본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘만큼’의 의미-기능적 특성에 대한 일고

A Study on the Semantico-Functional Characteristics of Mankeum.

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This article aims to study several usages of mankeum in the aspect of semantico-functional change. The argued results are summarized as follows: [1] The bound noun mankeum meaning basically ‘degree of equivalence’ appears as a noun phrase, composed of {determiner/ modifier form +mankeum+case marker}. [2] The constructions of {modifier form+mankeum} are divided into three types. Mankeum meaning ‘a degree’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄹ,’ assuming the feature [-certainty], whereas mankeum meaning ‘a cause’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄴ’ assuming the feature [+certainty]. The construction {-ㄹ+mankeum} is not an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence, but an embedded adverbial sentence functioning as an adverbial phrase within the main sentence, whereas the construction {-ㄴ+mankeum} functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. Lastly, the construction {-는+mankeum} meaning ‘a degree of proportion’ also functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. [3] Mankeum is widely used as three types of postpositional particle such as a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle. First, mankeum as a special particle appears with the construction {N+mankeum+case marker}. In this case {N+mankeum} can be paraphrased into the construction {Ni(/eul) -neun+mankeum} where N appears as a subject NP or as an object NP of the same predicate as the main sentence. This shows that mankeum is changed from a bound noun into a special particle. Second, mankeum appears as a comparative marker with the construction {N+mankeum}. Third, mankeum appears as a compound particle like Nmankeum-eun, Nmankeum-iya, Nmankeum-do, Nmankeum-irado, Nmankeum-ina, or Nmankeum-man when it is fused with a particle like eun, (i)ya, do, (i)rado, (i)na, or man. These compound particles signify a new meaning respectively. To sum up, the word mankeum is not just divided into two usages such as a bound noun and a postpositional particle. From the point of view of semantico-functional change, it has several usages like an adverbial clausal ending, a conjunctional ending, a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle, which emerges from the fusion with an adnominal ending or with a particle.

Abstract

This article aims to study several usages of mankeum in the aspect of semantico-functional change. The argued results are summarized as follows: [1] The bound noun mankeum meaning basically ‘degree of equivalence’ appears as a noun phrase, composed of {determiner/ modifier form +mankeum+case marker}. [2] The constructions of {modifier form+mankeum} are divided into three types. Mankeum meaning ‘a degree’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄹ,’ assuming the feature [-certainty], whereas mankeum meaning ‘a cause’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄴ’ assuming the feature [+certainty]. The construction {-ㄹ+mankeum} is not an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence, but an embedded adverbial sentence functioning as an adverbial phrase within the main sentence, whereas the construction {-ㄴ+mankeum} functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. Lastly, the construction {-는+mankeum} meaning ‘a degree of proportion’ also functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. [3] Mankeum is widely used as three types of postpositional particle such as a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle. First, mankeum as a special particle appears with the construction {N+mankeum+case marker}. In this case {N+mankeum} can be paraphrased into the construction {Ni(/eul) -neun+mankeum} where N appears as a subject NP or as an object NP of the same predicate as the main sentence. This shows that mankeum is changed from a bound noun into a special particle. Second, mankeum appears as a comparative marker with the construction {N+mankeum}. Third, mankeum appears as a compound particle like Nmankeum-eun, Nmankeum-iya, Nmankeum-do, Nmankeum-irado, Nmankeum-ina, or Nmankeum-man when it is fused with a particle like eun, (i)ya, do, (i)rado, (i)na, or man. These compound particles signify a new meaning respectively. To sum up, the word mankeum is not just divided into two usages such as a bound noun and a postpositional particle. From the point of view of semantico-functional change, it has several usages like an adverbial clausal ending, a conjunctional ending, a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle, which emerges from the fusion with an adnominal ending or with a particle.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
  2. 김석득, "우리말형태론" (1992), 탑출판사
  3. 김정아, "중세국어의 비교 구문 연구" (1998), 태학사
  4. 김지은, "‘만큼’의 문법적 갈래와 용법-‘관형사형 어미+만큼’의 용법을 중심으로-", 한국학논집, 50(50), pp.303~326 (2013), 한국학연구원
  5. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2014), 박이정
  6. 성광수, "국어조사에 대한 연구" (1979), 형설출판사
  7. 심재기, "관형화의 의미 기능", 어학연구, 15(2) (1979)
  8. 안주호, "한국어 명사의 문법화 현상 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
  9. 왕문용, "근대국어의 의존 명사 연구" (1988), 도서출판 한샘
  10. 유현경, "국어 접속문의 통사적 특질에 대하여", 한글, 191, pp.77~104 (1986)
  11. 이남순, "특수조사의 통사기능", 진단학보, 82 (1996), 진단학회
  12. 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" (2000), 학연사
  13. 이태영, "국어 동사의 문법화 연구" (1988), 한신문화사
  14. 이희승, "국어대사전" (1998), 민중서림
  15. 임동훈, "한국어 조사의 하위 부류와 결합 유형", 國語學, 11(43), pp.119~154 (2004), 국어학회
  16. 임홍빈, "국어문법론. I" (1997), 한국방송대학교출판부
  17. 최형용, "형식명사·보조사·접미사의 상관관계", 국어 연구, 148, pp.1~117 (1997)
  18. 한글학회, "우리말큰사전" (1991), 어문각
  19. 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
  20. 홍사만, "연역적 논증과 귀납적 추론", 어문론총, (46), pp.131~172 (2007), 한국문학언어학회
  21. 홍양추, "국어 부사절 내포문 연구", 한글, 4(203), pp.49~92 (1989)
  22. M. L. Samuels, "Linguistic Evolution" (1972), Cambridge Univ. Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)