본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On Referentiality of Metonymy: Meaning and Form

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The present study aims to elucidate the two discrepancies in metonymy in English: one is about the agreement between a metonymic NP subject and a verb in number and person and the other is about the anaphora between a metonymic NP and a pronoun. As for agreement, in the cases of the NP composed of a determiner and a noun, the verb agrees with the entity which is metonymically referred to by the NP, but in the cases of the NP composed of a personal pronoun or a personal proper noun, the verb agrees with the NP itself, not the referential entity. As for anaphora, in the cases of the NP composed of a determiner and a noun, a pronoun is anaphoric with the referential entity denoted by the NP, but in the cases of the NP composed of a personal proper noun, a pronoun is anaphoric with the NP, not with the referential entity denoted by the NP. The reasons of each discrepancy are also discussed.

Abstract

The present study aims to elucidate the two discrepancies in metonymy in English: one is about the agreement between a metonymic NP subject and a verb in number and person and the other is about the anaphora between a metonymic NP and a pronoun. As for agreement, in the cases of the NP composed of a determiner and a noun, the verb agrees with the entity which is metonymically referred to by the NP, but in the cases of the NP composed of a personal pronoun or a personal proper noun, the verb agrees with the NP itself, not the referential entity. As for anaphora, in the cases of the NP composed of a determiner and a noun, a pronoun is anaphoric with the referential entity denoted by the NP, but in the cases of the NP composed of a personal proper noun, a pronoun is anaphoric with the NP, not with the referential entity denoted by the NP. The reasons of each discrepancy are also discussed.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Croft, William, "Cognitive Linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  2. Fauconnier, Gilles., "Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language" (1985), MIT Press
  3. Kleiber, Georges, "Polysémie, transferts de sens et métonymie intégréé", Folia Linguistica, 29, pp.105~132 (1995)
  4. Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
  5. Langacker, Ronald. W., "Active Zones", Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.172~188 (1984)
  6. Langacker, Ronald. W., "Grammar and Conceptualization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  7. Nunberg, Geoffrey., "The Pragmatics of Reference" (1978), Indiana University Linguistics Club
  8. Nunberg, Geoffrey, "Transfers of Meaning", Journal of Semantics, 17, pp.109~132 (1995)
  9. Panther, Klau-Uwe, "Introduction" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  10. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, "Chapter 10, Metonymy" (2007), Oxford University Press
  11. Stirling, Lesley, "Metonymy and Anaphora", In Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 10, pp.69~88 (1996)
  12. Ungerer, Friedrich, "An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics" (2006), Pearson Education Limited

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)