신라 中古期 骨制의 성립과 운영
Establishment and Management Medieval(中古期) of Silla Dynasty's Gol(骨) system
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Golpum system was the unique form of the status system in the Silla dynasty in Korea. It was a typical ancient Korean society's status system which has been investigated field in the academia. In particular, a kinship system, which is composed of Seong-gol and Jin-gol, is the most hottest issue in the Korean academic circles. However, there is a no point of agreement whether Seong-gol was the reality or not, and concerning about its management and times. This research has a purpose to investigate how the status system established and guaranteed in the society. The Buddism has attracted public attention as a theoretical basis of the status system. The Samkuksagi (The chronics of the three nations) described the Buddism as a state religion while it did not focus on the myths about the Buddism. We assume that the Buddism was the meaningful political controller in the Silla dynasty. Seong-gol was regarded as the royal familiy, and it was available when the King had the superiority over the nobility. The Kings of Sylla dynasty had been called the Great King with a qualifier ‘saint’ when the Buddism instituted a state religion. It means that Seong-gol (the saunt family) was established based on the Buddism. Jin-gol also entered a field of history similar times to Seong-gol, and both two terminologies was established the same period in terms of the Buddism terminology. Seong-gol guaranteed a royal family's prestige through the change of ennoble system Galmun King and the use of the Great King title. The King's brother, who were Seong-gol, secured the superiority over the nobility by getting the title of ennoblement. The Kings also solidified their status through the ennoble system, and they monopolized political power because the kings restrained the right of succession only kings heirs. Jin-gol also guaranteed their political prestige after established Daedeung. The House of Lords in Silla dynasty limited the qualification only who had the title of Daedeung. Jin-gol class took the reins of the nobility through only Jin-gol getting the title of Daedeung.
Abstract
The Golpum system was the unique form of the status system in the Silla dynasty in Korea. It was a typical ancient Korean society's status system which has been investigated field in the academia. In particular, a kinship system, which is composed of Seong-gol and Jin-gol, is the most hottest issue in the Korean academic circles. However, there is a no point of agreement whether Seong-gol was the reality or not, and concerning about its management and times. This research has a purpose to investigate how the status system established and guaranteed in the society. The Buddism has attracted public attention as a theoretical basis of the status system. The Samkuksagi (The chronics of the three nations) described the Buddism as a state religion while it did not focus on the myths about the Buddism. We assume that the Buddism was the meaningful political controller in the Silla dynasty. Seong-gol was regarded as the royal familiy, and it was available when the King had the superiority over the nobility. The Kings of Sylla dynasty had been called the Great King with a qualifier ‘saint’ when the Buddism instituted a state religion. It means that Seong-gol (the saunt family) was established based on the Buddism. Jin-gol also entered a field of history similar times to Seong-gol, and both two terminologies was established the same period in terms of the Buddism terminology. Seong-gol guaranteed a royal family's prestige through the change of ennoble system Galmun King and the use of the Great King title. The King's brother, who were Seong-gol, secured the superiority over the nobility by getting the title of ennoblement. The Kings also solidified their status through the ennoble system, and they monopolized political power because the kings restrained the right of succession only kings heirs. Jin-gol also guaranteed their political prestige after established Daedeung. The House of Lords in Silla dynasty limited the qualification only who had the title of Daedeung. Jin-gol class took the reins of the nobility through only Jin-gol getting the title of Daedeung.
참고문헌 (78)
- 葛城末治, "新羅葛文王に就いて", 東洋學報, 13 (1924)
- 金基興, "新羅의 聖骨", 歷史學報, 164 (1999)
- 김병곤, "진평왕의 즉위와 지증왕계 인물의 동향", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.301~336 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 金庠基, "葛文王攷", 震檀學報, 5 (1936)
- 今西龍, "新羅 骨品考", 史林, 7 (1921)
- 今西龍, "新羅骨品聖而考", ~ (1925)
- 金永萬, "影印冷水里新羅碑의 言語學的 考察", 韓國古代史硏究, 3 (1990)
- 김영하, "新羅 中代의 儒學受容과 支配倫理", 한국고대사연구, (40), pp.137~180 (2005), 한국고대사학회
- 金瑛河, "韓國古代社會의 軍事와 政治" (2002), 高大民族文化硏究院
- 金哲埈, "新羅 上代社會의 Dual Organization", 歷史學報 (1952)
- 金羲滿, "新羅의 衣冠制 와 骨品制", 慶州史學, 27 (2008)
- 김병곤, "진평왕의 즉위와 지증왕계 인물의 동향", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.301~336 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 김영하, "新羅中代社會硏究" (2007), 일지사
- 김창호, "고신라 금석문의 연구" (2007), 서경문화사
- 盧鏞弼, "新羅 眞興王代 ‘大等’의 分化와 그 政治的 背景-昌寧 眞興王巡狩碑 會集人名의 大等관계 부분의 분석을 중심으로", 歷史學報, 127 (1990)
- 盧鏞弼, "新羅眞興王巡狩碑硏究" (1996), 一潮閣
- 노중국, "금석문 목간 자료를 활용한 한국고대사 연구 과제와 몇 가지 재해석", 한국고대사연구, (57), pp.5~44 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 盧重國, "迎日 冷水里碑, In 譯註 韓國古代金石文 2" (1992)
- 盧泰敦, "蔚珍鳳新羅碑와 新羅의 官等制", 韓國古代史硏究, 2 (1989)
- 末松保和, "新羅中古王代考", 新羅史の諸問題 (1954)
- 末松保和, "新羅史の諸問題" (1954), 東洋文庫
- 木村誠, "6世紀新羅における骨品制の成立", 歷史學硏究, 428 (1976)
- 武田幸男, "新羅骨品制の再檢討", 東洋文化硏究所紀要 (1975)
- 文暻鉉, "新羅王族의 骨制", 大丘史學, 11 (1976)
- 文暻鉉, "迎日冷水里碑에 보이는 部의 性格과 政治運營問題", 韓國古代史硏究, 3 (1990)
- 文暻鉉, "迎日冷水里新羅碑에 보이는 部의 性格과 政治運營 問題", 韓國古代史硏究, 3 (1990)
- 三池賢一, "新羅官位制度 上", 法政史學, 22 (1970)
- 三品彰英, "骨品制社會", 古代史講座, 7 (1963)
- 三品彰英, "三國遺事考證 1" (1975)
- 서의식, "新羅 ‘上代’ 葛文王의 冊封과 聖骨", 역사교육, (104), pp.1~48 (2007), 역사교육연구회
- 徐毅植, "新羅 上代의 王位繼承과 聖骨", 韓國史硏究, 86 (1994)
- 宣石悅, "麻立干時期의 王權과 葛文王", 신라문화, (22), pp.375~393 (2003), 신라문화연구소
- 宣石悅, "新羅 骨品制의 成立基盤과 그 構造", 釜大史學, 11 (1987)
- 申東河, "新羅 骨品制의 成立過程", 韓國史論, 5 (1980)
- 申衡錫, "新羅 中古期 大等의 身分", 新羅學硏究, 5 (2001)
- 윤진석, "5∼6세기 신라 사탁부 갈문왕", 대구사학, 100, pp.31~59 (2010), 대구사학회
- 李基東, "新羅 奈勿王界의 血緣意識", 歷史學報 (1972)
- 李基東, "新羅骨品制社會와 花郞徒" (1984), 一潮閣
- 李基白, "上大等考", 歷史學報, 17 (1962)
- 李基, "新羅 初期 佛敎와 貴族勢力", 震檀學報, 40 (1975)
- 李基白, "丹陽赤城碑發見의 意義와 赤城碑 王敎事部分의 檢討", 史學志, 21 (1978)
- 李基白, "大等考", 歷史學報, 19 (1962)
- 李基白, "上大等考", 歷史學報, 17 (1962)
- 李基白, "新羅 六頭品 硏究", 省谷論叢 (1971)
- 李基白, "新羅 初期 佛敎와 貴族勢力", 震檀學報, 40 (1975)
- 李基白, "新羅時代의 葛文王", 歷史學報, 58 (1972)
- 李基白, "新羅時代의 葛文王", 歷史學報, 58 (1973)
- 李基白, "稟主考, In 李相佰博士回甲紀念論叢" (1964)
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究" (1974), 一潮閣
- 이인철, "新羅政治制度史硏究" (1993), 一志社
- 이종서, "新羅 中古期 ‘大等’의 語義와 性格", 신라문화, (31), pp.37~56 (2008), 신라문화연구소
- 李種旭, "新羅 中古時代의 聖骨", 震檀學報, 50 (1980)
- 李鍾旭, "新羅上代王位繼承硏究" (1980), 嶺南大學校出版部
- 李喜寬, "迎日 冷水里碑｣,에 보이는 至都盧葛文王에 대한 몇 가지 問題", 韓國學報, 60 (1990)
- 임범식, "신라 중고기 갈문왕과 상대등의 지위계승", 한성사학, 17 (2003)
- 전덕재, "7세기 중반 관직에 대한 관등규정의 정비와 골품제의 확립, In 한국고대의 신분제와 관등제" (2000), 아카넷
- 全德在, "新羅六部體制硏究" (1996), 一潮閣
- 田美姬, "新羅의 聖骨과 眞骨", 韓國史學報, 102 (1998)
- 鄭求福, "迎日冷水里新羅碑의 金石學的 考察", 韓國古代史硏究, 3 (1990)
- 井上秀雄, "新羅の骨品制度", 歷史學硏究, 304 (1965)
- 井上秀雄, "新羅政治體制の變遷過程", 古代史講座, 4 (1962)
- 新羅史基礎硏究, "井上秀雄", ~ (1974)
- 丁仲煥, "新羅聖骨考, In 李弘植博士回甲紀念論叢" (1969)
- 朱甫暾, "丹陽 赤城碑", 譯註 韓國古代金石文, 2 (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 朱甫暾, "三國時代 貴族과 身分制, In 韓國社會發展史論" (1992), 一潮閣
- 주보돈, "신라 骨品制 연구의 새로운 傾向과 課題", 한국고대사연구, (54), pp.5~42 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 朱甫暾, "新羅 中古期의 郡司와 村司", 韓國古代史硏究, 1 (1988)
- 朱甫暾, "新羅骨品制社會とその變化", 朝鮮學報, 196, pp.58~ (2005)
- 池內宏, "新羅の骨品制と王統", 東洋學報, 28 (1941)
- 河廷龍, "新羅上代 葛文王 硏究", 民族文化硏究, 27 (1997)
- 黃胤錫, "頤齋遺藁雜著華言方言字義解", ~
- "滿鮮史硏究 上世二冊" (1960), 座右堂刊行會
- "三國史記", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "新羅 骨品制社會와 花郞徒", ~ (1984)
- "新羅史硏究" (1933), 近澤書店
- "新羅政治社會史硏究" (1974), 一潮閣
- "新羅中代社會硏究" (2007), 일지사