본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

On ‘Formal’ Metonymy: Relevance and Inference

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Metonymy, a phenomenon where expression A is used to stand for related expression B, has been analyzed in conceptual terms. Nunberg’s meaning transfer and cognitive linguistics’associations between two concepts are all about concepts. A relevance-theoretic approach suggests that a metonymic word is a case of an ad hoc concept construction just like hyperbole and metaphor. In this research, I present Korean examples which are intended to stand for other expressions which they resemble in form, such as aphmyen molswu for anmyen molswu‘pretending not to know,’ where aphmyen ‘front side’ is used to stand for anmyen ‘face, acquaintance.’ I call this phenomenon ‘formal’ metonymy, where expression A is used to stand for expression B which resembles A in form. Within a relevance theory framework, I analyze this kind of formal metonymy as a loose metarepresentation of the speaker’s intended expression. The speaker may be unable/unwilling to metarepresent what she intends to say precisely. By considerations of optimal relevance, the addressee infers the intended expression and meaning from the used expression and contextual implications. I conclude that a relevance-theoretic inferential account can provide a unitary account for both conceptual metonymy and formal metonymy.

Abstract

Metonymy, a phenomenon where expression A is used to stand for related expression B, has been analyzed in conceptual terms. Nunberg’s meaning transfer and cognitive linguistics’associations between two concepts are all about concepts. A relevance-theoretic approach suggests that a metonymic word is a case of an ad hoc concept construction just like hyperbole and metaphor. In this research, I present Korean examples which are intended to stand for other expressions which they resemble in form, such as aphmyen molswu for anmyen molswu‘pretending not to know,’ where aphmyen ‘front side’ is used to stand for anmyen ‘face, acquaintance.’ I call this phenomenon ‘formal’ metonymy, where expression A is used to stand for expression B which resembles A in form. Within a relevance theory framework, I analyze this kind of formal metonymy as a loose metarepresentation of the speaker’s intended expression. The speaker may be unable/unwilling to metarepresent what she intends to say precisely. By considerations of optimal relevance, the addressee infers the intended expression and meaning from the used expression and contextual implications. I conclude that a relevance-theoretic inferential account can provide a unitary account for both conceptual metonymy and formal metonymy.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Barcelona, Antonio, "Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction", pp.313~352 (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
  2. Barcelona, Antonio, "Review of Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain by Bogusław Bierwiaczonek", Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), pp.712~718 (2014)
  3. Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław., "Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain" (2013), Equinox
  4. Blakemore, Diane., "Understanding Utterances" (1992), Blackwell
  5. Blakemore, Diane, "Echo Questions: A Pragmatic Account", Lingua, 94(4), pp.197~211 (1994)
  6. Carston, Robyn, "Metalinguistic Negation and Echoic Use", Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), pp.309~330 (1996)
  7. Carston, Robyn., "Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication" (2002), Blackwell
  8. Carston, Robyn, "Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach", Language and Cognition, 3(2), pp.283~312 (2011)
  9. Carston, Robyn, "A Truth-Functional Account of Metalinguistic Negation, with Evidence from Korean", Language Sciences, 18, pp.485~504 (1996)
  10. Clark, Herbert H., "Studies in the Perception of Language", pp.295~322 (1978), Wiley
  11. Dirven, René, "Metonymy and Metaphor: Different Mental Strategies of Conceptualisation", pp.75~112 (2003)
  12. Dirven, René, "Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Falkum, Ingrid L., "The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polysemy: A Relevance-Theoretic Account", Ph.D., pp.2011
  14. Goossens, Louis, "The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action", pp.349~377 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  15. Jodlowiec, Maria, "Metonymy Revisited: Towards a New Relevance-Theoretic Account", Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(2), pp.161~187 (2015)
  16. Lakoff, George., "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  17. Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
  18. Littlemore, Jeanette., "Cognitive Linguistics", pp.407~422 (2017), Cambridge University Press
  19. Noh, Eun-Ju., "Current Issues in Relevance Theory", pp.271~304 (1998), John Benjamins
  20. Noh, Eun-Ju, "Echo Questions: Metarepresentation and Pragmatic Enrichment", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(6), pp.603~628 (1998)
  21. Noh, Eun-Ju., "Metarepresentation: A Relevance-Theory Account" (2000), John Benjamins
  22. Nunberg, Geoffrey, "The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy", Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(2), pp.143~184 (1979)
  23. Nunberg, Geoffrey, "Transfers of Meaning", Journal of Semantics, 12, pp.109~132 (1995)
  24. Nunberg, Geoffrey., "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.344~364 (2004), Blackwell
  25. Papafragou, Anna, "On Metonymy", Lingua, 99, pp.169~195 (1996)
  26. Radden, Günter, "The Cognitive Linguistics Reader", pp.335~359 (2007), Equinox
  27. Rebollar, Bárbara Eizaga, "A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective on Metonymy", 32nd International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (AESLA): Language Industries and Social Change Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, pp.191~198 (2015)
  28. Song, Nam Sun, "Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications", pp.87~104 (1998), John Benjamins
  29. Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
  30. Wilson, Deirdre, "Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective", pp.411~ (2000), Oxford University Press
  31. Wilson, Deirdre, "On Verbal Irony", Lingua, 87, pp.53~76 (1992)
  32. Wilson, Deirdre, "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.607~632 (2004), Blackwell
  33. Wilson, Deirdre, "Pragmatics", pp.230~259 (2007), Palgrave

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)