On the Role of Discourse Context for Korean Colloquial Utterances
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines how Koreans process discourse when subject and object nominals and their post-nominal particles are or are not overtly expressed. It reports several tendencies regarding the presence and absence of subjects, objects, and their post-nominal particles, and it argues that their appearance and non-appearance in actual discourse are closely related to discourse context available to the interlocutors at the time of processing the given utterance. It also claims that both interlocutors strategically use the available discourse contexts to make the communication between them successful. Finally, this study suggests a new way of looking at the well-addressed phenomenon of the case marker ellipsis and zero anaphora in colloquial Korean. That is, subject and object nominals are overtly expressed only when they are necessary instead of saying that they are not expressed explicitly or they are omitted when unnecessary.
Abstract
This study examines how Koreans process discourse when subject and object nominals and their post-nominal particles are or are not overtly expressed. It reports several tendencies regarding the presence and absence of subjects, objects, and their post-nominal particles, and it argues that their appearance and non-appearance in actual discourse are closely related to discourse context available to the interlocutors at the time of processing the given utterance. It also claims that both interlocutors strategically use the available discourse contexts to make the communication between them successful. Finally, this study suggests a new way of looking at the well-addressed phenomenon of the case marker ellipsis and zero anaphora in colloquial Korean. That is, subject and object nominals are overtly expressed only when they are necessary instead of saying that they are not expressed explicitly or they are omitted when unnecessary.
참고문헌 (12)
- Asher, N., "Logics of Conversation" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Bak, J., "Optional Case Marking of the Possessor in Korean: A Study of Double Accusative Marking of Possessor", Possessee in Korean Based on Corpus Study and Optimality Computation, University of Manitoba, 2004
- Garrod, S. C., "Handbook of Psycholinguistics", pp.1994~ (1994), Academic Press
- Grosz, B. J., "Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse", Computational Linguistics, 12(3), pp.175~204 (1986)
- Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production, "Horton, W. S.", Discourse Processes, 1~35 (2005)
- Kehler, A, "Coherence and the Resolution of Ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(6), pp.533~575 (2000)
- 김태호, "Topic Continuity: Zero Anaphora and Case Marker Ellipsis", 현대문법연구, (56), pp.39~56 (2009), 현대문법학회
- Kim, Y. -J., "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case: The Interaction between Lexical and Syntactic Levels of Representation", Ph.D, pp.1990
- Mann, W. C, "Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization", Text, pp.243~281 (1988)
- Shimojo, M., "Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
- Sohn, H., "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Tao, L, "Topic Discontinuity and Zero Anaphora: Cognitive Strategies in Discourse Processing", Studies in Anaphora, pp.487~513 (1996)