일본어「ほど」와 한국어「만큼」의 대조 연구
A Contrastive Study Between Japanese「hodo」and Korean「mankeum」
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper has closely examined what syntactic functions and meanings ‘hodo’ in Japanese and‘mankeum’ in Korean possess in sentences. Besides, their syntactic and semantic similarities anddifferences have been studied based on whether the two morphemes have their identical syntacticfunctions and semantic scopes. This study has shown that both morphemes do not own a singlefunction, but various syntactic functions. It has been shown that they have the function of ‘hukujoji’ astheir common functions, only ‘hodo’ in Japanese possesses the functions of ‘noun’ and ‘suffix’, and only‘mankeum’ in Korean owns the function of delimitative particles. This examination has presented that thebasic meaning containing all the various syntactic functions of ‘hodo’ in Japanese and ‘mankeum’ inKorean is ‘identical degree’, and could be differentiated into various contextual meanings in variouscontexts. This study has found that their common meanings are ‘identical degree, degree of intense, themost degree, the least degree, proportion’, the meanings of only ‘hodo’ are ‘time and degree, approximatenumbers and quantities’, and those of only ‘mankeum’ are ‘limit, degree corresponding to the quantity,degree corresponding to the preceding description, reason, emphasis’.
Abstract
This paper has closely examined what syntactic functions and meanings ‘hodo’ in Japanese and‘mankeum’ in Korean possess in sentences. Besides, their syntactic and semantic similarities anddifferences have been studied based on whether the two morphemes have their identical syntacticfunctions and semantic scopes. This study has shown that both morphemes do not own a singlefunction, but various syntactic functions. It has been shown that they have the function of ‘hukujoji’ astheir common functions, only ‘hodo’ in Japanese possesses the functions of ‘noun’ and ‘suffix’, and only‘mankeum’ in Korean owns the function of delimitative particles. This examination has presented that thebasic meaning containing all the various syntactic functions of ‘hodo’ in Japanese and ‘mankeum’ inKorean is ‘identical degree’, and could be differentiated into various contextual meanings in variouscontexts. This study has found that their common meanings are ‘identical degree, degree of intense, themost degree, the least degree, proportion’, the meanings of only ‘hodo’ are ‘time and degree, approximatenumbers and quantities’, and those of only ‘mankeum’ are ‘limit, degree corresponding to the quantity,degree corresponding to the preceding description, reason, emphasis’.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김승곤, "21세기 국어 토씨 연구", pp.268~ (2009), 경진문화
- 김정아, "중세국어의 비교구문연구", pp.182~183 (1998), 태학사
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론", pp.101~ (1993), 탑출판사
- 이인영, "日本語의 構文과 意味1" (1988), 法文社
- 한글학회, "우리말 사전", pp.722~723 (2008), 어문각
- 한규안, "接続助辞の辯別に関する一考察", 日語日文学, 12, pp.115~134 (1999), 大韓日語日文学会
- 韓奎安, "接？助？の辯別に？する？考察(Ⅱ)", 일어일문학연구, 43(1), pp.1~24 (2002), 한국일어일문학회
- 한규안, "接續助辭の辯別に關する－考察(Ⅲ)", 일어일문학연구, 49(2), pp.257~275 (2004), 한국일어일문학회
- 韓奎安, "接続助辞の辯別に関するー考察(Ⅳ)", 일어일문학, (27), pp.183~196 (2005), 대한일어일문학회
- 한규안, "「だけ」「ばかり」와 「만」「뿐」의 対照 研究", 일어일문학, (41), pp.127~154 (2009), 대한일어일문학회
- 한상룡, "한국어 ‘만큼’과 일본어 ‘ホド’의 대조연구", 일본문화학보, 7, pp.141~156 (1999)
- 최현배, "우리말본", pp.627~629 (1982), 정음사
- 奥津敬一郎, "いわゆる日本語助詞の研究", pp.24~49 (1986), 凡人社
- 北原保雄, "日本語助動詞の研究", pp.175~186 (1981), 大修館書店
- グループ·ジャマシイ, "日本語文型辞典", pp.529~ (1998), くろしお出版
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ" (1982), くろしお出版
- 時枝誠記, "日本文法口語篇", pp.188~190 (1950), 岩波書店
- 沼田善子, "いわゆる日本語助詞の研究", pp.110~192 (1986), 凡人社
- 橋本進吉, "助詞·助動詞の研究", pp.67~68 (1969), 岩波書店
- 松下大三郎, "增補校訂標準日本口語法", pp.369~370 (1977), 勉誠社
- 松村明, "日本文法大辞典", pp.772~ (1971), 明治書院
- 山田孝雄, "日本口語法講義", pp.159~166 (1922), 宝文舘