본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Interpersonal vs. Intrapersonal Orientation in Request Speech Acts: A Cross-Cultural Exploration

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Having means of expressing politeness is widely regarded as a language universal. However, the actual strategies involved in expressing such a concept are by no means uniform. Politeness is a particularly important component in request speech acts because the accomplishment of the speaker's intended goal depends on the addressee's compliance. This study compares the devices recruited by the West and the East, mainly comparing English, Spanish, and German on the one hand, and Korean, Chinese and Japanese on the other. A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural investigation was performed with such politeness formulae in request speech acts as those largely equivalent to “Would you please...?” and “Could you please...?.” Those Occidental languages have recourse to power and volition, characterizable as the features of intrapersonal orientation, e.g. podría (S), könten (G), würden (G), etc. On the other hand, the Oriental languages tend to use the verbs of interaction and benefaction, e.g. cwuta ‘give (K)', kudasaru ‘give (J)', morau ‘receive (J)', and itadaku ‘receive (J),' qĭng ‘request (C)', and bāng ‘help (C),' thus manifesting a high level of interpersonal orientation. Furthermore, the Occidental languages tend to resort to personal feelings (e.g. please (E), favor (E/S), whereas the Oriental languages tend to resort to the quantity (e.g. yixià ‘once (C),' com ‘a little (K)' and chotto/sukoshi ‘a little (J).' The results of the contrastive analysis point to the fact that the two cultures utilize profoundly different persuasion strategies.

Abstract

Having means of expressing politeness is widely regarded as a language universal. However, the actual strategies involved in expressing such a concept are by no means uniform. Politeness is a particularly important component in request speech acts because the accomplishment of the speaker's intended goal depends on the addressee's compliance. This study compares the devices recruited by the West and the East, mainly comparing English, Spanish, and German on the one hand, and Korean, Chinese and Japanese on the other. A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural investigation was performed with such politeness formulae in request speech acts as those largely equivalent to “Would you please...?” and “Could you please...?.” Those Occidental languages have recourse to power and volition, characterizable as the features of intrapersonal orientation, e.g. podría (S), könten (G), würden (G), etc. On the other hand, the Oriental languages tend to use the verbs of interaction and benefaction, e.g. cwuta ‘give (K)', kudasaru ‘give (J)', morau ‘receive (J)', and itadaku ‘receive (J),' qĭng ‘request (C)', and bāng ‘help (C),' thus manifesting a high level of interpersonal orientation. Furthermore, the Occidental languages tend to resort to personal feelings (e.g. please (E), favor (E/S), whereas the Oriental languages tend to resort to the quantity (e.g. yixià ‘once (C),' com ‘a little (K)' and chotto/sukoshi ‘a little (J).' The results of the contrastive analysis point to the fact that the two cultures utilize profoundly different persuasion strategies.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Agar, Michael, "Language Shock" (1994), Morrow
  2. Brown, Penelope, "Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena In: Questions and Politeness", pp.56~289 (1978), Cambridge University Press
  3. Brown, Penelope, "Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  4. Bybee, Joan L, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
  5. Eom, Sujin, "A comparative analysis of grammaticalization in English and Korean modal auxiliaries", the Second Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics (2003), Korea University
  6. Hall, Edward T, "Beyond Culture" (1976), Anchor Books
  7. Hall, Edward T, "Understanding Cultural Differences" (1990), Intercultural Press
  8. Kasper, Gabriele, "Linguistic politeness: Current research issues", Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), pp.193~218 (1990)
  9. Lakoff, Robin, "Language and Woman’s Place", Language in Society, 2, pp.45~79 (1973)
  10. Lakoff, Robin, "Language and Woman’s Place" (1975), Harper & Row
  11. Leech, Geoffrey, "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
  12. Halliday, Michael A. K, "Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning" (1978), University Park Press
  13. Halliday, Michael A. K., "Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective" (1991), Oxford University Press
  14. Young, Robert, "English as a second language for Navajos In: A Pluralistic Nation", pp.162~172 (1978), Newbury House

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)