기후변화 국제 규범과 미국의 국내 선호 형성 과정
International Norms of Climate Change and the Preference Formation in the United States
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to explain the national preference for climate change norms in the United States focusing on the framing of climate change as a political issue and the translation into the domestic political process. Even though climate change emerged as a major international political issue in the late 1980s and is acknowledged as an environmental threat, there was still variation not only in the international arena but also in the domestic political responses. While several states accepted climate change norms and these norms are domestically salient, the United States rejected internationally formed normative commitment. This article suggests that national preference for international norms of climate change in the United States is formed in the contest process between advocates and opponents of climate change norms and seeks to explain it on the basis of norm-centered constructivism. While advocates' claims have not been salient in the United States, cost and equity arguments of opponent are accepted at large. After a long debate, there were some signs of convergence between advocates' and opponents' framing of climate change in terms of the importance of technology development and voluntary, market-based action in reducing CO2. It is plausible to suggest that the climate change norms fail to be salient in the United States and this seems to point to the importance of early framing of normative issue and debate.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explain the national preference for climate change norms in the United States focusing on the framing of climate change as a political issue and the translation into the domestic political process. Even though climate change emerged as a major international political issue in the late 1980s and is acknowledged as an environmental threat, there was still variation not only in the international arena but also in the domestic political responses. While several states accepted climate change norms and these norms are domestically salient, the United States rejected internationally formed normative commitment. This article suggests that national preference for international norms of climate change in the United States is formed in the contest process between advocates and opponents of climate change norms and seeks to explain it on the basis of norm-centered constructivism. While advocates' claims have not been salient in the United States, cost and equity arguments of opponent are accepted at large. After a long debate, there were some signs of convergence between advocates' and opponents' framing of climate change in terms of the importance of technology development and voluntary, market-based action in reducing CO2. It is plausible to suggest that the climate change norms fail to be salient in the United States and this seems to point to the importance of early framing of normative issue and debate.
참고문헌 (56)
- Associated Press(AP), "Jeffords to Tackle Global Warming", Associated Press(AP), ~ (2001)
- Associated Press(AP), "Jeffords Spars with Whitman Over Power Plant Pollutant, Global Warming", Associated Press(AP), ~ (2001)
- Barnett,Michael, "Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel's Road to Oslo", European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), pp.5~36 (1999)
- Bodansky,Daniel, "Bonn Voyage: Kyoto's Uncertain Revival", The National Interest, (Fall), pp.45~55 (2001)
- Burch,K, "Toward a Constructive Comparative Politics in Constructivism and Comparative Politics" (2002), M.E. Sharpe
- Busby, Joshua W, "New Troubles for the West", 박사, pp.2004
- Cass,Loren R, "The Failure of American and European Climate Policy" (2006), State University of New York
- Cass, Loren R, "Measuring the Domestic Salience of International Environmental Norms: Climate Change Norms in America, German and British Climate Policy Debate in The Social Construction of Climate Change" (2007), Ashgate
- Checkel,Jeffrey T, "International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide", European Journal of International Relations, 3(4), pp.473~495 (1997)
- Christianson,Gale E, "Greenhouse: The 200-Year Story of Global Warming" (1999), Penguin Books
- The Economics of Global Warming, "Cline,W", Institute for International Economics, ~ (1992)
- Cortell, Andrew P, "Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda", International Studies Review, 2(1), pp.65~87 (2000)
- Council of Economic Advisors, "The Kyoto Protocol and the President's Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis" (1998), Executive Office of the President
- Washington DC:Department of State, "Department of State.2007.U.S.Climate Action Report", Washington DC:Department of State, ~ (2006)
- The Strategic Framing of Political Issues: The Case of the Gays in the Military Debate, "Dion,Robert", Indiana University, ~ (2000)
- Farrell,T, "Constructivism Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program", International Studies Review, 4(1), pp.49~72 (2002)
- Fearon, James, "Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View in Handbook of International Relations" (2003), SAGE Publications
- Financial Times, "US Lifts Carbon Gas Emission Forecast", Financial Times, ~ (1997)
- Finnemore, Martha, "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change", International Organization, 52(4), pp.887~917 (1998)
- Haas,Peter M, "Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination", International Organization, 46(1) (1992)
- Jepperson, R, "Norms, Identity and Culture on National Security in The Culture of National Security" (1996), Columbia University Press
- Kowert, P, "Norms, Identity and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise in The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press" (1996), Columbia University Press
- Kratochwil, Friedrich, "nternational Organization: A State of Art and Art of the State", International Organization, 40(4), pp.753~775 (1986)
- Layzer,Judith A, "The Environmental Case: Translating Values into Policy. 2nd edition." (2006), CQ Press
- Lisowski,Michael, "Playing Two-Level Game: US President Bush's Decision To Repudiate the Kyoto Protocol", Environmental Politics, 11(4), pp.101~119 (2002)
- Luterbacher, Urs, "International Relations and Global Climate Change" (2001), MIT Press
- Milner,Helen, "Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations" (1997), Princeton University Press
- Moore,Thomas Gale, "Why Global Warming Would be Good for You", Public Interest, (Winter), pp.83~99 (1995)
- Moore,Thomas Gale, "Climate of Fear: Why We Shouldn't Worry About Global Warming" (1998), Cato Institute
- National Energy Policy Development Group, "National Energy Policy: Reliable, Affordable and Environmentally Sound Energy for America's Future", National Energy Policy Development Group, ~ (2001)
- New York Times, "US Industries Oppose Emission Proposals", New York Times, ~ (1995)
- New York Times, "Industrial Group Plans to Battle Climate Treaty", New York Times, ~ (1998)
- New York Times, "U.S. Signs a Pact to Reduce Gases Tied to Warming", New York Times, ~ (1998)
- New York Times, "In President's Words: 'A Leadership Role on the Issue of Climate Change", New York Times, ~ (2001)
- Newell,Peter, "Climate For Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- O'Neill, Kate, J. Balsiger, "Actors, Norms, and Impact: Recent International Cooperation Theory and the Influence of the Agent-Structure Debate", Annual Review of Political Science, 7, pp.149~175 (2004)
- Paarlberg, Robert, "Earth in Abeyance: Explaining Weak Leadership in US International Environmental Policy in Eagle Drift: American Foreign Policy at the End of the Century" (1997), Longman
- Pettenger, Mary E, "The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms and Discourses" (2007), Ashgate
- Pew Center on Global Climate Change, "Climate Change Activities in the United States-2004 Update" (2004), Pew Center
- Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, "Americans Support Action On Global Warming", ~ (1997)
- Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, "Bush's Base Backs Him To The Hilt", ~ (2001)
- Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, "Bush Unpopular in Europe, Seen As Unilateralist", ~ (2001)
- Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, "Little Consensus On Global Warming", ~ (2006)
- Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, "Declining Public Support for Global Engagement", ~ (2008)
- Program on International Policy Attitudes(PIPA), "Americans on the Global Warming Treaty", PIPA, ~ (2000)
- Rabe,Barry, "Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy" (2004), Brookings Institution Press
- Risse,Thomas, "Let's Argue: Communicative Action in World Politics", International Organization, 54(1), pp.1~39 (2000)
- Sprinz, Detlef, "The Interest-based Explanation of International Environmental Policy", International Organization, 48(1), pp.77~105 (1994)
- Sussman,Glen, "The USA and Global Environmental Policy: Domestic Constraints on Effective Leadership", International Political Science Review, 25(4), pp.349~369 (2004)
- U.S.Congress, "Congressional Record", 05th Congress, 통권 : 143, pp.S8113~S8119 (1997)
- U.S.Congress, "Congressional Record", 105th Congress, 통권 : 144, pp.S12309~S12312 (1998)
- U.S.Congress, "Congressional Record", 06th Congress, 통권 : 146, pp.S10438~ (2000)
- U.S.Congress, "Congressional Record", 108th Congress, 통권 : 149, pp.S13527~S13600 (2003)
- U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relatio, "Implications of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change", 105th Congress Hearing 2nd Session (1998), Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
- Washington Post, "Clinton Details Global Warming Plan", ~ (1997)
- Washington Post, "CNN Stops Airing Ad Campaign", ~ (1997)