‘만큼’의 의미-기능적 특성에 대한 일고
A Study on the Semantico-Functional Characteristics of Mankeum.
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to study several usages of mankeum in the aspect of semantico-functional change. The argued results are summarized as follows: [1] The bound noun mankeum meaning basically ‘degree of equivalence’ appears as a noun phrase, composed of {determiner/ modifier form +mankeum+case marker}. [2] The constructions of {modifier form+mankeum} are divided into three types. Mankeum meaning ‘a degree’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄹ,’ assuming the feature [-certainty], whereas mankeum meaning ‘a cause’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄴ’ assuming the feature [+certainty]. The construction {-ㄹ+mankeum} is not an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence, but an embedded adverbial sentence functioning as an adverbial phrase within the main sentence, whereas the construction {-ㄴ+mankeum} functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. Lastly, the construction {-는+mankeum} meaning ‘a degree of proportion’ also functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. [3] Mankeum is widely used as three types of postpositional particle such as a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle. First, mankeum as a special particle appears with the construction {N+mankeum+case marker}. In this case {N+mankeum} can be paraphrased into the construction {Ni(/eul) -neun+mankeum} where N appears as a subject NP or as an object NP of the same predicate as the main sentence. This shows that mankeum is changed from a bound noun into a special particle. Second, mankeum appears as a comparative marker with the construction {N+mankeum}. Third, mankeum appears as a compound particle like Nmankeum-eun, Nmankeum-iya, Nmankeum-do, Nmankeum-irado, Nmankeum-ina, or Nmankeum-man when it is fused with a particle like eun, (i)ya, do, (i)rado, (i)na, or man. These compound particles signify a new meaning respectively. To sum up, the word mankeum is not just divided into two usages such as a bound noun and a postpositional particle. From the point of view of semantico-functional change, it has several usages like an adverbial clausal ending, a conjunctional ending, a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle, which emerges from the fusion with an adnominal ending or with a particle.
Abstract
This article aims to study several usages of mankeum in the aspect of semantico-functional change. The argued results are summarized as follows: [1] The bound noun mankeum meaning basically ‘degree of equivalence’ appears as a noun phrase, composed of {determiner/ modifier form +mankeum+case marker}. [2] The constructions of {modifier form+mankeum} are divided into three types. Mankeum meaning ‘a degree’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄹ,’ assuming the feature [-certainty], whereas mankeum meaning ‘a cause’ responds to the adnominal ending form ‘-ㄴ’ assuming the feature [+certainty]. The construction {-ㄹ+mankeum} is not an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence, but an embedded adverbial sentence functioning as an adverbial phrase within the main sentence, whereas the construction {-ㄴ+mankeum} functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. Lastly, the construction {-는+mankeum} meaning ‘a degree of proportion’ also functions as an antecedent clause of the subordinate conjoined sentence. [3] Mankeum is widely used as three types of postpositional particle such as a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle. First, mankeum as a special particle appears with the construction {N+mankeum+case marker}. In this case {N+mankeum} can be paraphrased into the construction {Ni(/eul) -neun+mankeum} where N appears as a subject NP or as an object NP of the same predicate as the main sentence. This shows that mankeum is changed from a bound noun into a special particle. Second, mankeum appears as a comparative marker with the construction {N+mankeum}. Third, mankeum appears as a compound particle like Nmankeum-eun, Nmankeum-iya, Nmankeum-do, Nmankeum-irado, Nmankeum-ina, or Nmankeum-man when it is fused with a particle like eun, (i)ya, do, (i)rado, (i)na, or man. These compound particles signify a new meaning respectively. To sum up, the word mankeum is not just divided into two usages such as a bound noun and a postpositional particle. From the point of view of semantico-functional change, it has several usages like an adverbial clausal ending, a conjunctional ending, a special particle, a comparative marker or a compound particle, which emerges from the fusion with an adnominal ending or with a particle.
참고문헌 (22)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 김석득, "우리말형태론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 김정아, "중세국어의 비교 구문 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 김지은, "‘만큼’의 문법적 갈래와 용법-‘관형사형 어미+만큼’의 용법을 중심으로-", 한국학논집, 50(50), pp.303~326 (2013), 한국학연구원
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2014), 박이정
- 성광수, "국어조사에 대한 연구" (1979), 형설출판사
- 심재기, "관형화의 의미 기능", 어학연구, 15(2) (1979)
- 안주호, "한국어 명사의 문법화 현상 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 왕문용, "근대국어의 의존 명사 연구" (1988), 도서출판 한샘
- 유현경, "국어 접속문의 통사적 특질에 대하여", 한글, 191, pp.77~104 (1986)
- 이남순, "특수조사의 통사기능", 진단학보, 82 (1996), 진단학회
- 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" (2000), 학연사
- 이태영, "국어 동사의 문법화 연구" (1988), 한신문화사
- 이희승, "국어대사전" (1998), 민중서림
- 임동훈, "한국어 조사의 하위 부류와 결합 유형", 國語學, 11(43), pp.119~154 (2004), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "국어문법론. I" (1997), 한국방송대학교출판부
- 최형용, "형식명사·보조사·접미사의 상관관계", 국어 연구, 148, pp.1~117 (1997)
- 한글학회, "우리말큰사전" (1991), 어문각
- 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
- 홍사만, "연역적 논증과 귀납적 추론", 어문론총, (46), pp.131~172 (2007), 한국문학언어학회
- 홍양추, "국어 부사절 내포문 연구", 한글, 4(203), pp.49~92 (1989)
- M. L. Samuels, "Linguistic Evolution" (1972), Cambridge Univ. Press
