본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The use and non-use of the subject and object markers ka and lul in conversational Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study investigates subject and object markings from an empirical perspective, and proposes two discourse-pragmatic factors for their analysis: processing load and informational prominence. The factors well capture the presence and absence of such markers. More specifically, ka, lul or both tend to overtly occur in a clause when the subject or the object of a clause or both would represent processing load, informational prominence or both, and they tend not to overtly occur in a clause when neither of the two factors is represented by the subject and the object (Kyung Hee University).

Abstract

This study investigates subject and object markings from an empirical perspective, and proposes two discourse-pragmatic factors for their analysis: processing load and informational prominence. The factors well capture the presence and absence of such markers. More specifically, ka, lul or both tend to overtly occur in a clause when the subject or the object of a clause or both would represent processing load, informational prominence or both, and they tend not to overtly occur in a clause when neither of the two factors is represented by the subject and the object (Kyung Hee University).

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Choi,Hye-Won, "Topic and Focus in Korean: The Information Partition by Phrase Structure and Morphology", Japanese, 1997, pp.6, 545~561
  2. Clancy, Patricia, "The use of 'wa' as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives. In: Perspectives on Topicalization: the Case of Japanese 'wa,' 3056" (1987), John Benjamins.
  3. Dixon,Robert M.W, "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  4. Du Bois,John, "The Discourse Basis of Ergativity", Language, 63, pp.805~855 (1987)
  5. Fry,John, "Ellipsis and wa-marking in Japanese Conversation" (2003), Routledge
  6. Hong,Ki-Sun, "Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean", 박사, pp.1991
  7. Jun,Jong-Sup, "Syntactic and Semantic Bases of Case Assignment: A Study of Verbal Nouns, Light Verbs and Dative", 박사, pp.2003
  8. Kang,Young-Sei, "Case Marking in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 1, pp.88~100 (1985)
  9. Kim,Kwang-Sup, "Where do the contrastive and focus readings come from?", pp.395~412 (1990), Hajime Hoji
  10. Kim,Young-Joo, "The Syntax of Semantics of Korean Case: The Interaction between Lexical and Syntactic Levels of Representation", 박사, pp.1990
  11. Ko,Eon-Suk, "A Discourse Analysis of the Realization of Object NP Forms in Korean", Ohak Yonku 'Language Research', 36(1), pp.43~62 (2000)
  12. Ko,Seok-Ju, "Hankwuke cosauy yenkwu: '-ka' wa 'lul'ul cwungsimulo 'A study of Korean Particles: focusing on '-ka' and '-lul.'", 박사, pp.2000
  13. Kuno,Susumu, "Funtional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.269~320 (1972)
  14. Kuno,Susumu, "Japanese: A Characteristic OV language", Syntactic Typology, chapter, 2, pp.57~138 (1978), University of Texas Press
  15. Lambrecht,Knud, "Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  16. Lee,Hanjung, "Effects of Focus and Markedness Hierarchies on Object Case Ellipsis in Korean", Discourse and Cognition, 13(2), pp.205~231 (2006)
  17. Lee, Hyo-Sang, "A Discourse Account of the Korean Accusative Marker", Studies in Language, 13(1), pp.105~128 (1989)
  18. Lee,Sungbom, "Taykyek cosa saynglyakuy hwayongcek pwunsek. 'A Pragmatic Analysis of Accusative Case-Marker Deletion.'", Discourse and Cognition, 13(3), pp.69~89 (2006)
  19. Min,Hyun-Sik, "A Study of the Case in Modern Korean", 석사, pp.1982
  20. Mok,Jung-Soo, "Re-examaination of Korean case markers and special particles: a typological approach", Linguistics, 23, pp.47~78 (1998)
  21. Ono, Tsuyoshi, "The pragmatic nature of the so-called subject marker 'ga' in Japanese: evidence from conversation", Discourse Studies, 2(1), pp.55~84 (2000)
  22. Shimojo,Mitsuaki, "Argument encoding types in Japanese conversation" (2005), Palgrave
  23. Simon,Mutsuko E, "An Analysis of the Postposing Construction in Japanese", 박사, pp.1989
  24. Sohn,Homin, "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  25. Thompson, Sandra A, "Transitive, clause structure, and argument structure: evidence from conversation. In: Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure", pp.27~60 (2001), John Benjamins.
  26. Tsutsui,Michio, "Particle Ellipsis in Japanese", 박사, pp.1984

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)