「閔翁傳」의 ‘민옹-화자’ 구도로 보는 해학과 풍자 - 『史記列傳』과의 비교를 겸하여 -
Humor and Satire from the Structure of Min Yusin and the Narrator: with a Comparison with Shiji Liezhuan
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
「Minongjeon(閔翁傳), Tale of Min Yusin」 actively intervene not only the protagonist Min Yusin, but the narrator by maintaining and emphasizing the relationship between Min Yusin and the narrator. This paper contemplates the projection of the development of their peer relationship by employing the element of humor and satire as literary devices. Taking a progressive and original view for the period, Yunam applied what he learned from The Records of the Grand Historian (史記) to his creation. Furthermore, by understanding and modifying The Records of the Grand Historian with various considerations including Yunam not only utilized literary figures of speeches, but also accommodated the content and Sima Qian’s thoughts in depth. An examination of the conflict between Min Yusin’s ideals and reality and the narrator’s internally influential relationship with Min Yusin affirms that Minongjeon delivers the subject circuitously. Min Yusin and the narrator’s relationship involves elements of encountering, sharing through a sense of kinship, and parting over the course of their deepening friendship. Because the narrator’s depression is not quite cured, it becomes clear that the humor and satire shared between Min Yusin and the narrator do not address the depression’s fundamental cause. Inner frustration and empathy toward the object of humor penetrates the inner sense of humor and satire and relates to the figuration and context of the theme of the Biography of Qu Yuan and Jia Sheng (屈原賈生列傳). Through Yunam Pak Chiwon’s Shiji (史記), a related record, it can be confirmed that the bestirringrite relates to Shiji and is arranged consistently throughout the beginning and the end of Minongjeon. In particular, but focusing on humorous factors, Yunam actively engaged in expressing the distress of characters who, at the time, struggled to adjust to the rapidly changing society. Moreover, Yunam reinvented the ubiquitous psychology of human conflict and the cycle of frustration, joy, sorrow, and consolation by grafting humor and satire into Minongjeon(閔翁傳) and empathizing with the audience.
Abstract
「Minongjeon(閔翁傳), Tale of Min Yusin」 actively intervene not only the protagonist Min Yusin, but the narrator by maintaining and emphasizing the relationship between Min Yusin and the narrator. This paper contemplates the projection of the development of their peer relationship by employing the element of humor and satire as literary devices. Taking a progressive and original view for the period, Yunam applied what he learned from The Records of the Grand Historian (史記) to his creation. Furthermore, by understanding and modifying The Records of the Grand Historian with various considerations including Yunam not only utilized literary figures of speeches, but also accommodated the content and Sima Qian’s thoughts in depth. An examination of the conflict between Min Yusin’s ideals and reality and the narrator’s internally influential relationship with Min Yusin affirms that Minongjeon delivers the subject circuitously. Min Yusin and the narrator’s relationship involves elements of encountering, sharing through a sense of kinship, and parting over the course of their deepening friendship. Because the narrator’s depression is not quite cured, it becomes clear that the humor and satire shared between Min Yusin and the narrator do not address the depression’s fundamental cause. Inner frustration and empathy toward the object of humor penetrates the inner sense of humor and satire and relates to the figuration and context of the theme of the Biography of Qu Yuan and Jia Sheng (屈原賈生列傳). Through Yunam Pak Chiwon’s Shiji (史記), a related record, it can be confirmed that the bestirringrite relates to Shiji and is arranged consistently throughout the beginning and the end of Minongjeon. In particular, but focusing on humorous factors, Yunam actively engaged in expressing the distress of characters who, at the time, struggled to adjust to the rapidly changing society. Moreover, Yunam reinvented the ubiquitous psychology of human conflict and the cycle of frustration, joy, sorrow, and consolation by grafting humor and satire into Minongjeon(閔翁傳) and empathizing with the audience.
참고문헌 (46)
- 신호열, "燕巖集 (상)", pp.1~484 (2018), 돌베개
- 신호열, "燕巖集 (중)", pp.1~545 (2018), 돌베개
- 신호열, "燕巖集 (하)", pp.1~593 (2018), 돌베개
- 단국대학교 동양학연구원, "燕巖集 附錄․過庭錄", pp.1~319 (2012), 문예원
- 사마천, "史記列傳 1", pp.1~873 (2020), 민음사
- 사마천, "史記列傳 2", pp.1~895 (2020), 민음사
- 맹자, "孟子", pp.1~504 (2021), 휴머니스트
- 김영동, "박지원소설연구", pp.1~388 (1988), 태학사
- 김학동, "비교문학", pp.1~372 (1996), 새문사
- 劉若愚, "中國의 文學理論", pp.196~197 (1993), 명문당
- 모튼 거위치, "희극 또는 골계 비합리적 시각", pp.33~35 (2020), 민속원
- 박수밀, "박지원의 미의식과 문예 이론", pp.1~280 (2005), 태학사
- 박희병, "나의 아버지 박지원", pp.1~437 (1998), 돌베개
- 이가원, "연암소설연구", pp.1~236 (1988), 을유문화사
- 이창용, "비교문학의 이론", pp.314~ (1990), 일지사
- 임형택, "연암 박지원 연구", pp.1~409 (2012), 사람의 무늬
- 조동일, "소설의 사회사 비교론 1", pp.1~111 (2001), 지식산업사
- 조동일, "한국문학사상사시론", pp.312~336 (2016), 지식산업사
- 최광석, "고전소설의 구조론적 이해", pp.1~212 (2010), 역락
- 황패강, "｢호질｣연구-문학적 상징체계와 사회적 맥락", 한국소설문학의 탐구, pp.219~ (1978)
- 보나르, "우정의 진실", pp.1~300 (1977), 성한
- 姜賢模, "閔翁傳 硏究", 韓國學論集, 15, pp.213~242 (1989), 한양대학교 한국학연구소
- 김명호, "이조후기 한문학의 재조명", pp.48~55 (1983), 창비사
- 김원중, "『史記』 「屈原賈生列傳」을 통해서 본 司馬遷의 치유적 글쓰기 전략 - 發憤과 憐愍의 승화 차원을 심으로", 동북아 문화연구, 1(59), pp.235~252 (2019), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- "민족문학사연구", 2006, 148~170, pp.민족문학사연구소
- 문영오, "燕岩小設에서의 恨의 屈折樣相(2) : ｢閔翁傳｣과 ｢虞裳傳｣을 中心으로", 韓國文學硏究, 2, pp.187~202 (1985), 경기대학교한국문학연구소
- 민병수, "한국 소설 발달사", pp.1~200 (1967), 고대 민족문화연구소
- 문영오, "｢閔翁傳｣考究", 道敎文化硏究, 7, pp.167~193 (1993), 한국도교문화학회
- 박기석, "｢閔翁傳｣ 연구", 고전문학과 교육, 6, pp.145~161 (2002), 한국고전문학교육학회
- 박인희, "「민옹전」에 등장하는 壁書의 의미", 석당논총, (66), pp.1~30 (2016), 석당학술원[DOI]
- 심은경, "<閔翁傳>의 ‘민옹-화자’의 교유 －『孟子』의 교우관과 비교를 겸하여－", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), 66(66), pp.155~191 (2021), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)
- 신혜금, "문학치료의 과정으로 본 「민옹전」", 영주어문, 18, pp.87~110 (2009), 영주어문학회
- 우지영, "문답식 산문의 특징에 대한 연구 -李奎報의 문답식 산문을 중심으로-", 동방한문학, (50), pp.495~523 (2012), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 이동환, "연암의 사유양식", 한국한문학연구, 11, pp.11~15 (1988), 한국한문학회
- 이민희, "심리 치료 측면에서 본 <閔翁傳> 小考", 고전문학연구, (31), pp.429~459 (2007), 한국고전문학회[DOI]
- 이승우, "｢閔翁傳｣의 장르 再考", 전농어문연구, 20, pp.113~139 (2008), 서울市立大學校 문리과대학 국어국문학과
- 이우성, "한국의 역사상", pp.1~185 (1982), 창비사
- 임형택, "박연암의 우정론과 윤리의식의 방향", 한국한문학연구, 1, pp.95~117 (1976), 한국한문학회
- 임형택, "박지원의 주체의식과 세계인식", 東洋學國際學術會議論文集, 3, pp.81~100 (1985), 成均館大學校 大東文化硏究院
- 조도현, "<閔翁傳>을 통해 본 조선후기 이야기꾼의 존재와 고전소설 유통의 의미 탐색", 어문연구, 69, pp.189~212 (2011), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 차용주, "연암연구", pp.281~487 (1984), 계명대학교출판부
- 최광석, "<민옹전> 소재 재담의 발상과 재담 교육 텍스트로서의 가치", 어문학, (102), pp.287~313 (2008), 한국어문학회
- 崔淑仁, "朝鮮 後期 文學에 나타난 繪畵性 硏究 : 燕巖계열의 詩를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1989
- 최신호, "연암의 문학론에서 본 사물인식과 창작의식", 한국한문학연구, 8, pp.89~110 (1985), 한국한문학회
- 황인덕, "‘이야기꾼’으로 본 ｢閔翁傳｣의 ‘민옹’", 구비문학연구, 8, pp.67~98 (1999), 한국구비문학회
- "한국고전종합DB"[URL]