백제의 對倭交涉에서 質의 역할
The Role of Hostages in Baekje's Negotiations with Wae(倭)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the form and role of hostages(質) sent by Baekje to Wae(倭) in the negotiation process between Baekje and Wae(倭). As a diplomatic envoy representing the king, the hostage played a role in eliciting political and military cooperation from the other country. Baekje began to send the crown prince Jeonji(腆支) to Wae(倭) as a hostage in 397, and continued to send hostages to Wae(倭) until the 7th century. The hostage was a royal family or a high-ranking official and stayed in Wae(倭) for a long time. Such hostage status and duration of stay would have increased the trust of Wae(倭) and increased efficiency in negotiating with Wae(倭). The dispatch of hostages was made under the basis of Baekje's foreign policy. In consideration of the external circumstances of the war with Goguryeo or Silla, Baekje dispatched hostages to induce cooperation with Wae(倭). Also, through the hostage activities, the friendly relationship between Baekje and Wae(倭) was maintained for a long time.
Abstract
This paper examines the form and role of hostages(質) sent by Baekje to Wae(倭) in the negotiation process between Baekje and Wae(倭). As a diplomatic envoy representing the king, the hostage played a role in eliciting political and military cooperation from the other country. Baekje began to send the crown prince Jeonji(腆支) to Wae(倭) as a hostage in 397, and continued to send hostages to Wae(倭) until the 7th century. The hostage was a royal family or a high-ranking official and stayed in Wae(倭) for a long time. Such hostage status and duration of stay would have increased the trust of Wae(倭) and increased efficiency in negotiating with Wae(倭). The dispatch of hostages was made under the basis of Baekje's foreign policy. In consideration of the external circumstances of the war with Goguryeo or Silla, Baekje dispatched hostages to induce cooperation with Wae(倭). Also, through the hostage activities, the friendly relationship between Baekje and Wae(倭) was maintained for a long time.
참고문헌 (23)
- 孔錫龜, "高句麗 領域擴張史 硏究" (1998), 書景文化社
- 金煐泰, "百濟佛敎思想硏究" (1985), 동국대학교출판부
- 김현구, "일본서기 한국관계기사 연구(Ⅲ)" (2004), 일지사
- 노중국, "백제정치사" (2018), 일조각
- 연민수, "고대일본의 대한인식과 교류" (2014), 역사공간
- 李丙燾, "韓國史(古代篇)" (1959), 乙酉文化史
- 장창은, "신라 상고기 정치변동과 고구려 관계" (2008), 신서원
- 金鉉球, "大和政權の對外關係硏究" (1985), 吉川弘文館
- 森田悌, "官職と位階" (2009), 新人物往來社
- 遠山美都男, "白村江" (1997), 講談社現代新書
- 坂元義種, "古代東アジアの日本と朝鮮" (1978), 吉川弘文館
- 김병곤, "백제의 태자 책봉제 수용 과정 고찰", 동아시아고대학, (24), pp.265~295 (2011), 동아시아고대학회
- 나행주, "왜 왕권과 백제신라의「質」- 왜국의「質」導入受容의 의미 -", 일본역사연구, (24), pp.29~88 (2006), 일본사학회
- 남정호, "『日本書紀』에 보이는 豊章과 翹崎 關聯 記事의 再檢討", 백제연구, (60), pp.119~153 (2014), 백제연구소
- 신유진, "『日本書紀』에 보이는 百濟의 ‘君’號에 대한 考察", 한일관계사연구, (44), pp.3~42 (2013), 한일관계사학회
- 梁起錫, "三國時代 人質의 性格에 對하여", 史學志, 15 (1981)
- 李基東, "中國史書에 보이는 百濟王 牟都에 대하여", 歷史學報, 62 (1974)
- 이재석, "5세기말의 백제와 倭國", 日本歷史硏究, 14 (2001)
- 장미애, "의자왕대 정치세력의 변화와 대외정책", 역사와 현실, (85), pp.225~258 (2012), 한국역사연구회
- 장미애, "『일본서기(日本書紀)』 응신기(應神紀) 성격과 5세기 전반 백제-왜 관계의 이해", 역사와 현실, (120), pp.77~112 (2021), 한국역사연구회
- 장병진, "백제 부여풍 후손의 행적에 관한 새 자료 - 조인본, 부여씨 부부의 묘지명 -", 역사와 현실, (123), pp.225~263 (2022), 한국역사연구회
- 전덕재, "4세기 국제관계의 재편과 신라의 대응", 역사와 현실, 36 (2000)
- 최슬기, "衛滿朝鮮과 匈奴의 ‘穢裘’ 交易", 선사와 고대, (52), pp.53~86 (2017), 한국고대학회[DOI]