보조사 ‘서’의 의미 특성 (1)
On the Semantic Properties of Auxiliary Postposition ‘seo’ (1)
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to clarify the semantic properties of auxiliary postposition ‘seo’ in modern Korean. First, I discuss the distinction between ‘eseo’ and ‘e’. Many Korean linguists tried to explain the difference between ‘eseo’ and ‘e’, but they couldn't draw a distinction between them. In this paper, I insist that ‘seo’ means the existence of someone or something, because ‘seo’ in modern Korean derived from ‘syeo’ in middle Korean, and ‘syeo’ was made by the combination of ‘si-’(existence) and ‘-eo’(completion). Therefore I make a clear distinction between ‘eseo’ and ‘e’ by the existence and the nonexistence. And I can explain the difference between ‘euro’ and ‘euroseo’, ‘ege’ and ‘egeseo’ in the same way. Second, I discuss ‘seo’, which was united with numeral. Most Korean linguists regarded ‘seo’ in this case as a subjective case marker. But I insist that ‘seo’ is an auxiliary postposition that means ‘existence’, and ‘i’ is a subjective case marker in ‘dul-i-seo(둘이서)’. Last, I discuss ‘seo’ in ‘meol-i-seo(멀리서)’. Many Korean linguists regarded ‘meol-i-seo’ as the combination of the adverb ‘meol-i’ and the auxiliary postposition ‘seo’. But I assert that ‘meol-i-seo’ was made by the combination of ‘meol-i’(noun), ‘e’(adverbial case marker) and ‘seo’(auxiliary postposition).
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify the semantic properties of auxiliary postposition ‘seo’ in modern Korean. First, I discuss the distinction between ‘eseo’ and ‘e’. Many Korean linguists tried to explain the difference between ‘eseo’ and ‘e’, but they couldn't draw a distinction between them. In this paper, I insist that ‘seo’ means the existence of someone or something, because ‘seo’ in modern Korean derived from ‘syeo’ in middle Korean, and ‘syeo’ was made by the combination of ‘si-’(existence) and ‘-eo’(completion). Therefore I make a clear distinction between ‘eseo’ and ‘e’ by the existence and the nonexistence. And I can explain the difference between ‘euro’ and ‘euroseo’, ‘ege’ and ‘egeseo’ in the same way. Second, I discuss ‘seo’, which was united with numeral. Most Korean linguists regarded ‘seo’ in this case as a subjective case marker. But I insist that ‘seo’ is an auxiliary postposition that means ‘existence’, and ‘i’ is a subjective case marker in ‘dul-i-seo(둘이서)’. Last, I discuss ‘seo’ in ‘meol-i-seo(멀리서)’. Many Korean linguists regarded ‘meol-i-seo’ as the combination of the adverb ‘meol-i’ and the auxiliary postposition ‘seo’. But I assert that ‘meol-i-seo’ was made by the combination of ‘meol-i’(noun), ‘e’(adverbial case marker) and ‘seo’(auxiliary postposition).
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "국어 형태론 연구" (1968), 서울대학교 출판부
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 국립국어연구원, "표준 국어 대사전" (1999), 두산 동아
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법1" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김양진, "의사 주어 ‘에서’의 형태통사론적 연구 In: 국어의 격과 조사", pp.941~986 (1999), 도서출판 월인
- 김영희, "처소격조사 ‘에서’의 생성적 분석", 연세어문학, 5, pp.59~86 (1973), 연세대 국어국문학과
- 김영희, "한국어 셈숱화 구문의 통사론" (1984), 탑출판사
- 김창섭, "서평: 고영근 국어 형태론 연구 In:주시경학보 9", pp.158~168 (1992), 탑출판사
- 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론" (1987), 탑출판사
- 박양규, "국어의 처격에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1972
- 박지홍, "현대우리말본" (1981), 문성출판사
- 박호관, "국어 명사구 결합형 조사 ‘-서’의 의미 기능", 우리말글, 42, pp.65~88 (2008), 우리말글학회
- 서정목, "후치사 ‘-서’의 의미에 대하여-명사구 구성의 경우 -", 언어, 9(1), pp.155~186 (1984), 한국언어학회
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 송창선, "-었-'에 남아있는 '-어 있-'의 특성", 어문학, (73), pp.47~66 (2001), 한국어문학회
- 안명철, "처격 ‘에’의 의미", 관악어문연구, 7, pp.245~268 (1982), 서울대 국어국문학과
- 안명철, "보조조사 ‘-서’의 의미", 국어학, 14, pp.478~506 (1985), 국어학회
- 이광호, "처격어미 {에}, {에서}의 의미와 그 통합 양상", 어문학논총, 3, pp.87~105 (1984), 국민대 어문학연구소
- 이기동, "조사 ‘에’와 ‘에서’의 기본 의미", 한글, 173, pp.9~33 (1981), 한글학회
- 이남순, "양식의 ‘에’와 소재의 ‘에서’", 관악어문연구, 8, pp.321~355 (1983), 서울대 국어국문학과
- 이남순, "‘에’, ‘에서’와 ‘-어 있다’, ‘-고 있다’", 국어학, 16, pp.567~595 (1987), 국어학회
- 이숭녕, "15세기 국어의 쌍형어 ‘잇다, 시다’의 발달에 대하여", 국어학, 4, pp.1~23 (1976), 국어학회
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1992), 학연사
- 이현희, "현대국어의 화석과 그 역사적 해석", 國語學, (45), pp.275~288 (2005), 국어학회
- 임지룡, "학교문법과 문법교육" (2005), 박이정
- 임홍빈, "국어의 통사적인 공범주에 대하여", 어학연구, 21(3), pp.331~384 (1976), 서울대 어학연구소
- 황화상, "조사 ‘에서’의 문법 범주", 배달말, (39), pp.371~394 (2006), 배달말학회