004), 지식산업사
- 전상숙, "한국인의 근대 국가관, ‘민주공화국’ 재고 : 식민지시기 국가의 이중성과 민족문제의 상관관계를 중심으로" (2017), 선인
- 피에르 르누벵, "제1차 세계대전" (1985), 탐구당
- R. Koselleck, "지나간 미래" (1998), 문학동네
- W.Z. 포스터, "세계사회주의운동사-제1, 2, 3 인터내셔널의 역사" (1988), 동녘
- 堀川武夫, "極東國際政治史序說-21個條要求の硏究" (1958), 有斐閣
- 金東勳, "人權･自決權と現代國際法" (1979), 新有堂
- 池井優, "三訂 日本外交史槪說" (1992), 慶應通信
- Cobban, Alfred, "民族國家と民族 自決" (1978), 早稻田大學出版部
- Brownlie, I., "Principles of Public International Law" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Cassese, Antonio, "Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal" (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Francis, Paul, "Walters, A History of the League of Nations" (1952), Oxford University Press
- Mayer, Arno J., "Political Origins of the New Diplomacy, 1917-1918" (1970), Yale University Press, Vintage Books
- Service, Elman R., "Origins of the State and Civilization" (1975), Norton
- Thompson, John M., "Russia, Bolshevism, and the Versailles Peace" (1966), Princeton University Press
- Roy W. Curry, "Woodrow Wilson and Far Eastern Policy 1918-1921", pp.157~161 (1957), Bookman Associates
- Umozurike Oji Umozurike, "Self-Determination in International Law" (1972), Hamden, Conneticut, Archon Books
- Young, E. P., "The Presidency of Yuan Shih-kai, Michigan" (1977), University of Michigan Press
- 박상섭, "근대 주권 개념의 발전과정", 세계정치, 25(1) (2004)
- 오시진, "<학위논문 소개>근대 국제법상 문명론에 대한비판적 고찰", 국제법평론, (41), pp.243~254 (2015), 국제법평론회
- 유재형, "자결권의 생성과 발전에 관한 연구", 법학논집, 13 (1998)
- 이서희, "국제법상 식민주의와 위임통치제도", 국제법평론, (50), pp.135~166 (2018), 국제법평론회
- 이성덕, "국제법상 자결권의 개념과 그 형성과정", 국제법학회논총, 48(1), pp.8~246 (2003), 대한국제법학회
- 전상숙, "제 1차 세계대전 이후 국제질서의 재편과 민족 지도자들의 대외 인식", 한국정치외교사논총, 26(1), pp.313~350 (2004), 한국정치외교사학회
- 전상숙, "파리강화회의와 약소민족의 독립문제", 한국근현대사연구, (50), pp.7~36 (2009), 한국근현대사학회
- 프란크 볼드윈, "삼･일운동 50주년 기념논집" (1969), 동아일보사
- 松井芳郞, "民族の基本的權利" (1973), 法律文化社
- 太壽堂鼎, "岩波講座 現代法I: 現代國際法の展開", 岩波書店
- 田畑茂二郞, "現代國際法の諸問題: 三･一 植民地體制の崩壞と民族自決權", 法學セミナ, (186) (1971)
- Anghie, Anthony, "Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions : Sovereignty, Economy, and the Mandate System of the League of Nations", New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (2002)
- Lenin, V. I., "The Lenin Anthology" (1975), W.W. Norton & Company
- Q. Skinner, "Political Innovation and Conceptual Change" (1989), Cambridge Univ. Press