영어와 한국어 삼항 술어 구문 비교 분석
A Comparative Study of Three-place Predicate Constructions in English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of three-place predicate constructions in English and Korean. First I provide the classification of three-place predicates in English and Korean. In Korean, the scope of three-place predicates is confined to the constructions with the structure ‘X-ka Y-eyk(ey) Z-lul P-hata’. Second it is claimed that it could be a good analysis to posit double object constructions and dative constructions for English three-place predicates, while it is not desirable to posit the two constructions for Korean three-place predicates. Third, I discuss monosemy and polysemy theories on the meaning differences between double object constructions and dative constructions in English and Korean. Fourth, I compare the superiority effects of 'recipient' or 'patient' arguments in some syntactic processes.
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of three-place predicate constructions in English and Korean. First I provide the classification of three-place predicates in English and Korean. In Korean, the scope of three-place predicates is confined to the constructions with the structure ‘X-ka Y-eyk(ey) Z-lul P-hata’. Second it is claimed that it could be a good analysis to posit double object constructions and dative constructions for English three-place predicates, while it is not desirable to posit the two constructions for Korean three-place predicates. Third, I discuss monosemy and polysemy theories on the meaning differences between double object constructions and dative constructions in English and Korean. Fourth, I compare the superiority effects of 'recipient' or 'patient' arguments in some syntactic processes.
참고문헌 (21)
- 유현경, "‘주다’ 구문에 나타나는 조사 ‘에게’와 ‘에’", 한국어학, 20, pp.155~174 (2003)
- 조경순, "국어 세 자리 서술어의 의미구조 고찰", 한국어 의미학, 13, pp.117~142 (2003), 한국어의미학회
- 조경순, "국어 수여동사 연구 －소유의 변화를 중심으로－", 한국어 의미학, 27, pp.267~289 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 탁기현, "이중목적어 구문과 초점", 영어영문학, 18, pp.183~198 (1999)
- Aoun, J., "Scope and Constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.141~172 (1989)
- Dryer, M., "Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative", Language, 62, pp.808~845 (1986)
- Erteschik-Shir, N., "Discourse Constraint on Dative Movement in: Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax", pp.441~467 (1979), Academic Press
- Göbbel, E., "Focus in Double Object Constructions", Linguistics, 43, pp.237~274 (2005)
- Goldberg, A., "A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Gropen, J., "The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English", Language, 65, pp.203~257 (1989)
- Harley, H., "Possession and the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, pp.31~70 (2002)
- Jespersen, O., "Essentials of English Grammar" (1956), George Allen and Unwin Ltd
- Jung, Y., "Decomposing Ditransitive Verbs", Proceedings of SICGG (Summer 2003), pp.101~120 (2004)
- Kittilä, S., "Object-, Animacy- and Role-Based Strategies: A Typology of Object Marking", Studies in Language, 30, pp.1~32 (2006)
- Krifka, M., "Semantic and Pragmatic Conditions for the Dative Alternation", Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 4, pp.1~32 (2003)
- Larson, R., "On the Double Object Constrctions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Newman, J., "Three-place Predicates: A Cognitive-linguistic Perspective", Language Sciences, 27, pp.145~163 (2005)
- O'Grady, W., "The Interpretation of Korean Anaphora: The Role and Representation of Grammatical Relations", Language, 63, pp.251~277 (1987)
- Pinker, S., "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
- Polinsky, M., "A Non-syntactic Account of Some Asymmetries in the Double Object Construction in: Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap", pp.365~386 (1998), CSLI
- Van Valin, R., "The Role and Reference Grammar Analysis of Three-Place Predicates", Suvremena Lingvistika, 33, pp.31~63 (2007)