A Didactic Study for Learners of French: Yes/No Questions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the present paper, we try to offer an improved didactic method to solve the problems (structure, words order) that foreign learners encounter while trying to formulate french questions. We constructed our explanation on a step by step approach, for two main reasons. First, our aim here is not only to present the results of our investigation, but to present a teaching method to be used as such. Second, the theoretical mathematical combination of the main distinctive elements of each formulation (absence of a grammatical interrogative element, the use of "est-ce que", inversions, etc. ) leads to quite a number or theoretical possibilities. From a didactic point of view, text explanations on this subject are insufficient because possibilities (and non-possibilities) are numerous. Some recapitulory tables are needed, but most set of explanations, in textbooks, grammars or articles, are constructed without. On another hand , trying to explain and summarize the different possibilities (and non-possibilities) in only one table, without a step by step approach based on several ones, would lead, in our point of view, to an explanation difficult to remember and a table difficult to read. The "french questions" subject being wide, we limit ourselves here to yes/no direct affirmative questions
Abstract
In the present paper, we try to offer an improved didactic method to solve the problems (structure, words order) that foreign learners encounter while trying to formulate french questions. We constructed our explanation on a step by step approach, for two main reasons. First, our aim here is not only to present the results of our investigation, but to present a teaching method to be used as such. Second, the theoretical mathematical combination of the main distinctive elements of each formulation (absence of a grammatical interrogative element, the use of "est-ce que", inversions, etc. ) leads to quite a number or theoretical possibilities. From a didactic point of view, text explanations on this subject are insufficient because possibilities (and non-possibilities) are numerous. Some recapitulory tables are needed, but most set of explanations, in textbooks, grammars or articles, are constructed without. On another hand , trying to explain and summarize the different possibilities (and non-possibilities) in only one table, without a step by step approach based on several ones, would lead, in our point of view, to an explanation difficult to remember and a table difficult to read. The "french questions" subject being wide, we limit ourselves here to yes/no direct affirmative questions
참고문헌 (7)
- Bayol, Bavencoffe, "La grammaire française" (1998), Nathan. Paris
- Boeckx,Cedrix, "Decomposing French Questions" (1999), 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium at the University of Pennsylvania
- Chevalier, Blanche-B., "Grammaire Larousse du Français Contemporain" (1964), Larousse. Paris
- Grévisse, "Le BonUsage" (1980), 11ème and et sv., Duculot. Paris -Gembloux
- Hanneman,Greg, "Hanneman, Greg. 2006. Word Order of French Questions, Grammar Formalisms (www.cs.cmu.edu", ~ (2006)
- Mauger, "Grammaire Pratique du Français d'Aujourd'hui" (1968), Hachette. Paris
- Rowlinson, William, "Oxford French Grammar" (1991), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York