형법의 의미론적 특성
Semantic Characteristics of Penal Law
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are various types of laws in Korea. Unlike Anglo-American jurisprudence which focuses on unwritten laws, the Korean legal system values the written ones exclusively. All the legal provisions in the codes of law consist of language. Lawyers should foremost translate the words and the sentences of the legal codes into the specific meaning before they apply the legal provisions. They interpret the articles and the clauses in the codes of law in the legal ways. However, as mentioned, laws are expressed with language. It means the lawyers' viable translation of laws is the same as the translation of language. That being the case, we should be interested in going through legal terms with the linguistic point of view. Articles and clauses of laws are practically applied to many cases. In every case, there is a different application of the legal codes. It is hereby needed that the meaning of the words and the sentences in laws has to be translated semantically or pragmatically first before being translated legally. So this paper pays attention to Korean legal codes, particularly focusing on the penal law. As a result, it is claimed that the Korean penal law has ample semantic characteristics of modality, entailment, presupposition, implicature and deixis.
Abstract
There are various types of laws in Korea. Unlike Anglo-American jurisprudence which focuses on unwritten laws, the Korean legal system values the written ones exclusively. All the legal provisions in the codes of law consist of language. Lawyers should foremost translate the words and the sentences of the legal codes into the specific meaning before they apply the legal provisions. They interpret the articles and the clauses in the codes of law in the legal ways. However, as mentioned, laws are expressed with language. It means the lawyers' viable translation of laws is the same as the translation of language. That being the case, we should be interested in going through legal terms with the linguistic point of view. Articles and clauses of laws are practically applied to many cases. In every case, there is a different application of the legal codes. It is hereby needed that the meaning of the words and the sentences in laws has to be translated semantically or pragmatically first before being translated legally. So this paper pays attention to Korean legal codes, particularly focusing on the penal law. As a result, it is claimed that the Korean penal law has ample semantic characteristics of modality, entailment, presupposition, implicature and deixis.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김동규, "하버마스의 형식 화용론 연구: 입장변화를 중심으로", 사회와 철학, (17), pp.35~64 (2009), 한국사회와철학연구회
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2013), 삼영사
- 서보학, "형법총론" (2008), 박영사
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 김재원, "법과 언어-비트겐슈타인을 중심으로-", 법과사회, (30), pp.29~44 (2006), 법과사회이론학회
- 설헌영, "하버마스의 의사소통행위이론 연구", 범한철학, 20, pp.99~129 (1999), 범한철학회
- 김재윤, "새로운 형법총론" (2011), 율곡출판사
- 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2013), 박영사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2013), 法文社
- 오영근, "형법각론 제3판" (2014), 박영사
- 오원교, "소쉬르의 일반 언어학 강의 풀이", 한글, (161), pp.617~638 (1978), 한글학회
- 윤재왕, "권력분립과 언어 - 명확성원칙, 의미론 그리고 규범적 화용론 -", 강원법학, 44, pp.427~476 (2015), 비교법학연구소
- 이경재, "미국형법상 범죄조각사유 －정당화사유를 중심으로-", 법학연구, 23(1), pp.345~388 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이삼열, "하버마스의 삶과 철학의 도정", 현대철학강좌, 2(1), pp.89~113 (1999)
- 이상돈, "기초법학" (2010), 법문사
- 임웅, "형법총론" (2013), 법문사
- 장병기, "소쉬르의 일반 언어학 강의", 한글, (181), pp.119~142 (1983), 한글학회
- 정영일, "형법총론" (2010), 박영사
- Fann, K. T., "비트겐슈타인의 철학이란 무엇인가?" (1969), 서광사
- Kreidler, Charles W., "Introducing English Semantics" (1998), Routledge
- Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Saeed, John I., "Semantics" (2003), Blackwell Publishing Ltd