본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고대 일본의 백제 망명귀족과 후손— 도혼(答本), 아사다노무라지(麻田連)씨 관계 기사를 중심으로 —

The Noblemen Exiled from Baekje and Descendents in Ancient Japan — Focused on the Articles Related to Touhon-shi, Asadanomuraji-shi —

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The noblemen exiled from Baekje, including Touhon-shunsho, were versatile with a broad range of knowledge and skills in not only military strategies but also in literature, medical science, and the philosophy of yin and yang. Since Touhon-youshun, a descendant of Touhon-shunsho, received the kabane of Asadanomuraji, the Asadanomuraji-shi, whose members ranged from Asadanomuraji-youshun to Asadanomuraji-kanahu, Asadanomuraji-karihu and Asadanomuraji-makiyo, were engaged in various fields in the 8th century, including documentation, accounting, medical science, and fortification on top of their primary mission in literary work. Moreover, they made both public and personal exchanges with the Hujiwara-shi and the Otomo-shi, who were the most highly valued clans throughout the Nara Period, reinforcing the foundation for the Asadanomuraji-shi’s advancement. However, the Asadanomuraji-shi, who were descendants of the noblemen exiled from Baekje, record in ShinsenShojiroku, King Jun of Gojoseon of Baekje as their progenitor. The change of Asadanomuraji-shi’s sisei and progenitor transmission is in line with the findings of the review made of the sisei and ancestral transmission of the noblemen exiled from Baekje. Therefore, it is argued that, after coming to Japan, the noblemen exiled from Baekje, with some variance in time, got transferred into Japanese order of ujikabane, and, while inheriting their origin as the noblemen exiled from Baekje, they also changed their progenitor transmission as being originated from the royal family of Baekje or China or as descendants of the Japanese emperor. This evidence indicates that, though kabane was not specified by law as the standard for the appointment of officials, it remained continuously influential in the officials’ society, just as office and rank served as beneficial elements for descendants by oni-sei. For this reason, the ‘noblemen exiled from Baekje’ created a pedigree to their advantage by changing their own origin with a revised progenitor.

Abstract

The noblemen exiled from Baekje, including Touhon-shunsho, were versatile with a broad range of knowledge and skills in not only military strategies but also in literature, medical science, and the philosophy of yin and yang. Since Touhon-youshun, a descendant of Touhon-shunsho, received the kabane of Asadanomuraji, the Asadanomuraji-shi, whose members ranged from Asadanomuraji-youshun to Asadanomuraji-kanahu, Asadanomuraji-karihu and Asadanomuraji-makiyo, were engaged in various fields in the 8th century, including documentation, accounting, medical science, and fortification on top of their primary mission in literary work. Moreover, they made both public and personal exchanges with the Hujiwara-shi and the Otomo-shi, who were the most highly valued clans throughout the Nara Period, reinforcing the foundation for the Asadanomuraji-shi’s advancement. However, the Asadanomuraji-shi, who were descendants of the noblemen exiled from Baekje, record in ShinsenShojiroku, King Jun of Gojoseon of Baekje as their progenitor. The change of Asadanomuraji-shi’s sisei and progenitor transmission is in line with the findings of the review made of the sisei and ancestral transmission of the noblemen exiled from Baekje. Therefore, it is argued that, after coming to Japan, the noblemen exiled from Baekje, with some variance in time, got transferred into Japanese order of ujikabane, and, while inheriting their origin as the noblemen exiled from Baekje, they also changed their progenitor transmission as being originated from the royal family of Baekje or China or as descendants of the Japanese emperor. This evidence indicates that, though kabane was not specified by law as the standard for the appointment of officials, it remained continuously influential in the officials’ society, just as office and rank served as beneficial elements for descendants by oni-sei. For this reason, the ‘noblemen exiled from Baekje’ created a pedigree to their advantage by changing their own origin with a revised progenitor.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. "三國史記", ~
  2. "日本書紀", ~
  3. "續日本紀", ~
  4. "日本後紀", ~
  5. "續日本後紀", ~
  6. "新撰姓氏錄", ~
  7. "瀤風藻", ~
  8. "萬葉集", ~
  9. "藤氏家傳", ~
  10. "大同類聚方", ~
  11. "三國志", ~
  12. 노중국, "백제부흥운동사" (2003), 일조각
  13. 이도학, "백제인물사" (2005), 주류성
  14. 佐伯有淸, "新撰姓氏錄硏究の硏究 本文篇" (1962), 吉川弘文館
  15. 佐伯有淸, "新撰姓氏錄硏究の硏究 考證篇 5" (1983), 吉川弘文館
  16. 中西進, "萬葉集の比較文學的硏究" (1963), 南雲堂櫻楓社
  17. 黒板勝美, "新增補國史大系 1下 日本書紀 後篇" (1967), 吉川弘文館
  18. 野村忠夫, "律令官人制の硏究" (1967), 吉川弘文館
  19. 石母田正, "日本の古代國家" (1971), 岩波書店
  20. 關晃, "岩波講座 日本歷史3 古代3" (1976), 岩波書店
  21. 胡口靖夫, "近江朝と渡來人" (1976), 雄山閣
  22. 靑木和夫, "新日本古典文學大系 續日本紀 2" (1990), 岩波書店
  23. 桃裕行, "上代學制の硏究" (1994), 思文閣出版
  24. 平野邦雄, "歸化人と古代國家" (1993), 吉川弘文館
  25. 田中卓, "田中卓著作集9" (1996), 國書刊行會
  26. 木﨑康弘, "鞠智城跡Ⅱ-論考編2-" (2014), 熊本縣敎育委員會
  27. 박윤선, "도일 백제 유민의 활동", 숙명한국사론, 2 (1996)
  28. 김영심, "6~7세기 삼국의 관료제 운영과 신분제- 衣冠制에 대한 검토를 기반으로 -", 한국고대사연구, (54), pp.85~138 (2009), 한국고대사학회
  29. 서보경, "고대 日本의 신지식 전수 방식의 변화와 특징 ―大學寮의 성립 과정을 중심으로―", 日本學(일본학), 38, pp.149~186 (2014), 일본학연구소
  30. 서보경, "8세기 秦氏의 씨족 分化와 官人化", 일본연구, (67), pp.103~128 (2016), 일본연구소[DOI]
  31. 서보경, "‘同祖’계보의 변화를 통해 본 王仁, 王辰爾系 씨족", 한일관계사연구, (53), pp.65~115 (2016), 한일관계사학회
  32. 서보경, "고대 일본의 文筆實務職과 한국계 「渡來」씨족", 사림, (59), pp.291~328 (2017), 수선사학회[DOI]
  33. 서보경, "고대 일본의 吉田氏 연구", 日本學(일본학), 45, pp.189~224 (2017), 일본학연구소[DOI]
  34. 서보경, "『新撰姓氏錄』의 吉田連氏 出自와 氏姓 標題에 관하여", 한일관계사연구, (58), pp.77~117 (2017), 한일관계사학회
  35. 서보경, "『新撰姓氏錄』의 原型과 편자의 편찬 태도", 한림일본학 (구 한림일본학연구), (32), pp.5~33 (2018), 일본학연구소[DOI]
  36. 서보경, "『新撰姓氏錄』의 편찬 자료와 勘校", 일본연구, (76), pp.7~35 (2018), 일본연구소[DOI]
  37. 박준형, "『大同類聚方』 典藥寮本과 고대 한반도 관련 처방", 木簡과 文字, (15), pp.223~285 (2015), 한국목간학회
  38. 연민수, "百濟 鬼室氏와 日本의 후예씨족", 백제학보, (17), pp.59~82 (2016), 백제학회[DOI]
  39. 정효운, "해외백제문화재 자료집 2 『일본 속의 백제-긴키지역』 Ⅱ" (2017), 충청남도역사문화연구원
  40. 지원구, "百濟 西方城의 位置와 性格", 백제문화, (58), pp.131~166 (2018), 백제문화연구소[DOI]
  41. 村尾次郞, "氏姓崩壞に現はれたる歸化人同族化の一形相", 史學雜誌, 52(8) (1941)
  42. 阿部武彦, "上代改賜姓の範圍について", 史學雜誌, 55(2) (1944)
  43. 田貞義, "梅花歌三十二首の成立事情", 萬葉, 57 (1965)
  44. 村田正男, "梅花歌の作者名について", 萬葉, 69 (1968)
  45. 高島正人, "奈良時代の麻田連氏-付答本氏-", 立正史學, 38 (1974)
  46. 胡口靖夫, "鬼室集斯墓碑をめぐって", 日本書紀硏究, 11 (1979), 塙書房
  47. 伊藤千浪, "律令制下の渡來人賜姓", 日本歷史, 442 (1985)
  48. 井手豊, "白村江の戰いと朝鮮式山城について", 歷史硏究, 422 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)