『훈몽자회』와 『자전석요』의 한자 자석의 의미정보 수록 양상 비교 연구
A Comparison of the Aspects of Recording Semantic Information about Lemma Chinese Characters in Hunmongjahoe and Jajeonseogyo
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to explore the aspects of recording semantic information about lemma Chinese characters in Hunmongjahoe and Jajeonseogyo. Meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean and Chinese annotations show the semantic information about lemma Chinese characters in materials explaining meanings in Chinese characters. While Hunmongjahoe has meanings of Chinese characters in a upper category for a general meaning in meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean, and a different type for Chinese annotations explaining more specifically and intimately, Jajeonseogyo has the same type for both meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean and Chinese annotations. Based on this system, the aspects of recording semantic information in Hunmongjahoe and Jajeonseogyo are as follows. First, meaning categories of meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean are often different. In general, Jajeonseogyo shows more detailed subcategories of meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean than Hunmongjahoe does. Second, more than two lemma Chinese characters are explained as the same meaning of Chinese characters written in Korean in Hunmongjahoe but as the separate semantic information in Jajeonseogyo. Third, the number of meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean about Chinese characters also shows a difference. Hunmongjahoe shows one single meaning of Chinese characters, whereas Jajeonseogyo describes over two meanings. Fourth, the semantic information appears differently because each focuses on different meanings about the same lemma Chinese characters. This results show that Hunmongjahoe maintains its conservativeness, and reveals for the first time semantic information fit for characteristics of each category containing lemma Chinese characters. However, Jajeonseogyo distinctly reveals renewing of meanings of Chinese characters by describing elaborate meanings of Chinese characters compared with Hunmongjahoe.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the aspects of recording semantic information about lemma Chinese characters in Hunmongjahoe and Jajeonseogyo. Meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean and Chinese annotations show the semantic information about lemma Chinese characters in materials explaining meanings in Chinese characters. While Hunmongjahoe has meanings of Chinese characters in a upper category for a general meaning in meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean, and a different type for Chinese annotations explaining more specifically and intimately, Jajeonseogyo has the same type for both meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean and Chinese annotations. Based on this system, the aspects of recording semantic information in Hunmongjahoe and Jajeonseogyo are as follows. First, meaning categories of meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean are often different. In general, Jajeonseogyo shows more detailed subcategories of meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean than Hunmongjahoe does. Second, more than two lemma Chinese characters are explained as the same meaning of Chinese characters written in Korean in Hunmongjahoe but as the separate semantic information in Jajeonseogyo. Third, the number of meanings of Chinese characters written in Korean about Chinese characters also shows a difference. Hunmongjahoe shows one single meaning of Chinese characters, whereas Jajeonseogyo describes over two meanings. Fourth, the semantic information appears differently because each focuses on different meanings about the same lemma Chinese characters. This results show that Hunmongjahoe maintains its conservativeness, and reveals for the first time semantic information fit for characteristics of each category containing lemma Chinese characters. However, Jajeonseogyo distinctly reveals renewing of meanings of Chinese characters by describing elaborate meanings of Chinese characters compared with Hunmongjahoe.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김진규, "訓蒙字會 어휘 연구" (1993), 형설출판사
- 남기탁, "한자학습서에 나타난 한자훈 집 攷", 어문연구, 11(4), pp.575~590 (1983), 일조각
- 노은주, "법화경의 번역에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1990
- 박병철, "千字文 訓의 語彙 變遷 硏究", 국어교육, 55, pp.135~152 (1986), 한국어교육학회
- 박형익, "(한국의) 사전과 사전학" (2004), 월인
- 서수백, "한자 새김 자료의 새김 수용 양상 연구", 한국말글학, 21, pp.105~146 (2004), 한국말글학회
- 서수백, "字類註釋의 사전적 체재 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 서수백, "『字類註釋』수록 한문 주석의 사전적 특성 연구", 국어사연구(학회지 명칭 변경), (10), pp.175~198 (2010), 국어사학회
- 손희하, "새김어휘연구", 박사, pp.1991
- 신경철, "국어 자석 연구" (1993), 태학사
- 여찬영, "경서류언해의 번역학적 연구", 한국전통문화연구, 3, pp.115~216 (1987), 한국전통문화연구소
- 여찬영, "어류 명칭어 한자 훈의 연구", 어문학, 65, pp.87~110 (1998), 한국어문학회
- 여찬영, "지석영《자전석요》의 한자 자석 연구", 어문학, 79, pp.193~212 (2003), 한국어문학회
- 여찬영, "'자전석요'의 한자 자석 ‘고을일홈’ 연구*", 언어과학연구, 25, pp.195~214 (2003), 언어과학회
- 유현경, "한국어 사전 편찬학 개론" (2008), 역락
- 이광호, "語形 글, 글월, 글왈의 유의구조분석", 어문론총, (24), pp.91~104 (1990), 한국문학언어학회
- 이광호, "정몽유어․아학편․천자문의 분포적 특성", 언어과학연구, (48), pp.101~123 (2009), 언어과학회
- 이기문, "國語 語彙史 硏究" (1991), 동아출판사
- 이은규, "경민편 (언해) 이본의 번역 내용 비교", 언어과학연구, (43), pp.23~47 (2007), 언어과학회
- 이은규, "향약명 어휘의 변천 연구", 국어교육연구, (45), pp.475~520 (2009), 국어교육학회(since1969)
- 임지룡, "분류어휘집의 체제와 상관성", 국어학, 19, pp.395~425 (1989)
- 최범훈, "『字典釋要』에 나타난 難解字釋에 대하여", 국어국문학, 70, pp.47~75 (1976), 국어국문학회
