본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독립협회와 만민공동회의‘근대성’ 논의 검토

The modernity problem of Independence Club and ‘People’s Assembly

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Public-private assembly and people's assembly which were interested by Korean political world in 1898 are understood as the first start of Korean democracy or the original form of civil society. But, this movement was progressed at the stage before forming modern ‘citizen’, so it cannot help being progressed like elites and pan-civil. Also, Korean fate hanged by a thread because of the attack of western imperialism powers, so we couldn't help showing the anti-attack characteristic. At the same time, we also couldn't help showing foreign power-depending characteristic. In addition, this movement is also the process forming modern people. Periodic complexity and citizen's immaturity in the late 1880s made movement of Independence Club and people's assembly complex and multi-layered. In spite of it, most of studies progressed till now were evaluated a little exaggeratedly, based on the Western modern concept. Most of the studies were mainly progressed in study's branches except for historical studies. Therefore, there were many cases the movement was progressed in the situation that relationship with political situation and other movement such as farmer movement, especially, the relationship with foreign powers, etc. at that time were not verified. However, those studies sufficiently verify that the appearance of Independence Club and people's assembly means the appearance of new political subject and new political movement. On the other hand, the truth of this movement's modernity (form and autonomy of modern subject, publicity problem, etc.) wasn't clearly established yet. For the studies of the future, it's necessary to reject to simplify this movement to problems if it's anti-public or not, if it's anti-people or not and if it's seen positively or negatively and focus on how those characteristics were combined and divided. Also, it's necessary to analyze the characteristics of modern subject formed newly in detailed and explain how the autonomy of modern movement was revealed, continued and cut.

Abstract

Public-private assembly and people's assembly which were interested by Korean political world in 1898 are understood as the first start of Korean democracy or the original form of civil society. But, this movement was progressed at the stage before forming modern ‘citizen’, so it cannot help being progressed like elites and pan-civil. Also, Korean fate hanged by a thread because of the attack of western imperialism powers, so we couldn't help showing the anti-attack characteristic. At the same time, we also couldn't help showing foreign power-depending characteristic. In addition, this movement is also the process forming modern people. Periodic complexity and citizen's immaturity in the late 1880s made movement of Independence Club and people's assembly complex and multi-layered. In spite of it, most of studies progressed till now were evaluated a little exaggeratedly, based on the Western modern concept. Most of the studies were mainly progressed in study's branches except for historical studies. Therefore, there were many cases the movement was progressed in the situation that relationship with political situation and other movement such as farmer movement, especially, the relationship with foreign powers, etc. at that time were not verified. However, those studies sufficiently verify that the appearance of Independence Club and people's assembly means the appearance of new political subject and new political movement. On the other hand, the truth of this movement's modernity (form and autonomy of modern subject, publicity problem, etc.) wasn't clearly established yet. For the studies of the future, it's necessary to reject to simplify this movement to problems if it's anti-public or not, if it's anti-people or not and if it's seen positively or negatively and focus on how those characteristics were combined and divided. Also, it's necessary to analyze the characteristics of modern subject formed newly in detailed and explain how the autonomy of modern movement was revealed, continued and cut.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 강만길, "대한제국의 성격", 창작과 비평, 13(2) (1978)
  2. 박성춘, "대한계년사 3", 248~
  3. 교과서 포럼, "한국 근현대사" (2008), 기파랑
  4. 김용섭, "서평-독립협회연구", 한국사연구, (12) (1976)
  5. 김용직, "개화기 한국의 근대적 공론장과 공론형성 연구 : 독립협회와 독립신문을 중심으로", 한국동북아논총, 11(38), pp.335~358 (2006), 한국동북아학회
  6. 김홍우, "<독립신문>과 사회계약, In 한국정치의 현상학적 이해" (2007), 인간사랑
  7. 낙성대경제연구소, "수량경제사로 다시 본 조선후기" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  8. 박찬승, "한국의 근대국가 건설운동과 공화제", 역사학보, (200), pp.305~344 (2008), 역사학회
  9. 서희경, "대한민국 건국헌법의 역사적 기원 (1898-1919):만민공동회?3.1운동?대한민국임시정부헌법의‘민주공화’정체 인식을 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 40(5), pp.139~163 (2006), 한국정치학회
  10. 신용하, "신판 독립협회연구(상) - 독립신문․독립협회․만민공동회의 사상과 운동" (2006), 일조각
  11. 신용하, "신판 독립협회연구(하) - 독립신문․독립협회․만민공동회의 사상과 운동" (2006), 일조각
  12. 왕현종, "한국 근대국가의 형성과 갑오개혁" (2003), 역사비평사
  13. 이원순, "서평-독립협회 연구", 한국학보, 2(1) (1976)
  14. 이정옥, "애국계몽기 연설과 토론의 수용 과정", 현대문학이론연구, (43), pp.175~197 (2010), 현대문학이론학회
  15. 이태진, "고종시대의 재조명" (2000), 태학사
  16. 이화여대 한국문화연구원, "근대계몽기 지식 새념의 수용과 그 변용" (2004), 소명출판
  17. 이화여대 한국문화연구원, "근대계몽기 지식의 발견과 사유 지평의 확대" (2006), 소명출판
  18. 이황직, "근대 한국의 초기 공론장 형성 및 변화에 관한 연구", 사회이론, (32), pp.63~92 (2007), 한국사회이론학회
  19. 장명학, "근대적 공론장의 등장과 정치권력의 변화:<독립신문> 사설을 중심으로", 한국정치연구, 16(2), pp.27~54 (2007), 사회과학연구원 한국정치연구소
  20. 정교, "대한계년사 3" (2004), 소명출판
  21. 정교, "대한계년사 4" (2004), 소명출판
  22. 주진오, "사회사상사적 독립협회 연구의 확립과 문제점 -신용하, 『독립협회 연구』를 중심으로-", 한국사연구, (149), pp.321~352 (2010), 한국사연구회
  23. 주진오, "해산 전후 독립협회 활동에 대한 각 계층의 반응 - 황실과 언론을 중심으로", 실학사상연구, 9 (1997), 무악실학회
  24. 주진오, "19세기 후반 개화 개혁론의 구조와 전개 – 독립협회를 중심으로-", 박사, 사학과, pp.1995
  25. 교수신문 기획, "고종황제 역사 청문회" (2005), 푸른역사
  26. "교수신문고종시대논쟁(대한제국논쟁)", ~
  27. "제국신문 1899년 5월 5일", ~ (1899)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)