『新撰姓氏錄』에 기재된 鎭守將軍 후예 씨족의 出自改變
Sutuji-Kaihen of Clan of ChinsuShogun Written in Shinsensyoujiroku
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The situation and the details of Sutuji-kaihen(出自改變) was reviewed by reviewing the issue of KichitanoMuraji-Uji(吉田連氏) and ManonoOmi-Uji(眞野臣氏) classified as Koubetu(皇別) in Shinsensyoujiroku(『新撰姓氏錄』). I would close this article by summarizing the results of this study. First, the ancestor story of KichitanoMuraji-Uji that their ancestor stayed in Komon(己汶) area in Mimana(任那) as ChinsuShogun(Mikotomochi) with the order of SujinTenno(崇神天皇) and came back to Japan and the ancestor story of ManonoOmi-Uji that their ancestor stayed in Shilla(新羅) as Mikotomochi(宰) with the order of Jinguukougou(神功皇后) are not more than a fake story made up to show that their clans have a long history serving for Emperor making use of the record of Mimana tribute and Conquest of Shilla in Nihonsyoki(『日本書紀』). Therefore, it seems that the viewpoint on Korea shown in kaden(家傳) of KichitanoMuraji-Uji and ManonoOmi-Uji in Uji-Kabane(氏姓) Record has inherited the viewpoint of Nihonsyoki considering the Korean Peninsula as bannkoku(蕃國). Second, it is understood that KichitanoMuraji-Uji lived in Yamatono-Kuni(大和國) HusonokaminoKohori(添上郡), made relationships with descendants of Ametarasihikokuniosihitonomikoto(天足彦國忍人命), ancestor of Wani-Uji(和珥氏) through exchanges with various clans related to Wani, and changed their Uji as Koubetu. Additionally, KichitanoMuraji-Uji went to Japan in the time of Tenchitenno(天智天皇) and made active activities as family of officials with talents in medicine, pharmaceutics, and literature to Heian(平安) period. They built relationship with Wani related Ujis based on this and could change Sutuji as Koubetu. Additionally, in case of Manono-Uji, not only Sutuji but also Uji-Kabane were processed with complicated processes. ManonoObito-Uji who came from Mimana and lived in Oumino-Kuni(近江國) Sikano-Kohori(志賀郡) Manono-Mura(眞野村) changed Sutuji into Koubetu Uji through the process of Uji-Kabane to WanibenoOmi(和珥部臣,) and ManonoOmi(眞野臣). On the other hand, ManonoObito(眞野首) that moved from Manono area to Yamatono-Kuni(大和國) Sikinokamio-kohori(城上郡) Ohoichi(大市) inherited KurenoUtamai(伎樂舞) taking it as the family business and changed Uji name into OhoichinoObito(大市首) based on the name of the place they moved to. Unlike ManonoObito-Uji that emphasized the characteristics of clan claiming Mimana Sutuji within the scope of Han, there were ManonoMiyatuko-Uji(眞野造氏) changing Sutuji as descendent of Chogowang of Baekje and TaminoObito-Uji changing Sutuji as Baekje NurinoOmi(努利使主) of Baikje. Accordingly, it was found that Sutuji kaihen of KichitanoMuraji-Uji and Manono-Uji became different according to activities and residents of individual Ujis coming to Japan, Ujis that they had contacted based on the characteristics of Uji and Kabane.
Abstract
The situation and the details of Sutuji-kaihen(出自改變) was reviewed by reviewing the issue of KichitanoMuraji-Uji(吉田連氏) and ManonoOmi-Uji(眞野臣氏) classified as Koubetu(皇別) in Shinsensyoujiroku(『新撰姓氏錄』). I would close this article by summarizing the results of this study. First, the ancestor story of KichitanoMuraji-Uji that their ancestor stayed in Komon(己汶) area in Mimana(任那) as ChinsuShogun(Mikotomochi) with the order of SujinTenno(崇神天皇) and came back to Japan and the ancestor story of ManonoOmi-Uji that their ancestor stayed in Shilla(新羅) as Mikotomochi(宰) with the order of Jinguukougou(神功皇后) are not more than a fake story made up to show that their clans have a long history serving for Emperor making use of the record of Mimana tribute and Conquest of Shilla in Nihonsyoki(『日本書紀』). Therefore, it seems that the viewpoint on Korea shown in kaden(家傳) of KichitanoMuraji-Uji and ManonoOmi-Uji in Uji-Kabane(氏姓) Record has inherited the viewpoint of Nihonsyoki considering the Korean Peninsula as bannkoku(蕃國). Second, it is understood that KichitanoMuraji-Uji lived in Yamatono-Kuni(大和國) HusonokaminoKohori(添上郡), made relationships with descendants of Ametarasihikokuniosihitonomikoto(天足彦國忍人命), ancestor of Wani-Uji(和珥氏) through exchanges with various clans related to Wani, and changed their Uji as Koubetu. Additionally, KichitanoMuraji-Uji went to Japan in the time of Tenchitenno(天智天皇) and made active activities as family of officials with talents in medicine, pharmaceutics, and literature to Heian(平安) period. They built relationship with Wani related Ujis based on this and could change Sutuji as Koubetu. Additionally, in case of Manono-Uji, not only Sutuji but also Uji-Kabane were processed with complicated processes. ManonoObito-Uji who came from Mimana and lived in Oumino-Kuni(近江國) Sikano-Kohori(志賀郡) Manono-Mura(眞野村) changed Sutuji into Koubetu Uji through the process of Uji-Kabane to WanibenoOmi(和珥部臣,) and ManonoOmi(眞野臣). On the other hand, ManonoObito(眞野首) that moved from Manono area to Yamatono-Kuni(大和國) Sikinokamio-kohori(城上郡) Ohoichi(大市) inherited KurenoUtamai(伎樂舞) taking it as the family business and changed Uji name into OhoichinoObito(大市首) based on the name of the place they moved to. Unlike ManonoObito-Uji that emphasized the characteristics of clan claiming Mimana Sutuji within the scope of Han, there were ManonoMiyatuko-Uji(眞野造氏) changing Sutuji as descendent of Chogowang of Baekje and TaminoObito-Uji changing Sutuji as Baekje NurinoOmi(努利使主) of Baikje. Accordingly, it was found that Sutuji kaihen of KichitanoMuraji-Uji and Manono-Uji became different according to activities and residents of individual Ujis coming to Japan, Ujis that they had contacted based on the characteristics of Uji and Kabane.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김은숙, "'新撰姓氏錄'의 加耶系 氏族", 한국고대사논총, 2, pp.212~ (1991)
- 朴胤善, "渡日 百濟遺民의 활동", 석사, 한국사, pp.1995
- 이근우, "日本列島의 百濟 遺民에 대하여", 한국고대사연구, 23, pp.31~34 (2001)
- 김현구, "일본서기한국관계기사연구 Ⅱ", pp.334~335 (2003), 일지사
- 연민수, "古代日本의 伽倻觀의 형성과 변용", 일본서기연구, 20, pp.7~ (2004)
- 정효운, "고대 한 일국가와 타자인식", 신라문화, (28), pp.189~210 (2006), 신라문화연구소
- 나행주, "신라와 ‘임나의 조’ ―신라 측에서 본 종래설 비판―", 한일관계사연구, (29), pp.3~67 (2008), 한일관계사학회
- 박천수, "일본속의 고대 한국문화", pp.65~104 (2011), 진인진
- 박재용, "고대 일본 藤原氏와 백제계 渡倭人", 백제연구, 54(54), pp.171~194 (2011), 백제연구소
- 서보경, "『新撰姓氏錄』의 편찬과 목적", 한일관계사연구, (41), pp.31~79 (2012), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
- 末松保和, "任那興亡史", pp.31~33 (1945), 吉川弘文館
- 田中卓, "新撰姓氏錄の硏究", 田中卓著作集, 9, pp.35~38 (1996), 國書刊行會
- 関晃, "日本古代の政治と文化", 關晃著作集, 5, pp.18~ (1997), 吉川弘文館
- 橋本克彦, "大化前後の歸化人政策と其活動", 中央大學文學部紀要, 3, pp.33~34 (1955)
- 林屋辰三郞, "古代藝能とその繼承, In 中世藝能史の硏究-古代からの繼承と創造-", pp.174~175 (1960), 岩波書店
- 岸俊男, "日本古代政治史硏究", pp.22~ (1966), 塙書房
- 前川明久, "壬申の乱と湯沐邑", 日本歴史, 230, pp.16~28 (1967)
- 請田正幸, "六世紀前期の日朝關係-任那日本府を中心として-", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 11, pp.41~ (1974)
- 新村拓, "古代醫療官人制の基礎的考察-內藥司․典藥寮をめぐって-", 日本歷史, 351, pp.66~ (1977)
- 佐伯有清, "新撰姓氏録の研究", pp.40~41 (1981), 硏究篇吉川弘文館
- 佐伯有清, "新撰姓氏録の研究", pp.130~131 (1981), 考証篇1吉川弘文館
- 佐伯有清, "新撰姓氏録の研究", pp.32~ (1982), 考証篇2吉川弘文館
- 佐伯有清, "山上氏の出自と性格, In 日本古代氏族の硏究", pp.84~ (1985), 吉川弘文館
- 佐伯有清, "新撰姓氏録の研究", pp.79~ (1988), 考証篇5吉川弘文館
- 佐伯有清, "新撰姓氏錄の硏究", pp.59~84 (2001), 拾遺編吉川弘文館
- 大橋信彌, "近淡海國造について-近江古代豪族ノート3-", 滋賀考古學論叢, 2, pp.27~ (1981)
- 黛弘道, "官位十二階の實態と原流, In 律令國家成立史の硏究", pp.359~360 (1982), 吉川弘文館
- 鈴木靖民, "序論古代對外關係史の視覺, In 古代對外關係史の硏究", pp.44~45 (1985), 吉川弘文館
- 石上英一, "古代東アジア地域と日本, In 日本の社會史, In 列島內外の交通と國家", pp.89~ (1987), 岩波書店
- 石村貞吉, "有職故實", pp.73~ (1987), 上講談社
- 山尾幸久, "'日本書紀'任那關係記事の檢討, In 古代の日朝關係", pp.104~105 (1989), 塙書房
- 山尾幸久, "小野氏と小野妹子, In 遣隋使小野妹子", pp.14~17 (1994), 志賀町
- 李永植, "任那日本府の實體, In 加耶諸國と任那日本府", pp.208~210 (1993), 吉川弘文館
- 大町健, "東アジアの中の日本律令國家, In 律令國家の展開", pp.223~224 (2004), 日本史講座2東京大學出版會
- 中村友一, "'新撰姓氏錄'と｢未定雜姓｣氏族について", ヒストリア, 196, pp.4~ (2005)
- 古系圖硏究會加藤謙吉代表, "和珥部氏系圖について", 中央史學, 2, pp.163~169 (2006)
- 平野邦雄, "歸化人と古代王權, In 歸化人と古代國家", pp.128~129 (2007), 吉川弘文館
- 加藤謙吉, "渡來系氏族の出自改變-皇別․神別諸氏との同祖․同族化をめぐって, In 古代韓日交流와相互認識", pp.176~ (2011), 東北亞歷史財團韓日國際會議發表集
- 淸野敬三, "'新撰姓氏錄'にみる｢皇別｣の信憑性", 季刊邪馬臺國, 110, pp.120~ (2011)