Reliability and validity test of the Korean version of Noe's evaluation
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aims to demonstrate whether the functionalities between the widely used questionnaire in other countries and the Korean-translated version show similarity. Also, it intends to verify their reliability and validity. Methods: The original questionnaire was first developed by professor Noe at the University of Minnesota with 29 items named as “mentoring functions” to identify the participants’ psychological and career-development functions. Using the Korean-translated version of the original questionnaire, the study was conducted on total 288 Kyung Hee University medical students, ranging from the first-year students to the third-year students on December 2015. In order to investigate if the survey form could be applied to the Korean participants, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted, using varimax rotation. Cronbach α statistics and the figures of standardized regression weights were analyzed respectively to indicate construct, convergent, and discriminant validities. Results: The result of exploratory factor analysis shows there are a total of three functions, including the additional “friendship function” (Eigen value, 1.152; significant level if higher than 1.0) with its high emphasis. The result of confirmatory factor analysis also demonstrates the similarity (p=0.000). As the whole reliability scale of the three functions is significantly high (Cronbach α, 0.971), each reliability scales of the three functions are shown to be high (0.814–0.955) as well. Conclusion: The model, with its three functions, proved the significant statistics regarding the reliability and validity. According to this ground, the conclusion is that the adapted questionnaire used in this study could be applied to Korean medical students.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to demonstrate whether the functionalities between the widely used questionnaire in other countries and the Korean-translated version show similarity. Also, it intends to verify their reliability and validity. Methods: The original questionnaire was first developed by professor Noe at the University of Minnesota with 29 items named as “mentoring functions” to identify the participants’ psychological and career-development functions. Using the Korean-translated version of the original questionnaire, the study was conducted on total 288 Kyung Hee University medical students, ranging from the first-year students to the third-year students on December 2015. In order to investigate if the survey form could be applied to the Korean participants, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted, using varimax rotation. Cronbach α statistics and the figures of standardized regression weights were analyzed respectively to indicate construct, convergent, and discriminant validities. Results: The result of exploratory factor analysis shows there are a total of three functions, including the additional “friendship function” (Eigen value, 1.152; significant level if higher than 1.0) with its high emphasis. The result of confirmatory factor analysis also demonstrates the similarity (p=0.000). As the whole reliability scale of the three functions is significantly high (Cronbach α, 0.971), each reliability scales of the three functions are shown to be high (0.814–0.955) as well. Conclusion: The model, with its three functions, proved the significant statistics regarding the reliability and validity. According to this ground, the conclusion is that the adapted questionnaire used in this study could be applied to Korean medical students.
참고문헌 (21)
- 신홍임, "“I’m Not Happy, But I Don’t Care”: Help-Seeking Behavior, Academic Difficulties, and Happiness", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(1), pp.7~14 (2011), 한국의학교육학회
- Fornari A, "Mentoring program design and implementation in new medical schools", Med Educ Online, 19, pp.24570~ (2014)
- Sanfey H, "Strategies for building an effective mentoring relationship", Am J Surg, 206, pp.714~718 (2013)
- 배진형, "멘토링 활동 참여 경험에서의 멘토의 성장과 도전- H대학교 멘토링 프로그램의 평가 사례를 중심으로 -", 사회복지실천과 연구, 11, pp.95~144 (2014), 사회복지연구소
- Noe RA, "An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships", Pers Psychol, 41, pp.457~479 (1988)
- Kram KE, "Phases of the mentor relationship", Acad Manag J, 26, pp.608~625 (1983)
- Nunnally JC, "Psychometric theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill
- 주영주, "사이버대학에서의 강좌평가를 위한 측정도구 개발 및 양호도 검증", 정보교육학회논문지, 12(1), pp.109~120 (2008), 한국정보교육학회
- Lee HS, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS 6.0", pp.32~35 (2007), Bobmunsa
- Son SJ, "The moderating role of trust in formal mentoring relationships in Korea", Asia Pac J Hum Resour, 54, pp.57~58 (2016)
- Ono K, "Succession of the mentor role and the experience of proteges among Japanese workers", Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (2003)
- Fowler JL, "Mentoring functions: a contemporary view of the perceptions of mentees and mentors", Br J Manag, 16, pp.51~57 (2005)
- Özkalp E, "Mentoring revisited from the perspective of mentors in learning process: the case study of Anadolu University in Turkey", Paper presented at: University Forum for Human Resource Development (2006)
- Kaderli R, "Female surgeons' mentoring experiences and success in an academic career in Switzerland", Swiss Med Wkly, 141, pp.w13233~ (2011)
- Gong R, "Does mentoring work? The mediating effect of mentoring in China", Soc Behav Pers, 39, pp.807~824 (2011)
- Allen TD, "The state of mentoring research: a qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications", J Vocat Behav, 73, pp.343~357 (2008)
- Scandura TA, "Mentorship and career mobility: an empirical investigation", J Organ Behav, 13, pp.169~174 (1992)
- Ramanan RA, "Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction", Am J Med, 112, pp.336~341 (2002)
- Frei E, "Mentoring programs for medical students: a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008", BMC Med Educ, 10, pp.32~ (2010)
- Sambunjak D, "A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine", J Gen Intern Med, 25, pp.72~78 (2010)
- Chen MM, "A multifaceted mentoring program for junior faculty in academic pediatrics", Teach Learn Med, 28, pp.320~328 (2016)