Constituting Face and Identities in Korean Institutional Discourse
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Many of the politeness studies do not address the idea that cultural values can control the perception of politeness and function as another ranking of the imposition (R) variable. Those studies neglect to see that cultural values influence the way linguistic politeness/ impoliteness is understood. Moreover, they do not take into account the fact that politeness is a culture-specific discursive concept. For this study a Confucian framework was integrated into Brown and Levinson’s politeness formula and then a questionnaire and a spoken discourse approach was used to capture the qualitative characteristics of interactional contexts. Findings herein highlight three important aspects of Korean honorific use in relation to linguistic politeness/ impoliteness. First, cultural values act as functional agents that provide a link between linguistic presentations and social practice. Second, Korean relational work requires Confucian cultural understanding and is a crucial element in the construction of individual identity.
Abstract
Many of the politeness studies do not address the idea that cultural values can control the perception of politeness and function as another ranking of the imposition (R) variable. Those studies neglect to see that cultural values influence the way linguistic politeness/ impoliteness is understood. Moreover, they do not take into account the fact that politeness is a culture-specific discursive concept. For this study a Confucian framework was integrated into Brown and Levinson’s politeness formula and then a questionnaire and a spoken discourse approach was used to capture the qualitative characteristics of interactional contexts. Findings herein highlight three important aspects of Korean honorific use in relation to linguistic politeness/ impoliteness. First, cultural values act as functional agents that provide a link between linguistic presentations and social practice. Second, Korean relational work requires Confucian cultural understanding and is a crucial element in the construction of individual identity.
참고문헌 (47)
- Arundale, R. B, "Face as Relational and Interactional: a Communication Framework for Research on Face, Face Work, and Politeness", Journal of Politeness Research, 2(2), pp.193~216 (2006)
- Blum-Kulka, S, "Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?", Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), pp.131~146 (1987)
- Blum-Kulka, S, "The Metapragmatic Discourse of American- Israeli Families at Dinner, In Interlanguage Pragmatics", pp.196~223 (1993), Oxford University Press
- Brown, P, "Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena, In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction", pp.56~311 (1978), Cambridge University Press
- Brown, P, "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Byon, A, "The Role of Linguistic Indirectness and Honorifics in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean Requests", Journal of Politeness Research, 2, pp.247~276 (2006)
- Cameron, D. E, "Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method" (1992), Routledge
- Eelen, G, "A Critique of Politeness Theories" (2001), St. Jerome Publishing
- Escandell-Vidal, V, "Towards a Cognitive Approach to Politeness", Language Sciences, 18, pp.629~650 (1996)
- Fukushima, S, "Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese" (2000), Peter Lang
- Harris, S, "Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse", Discourse and Society, 12(4), pp.451~472 (2001)
- Harris, S, "Politeness and Power: Making and Responding to ‘Requests’ in Institutional Settings", Text, 23(1), pp.27~52 (2003)
- Haugh, M, "The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative", Journal of Politeness Research, 3(1), pp.295~317 (2007)
- Heritage, J, "Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analysing Data, In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice", pp.222~246 (1997), Sage Publications
- Hong, J-O, "A Discourse Approach to Korean Politeness: Towards a Culture- specific Confucian Framework", 박사, pp.2009
- 홍진옥, "Beyond Politeness: A Spoken Discourse Approach to Korean Address Reference Terms", 영어어문교육, 15(2), pp.93~119 (2009), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 홍진옥, "A Discourse Approach to Korean Request Strategies: Korean Honorific Forms and Cultural Values", 언어과학연구, 56(56), pp.255~278 (2011), 언어과학회
- 홍진욱, "The Role of Confucian Scripts in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean Requests", 언어과학연구, 59(59), pp.369~394 (2011), 언어과학회
- 홍진욱, "Korean Requests as Reflected in Institutional Discourse Contexts", 언어과학연구, 61(61), pp.303~328 (2012), 언어과학회[DOI]
- Hutchby, I, "Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications" (1998), Polity Press Black Publishers Ltd
- Ide, S, "Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness", Multilingua, 8, pp.223~248 (1989)
- Kang, A, "Talk, Interaction, and Cultural Persistence: Constituting Korean American Discourse in a Meeting Context", 박사, pp.2000
- Leech, G, "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Locher, M, "Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication" (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Locher, M, "Politeness Theory and Relational Work", Journal of Politeness Research, 1, pp.9~33 (2005)
- Locher, M, "Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behavior, In Impoliteness in Language Studies in Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice", pp.77~99 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
- Matsumoto, Y, "Re-examination of the Universality of Face: Politeness in Japanese", Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), pp.403~426 (1988)
- Mills, S, "Gender and Politeness" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Milroy, L, "Observing and Analyzing Natural Language" (1987), Blackwell
- Pan, Y, "Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction" (2000), Ablex Publishing Corporation
- Reiter, M-R, "Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Request and Apology" (2000), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Schank, R. C, "Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human knowledge Structures" (1977), Hillsdale, NJ
- Schegloff, E. A, "On the Organization of Sequences as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in Talk-in Interaction, In Conversational Organization and its Development", pp.51~77 (1990), Ablex
- Schegloff, E. A, "In Another Context, In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon", pp.91~228 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Schegloff, E. A, "On Talk and Its Institutional Occasions, In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings", pp.101~134 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Schegloff, E. A, "Repair After Turn: the last Structurally Provided Defence of Intersubjectivity in Conversation", American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), pp.1295~1345 (1992)
- Schegloff, E. A, "Opening Up Closings", Semiotica, 8, pp.289~327 (1973)
- Spencer-Oatey, H, "Identity, Face and (Im) politeness", Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), pp.635~638 (2007)
- Spencer-Oatey, H, "Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face", Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), pp.639~656 (2007)
- Swann, J, "Gender and Language Use, In Introducing Sociolinguistics", pp.316~353 (2000), Edinburgh University Press
- ten Have, P, "Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide" (1999), Sage Publications
- Tracy, K, "The Many Faces of Face Work, In Handbook of Language and Social Psychology", pp.209~226 (1990), Wiley
- Terkourafi, M, "Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research", Journal of Politenes Research, 1(2), pp.237~262 (2005)
- Thornborrow, J, "Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse" (2002), Longman (Pearson Education)
- Watts, R. J, "Politeness" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Yum, J. O, "Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspective, In Korean Philosophy and Communication", pp.71~86 (1987), Academic Press
- Yum, J. O, "The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia", Communication Monographs, 55, pp.374~388 (1988)