Bare Direct Quotation and Speaker’s Stance in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Quotation has attracted attention from diverse disciplines for its inherent higher-order nature. The quotation typology is complex in Korean, presumably as in any language, and this paper addresses one unique type of quotation, i.e. ‘Bare Direct Quotation (BDQ)’, unique in that it formally appears as a direct quotation, yet is stripped off of many socio-pragmatic morpho-syntactic devices that should have appeared in actual utterances. Thus, BDQs are a type of pseudo-quotations. This research explores how stance-marking is associated with BDQs. The existence of BDQ brings forth diverse implications in the studies of grammar that merit a special attention. It sheds light on the questions of what constitutes the ‘essential’ elements in grammar; and what relationships there are among the functionally similar grammatical forms. More importantly, it shows how different stances of the speaker are represented, since BDQs are often employed in the narration of confrontation episodes or other emotive contexts, where such stance-marking is prominent. In so doing, this research presents a useful ground-work for future research on quotation-related linguistic structures, most prominently from grammaticalization perspectives.
Abstract
Quotation has attracted attention from diverse disciplines for its inherent higher-order nature. The quotation typology is complex in Korean, presumably as in any language, and this paper addresses one unique type of quotation, i.e. ‘Bare Direct Quotation (BDQ)’, unique in that it formally appears as a direct quotation, yet is stripped off of many socio-pragmatic morpho-syntactic devices that should have appeared in actual utterances. Thus, BDQs are a type of pseudo-quotations. This research explores how stance-marking is associated with BDQs. The existence of BDQ brings forth diverse implications in the studies of grammar that merit a special attention. It sheds light on the questions of what constitutes the ‘essential’ elements in grammar; and what relationships there are among the functionally similar grammatical forms. More importantly, it shows how different stances of the speaker are represented, since BDQs are often employed in the narration of confrontation episodes or other emotive contexts, where such stance-marking is prominent. In so doing, this research presents a useful ground-work for future research on quotation-related linguistic structures, most prominently from grammaticalization perspectives.
참고문헌 (13)
- "and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge", Cambridge University Press.
- "Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness or minding your P's and Q's. Proceedings of Ninth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society", pp.305~
- "Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London"
- "is it for if it's before me?: Subjectification and Grammaticalization of English for and before", 84, pp.209~231 (2007)
- "Through a Borrowed Mouth: Reported Speech and Subjectification in Korean" (2007), Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky
- "Subjectification of Reported Speech in Grammaticalization and Lexicalization" (2007), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
- "Interpersonal vs. Intrapersonal Orientation in Request Speech Act: A Cross-Cultural Exploration" (2007), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
- "Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language" (1995), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- "Elizabeth C. 1982. From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. Lehmann Perspectives in Historical Linguistics. 245"
- "Elizabeth C. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning in English An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 57", pp.65~
- "Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge" (2002), : Cambridge University Press
- "Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited. Traugott Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 volumes. Vol. 1"
- "Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication", pp.411~448, Oxford: Oxford +University Press.