한국어 타동성 처소교체 구문에 대한 중국인 학습자의 논항 구조 인식 연구
L2 Perception on the Argument Structure of Korean Transitive Locative Verbs
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at exploring the grammaticality recognition of the L2 learners of Korean on the transitive locative structures. Argument alignment and locative alternation have been postulated as two linguistic contexts to design 12 locative verb sentences. 20 Korean native speakers(NKs) and 40 L1 Chinese learners of Korean(CKs) participated in the study. Research questions of the study are as below: RQ 1. Do CKs show different grammaticality judgments on locative structures compared to NKs do in terms of argument alignment and locative alternation? RQ 2. Is there L2 variation of language proficiency in the grammaticality judgments of the CK high group and that of CK low group? The results regarding RQ 1 showed that CKs exhibited significantly lower grammaticality judgment than NKs did regardless of the linguistic contexts. This implies that further attention on teaching of locative structures needs to be provided to the L2 learners. For RQ 2, CK low group showed significantly low grammaticality judgment on the sentences in unmarked contexts such as typical argument alignment structures and alternation structures. However, the grammaticality judgment of CK low and high groups were not consistant in non-alternation structures when they were compared to that in the other marked context, non-typical argument alignment structures. It implies that markedness hypothesis regarding typicalness of argument alignment in L2 acquisition is valid but not with locative alternation
Abstract
This study aims at exploring the grammaticality recognition of the L2 learners of Korean on the transitive locative structures. Argument alignment and locative alternation have been postulated as two linguistic contexts to design 12 locative verb sentences. 20 Korean native speakers(NKs) and 40 L1 Chinese learners of Korean(CKs) participated in the study. Research questions of the study are as below: RQ 1. Do CKs show different grammaticality judgments on locative structures compared to NKs do in terms of argument alignment and locative alternation? RQ 2. Is there L2 variation of language proficiency in the grammaticality judgments of the CK high group and that of CK low group? The results regarding RQ 1 showed that CKs exhibited significantly lower grammaticality judgment than NKs did regardless of the linguistic contexts. This implies that further attention on teaching of locative structures needs to be provided to the L2 learners. For RQ 2, CK low group showed significantly low grammaticality judgment on the sentences in unmarked contexts such as typical argument alignment structures and alternation structures. However, the grammaticality judgment of CK low and high groups were not consistant in non-alternation structures when they were compared to that in the other marked context, non-typical argument alignment structures. It implies that markedness hypothesis regarding typicalness of argument alignment in L2 acquisition is valid but not with locative alternation
참고문헌 (28)
- 고석주, "한국어 학습자 말뭉치와 오류 분석" (2004), 한국문화사
- 김영주, "영어권 고급학습자들의 조사 및 동사 어미 사용 - 오류 분석 -", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 31, pp.129~152 (2006), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 김윤신, "한국어 대상 이동 동사의 두 가지 의미 구조 : 교체형과 비교체형", 한국어 의미학, 17, pp.207~229 (2005), 한국어의미학회
- 김정숙, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 조사 사용 오류 분석과 교육 방법 －‘-이", 가’와 ‘-은, 한국어교육, pp.2002, 13(1)[DOI]
- 남승호, "의미구조의 표상과 실현" (2000), 소화출판사
- 남승호, "한국어 이동 동사의 의미구조와 논항교체", 어학연구, 39(1), pp.111~145 (2003)
- 박선희, "일본인 한국어 학습자의 처소교체 구문에 대한 문법성 인식 연구", 새국어교육, (99), pp.261~282 (2014), 한국국어교육학회
- 양정석, "국어동사의 의미 분석과 연결이론" (1995), 박이정
- 민진영, "한국어 고급 학습자의 조사 오류 분석", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2002
- 연재훈, "장소 보어 교체 구문의 자동사문과 타동사문", 언어, 23(1), pp.45~64 (1998)
- 이정민, "의미구조의 표상과 실현" (2000), 소화출판사
- 이정희, "한국어 학습자의 오류 연구" (2003), 박이정
- 이현진, "언어학 이론과 한국어 의미 통사 구조 습득 I" (1997), 민음사
- 임창국, "한국어 장소교체 구문에서의 대상논항의 통사적 특성과 통사구조", 어학연구, 42(1), pp.125~137 (2006), 언어교육원
- 조인정, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 주격과 목적격 조사 대치 오류에 대한 비교언어학적 분석", 한국어교육, 17(3), pp.281~299 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- 홍재성, "21세기 세종계획 전자사전 개발 2" (1999), 문화관광부
- 홍재성, "현대 한국어 동사구문의 연구" (1987), 탑출판사
- Bley-Vroman, R., "The Acquisition and Interpretation of English Locative Constructions by Native Speakers of Korean", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, pp.207~219 (2001)
- Choi, M. -H., "L2 Acquisition of English Locative Argument Structure by Native Speakers of Korean", 석사, pp.2001
- Eckman, F., "Markedness and the Constrastive Analysis Hypothesis", Language Learning, 27, pp.315~330 (1977)
- Inagaki, S, "Japanese and Chinese Learners’ Acquisition of the Narrow Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English", Language Learning, 47, pp.637~669 (1997)
- Joo, H. -R, "Second Language Learnability and the Acquisition of the Argument Sturcture of English Locative Verbs by Korean Speakers", Second Language Research, 19(4), pp.305~328 (2003)
- Juffs, A, "Syntax-semantics Correspondences in Second Language Acquisition", Second Language Research, 12, pp.177~221 (1996)
- Kim, M. -S., "A Cross-linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of Locative Verbs", 박사, pp.1999
- Pinker, S., "Learnability and Cognition" (1989), The MIT Press
- Plauche, M. C., "Markedness and the Evolution of Binary Spatial Deictics: French Voilà and Voici", Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.238~249 (1999), Berkeley Linguistics Society
- Slobin, D. I, "Grammatical Transformations and Sentence Comprehension in Childhood and Adulthood", Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 5, pp.219~227 (1966)
- Stowell, T, "Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon", pp.9~20 (1992), Academic Press