Construction and validation of a mentoring questionnaire based on Islamic culture
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Education is considered to be a cultural and value-driven matter where any intervention in this field requires certain tools in order to describe the status quo. The current study, while taking into account the contextual texts related to Islamic mentoring, seeks to develop a tool to quantify this concept, as well as introduce the respective psychometric properties. A 113 items questionnaire was designed after reviewing the literature, the recommended guidelines concerning Islamic mentor and mentee, and reviewing available international tools. Content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated based on several criteria of clarity, fitness, and comprehensiveness by a survey of 10 experts and the necessary corrections were made. In the primary phase of this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were evaluated by collecting the data from a random sample of 213 Iranian Ph.D.students in Tehran Universities of Medical Sciences. The factors analysis results show that 70 items, in the form of nine factors, construct the Islamic monitoring. Furthermore, The Cronbach’s α coefficient was determined for each factor and the entire questionnaire. Total reliability of the scale was obtained at 0.97. Considering the confirmed validity and reliability of the questionnaire, this tool can be highly beneficial for the experts and education professionals, particularly in the field of medicine, for the assessment and establishment of mentoring.
Abstract
Education is considered to be a cultural and value-driven matter where any intervention in this field requires certain tools in order to describe the status quo. The current study, while taking into account the contextual texts related to Islamic mentoring, seeks to develop a tool to quantify this concept, as well as introduce the respective psychometric properties. A 113 items questionnaire was designed after reviewing the literature, the recommended guidelines concerning Islamic mentor and mentee, and reviewing available international tools. Content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated based on several criteria of clarity, fitness, and comprehensiveness by a survey of 10 experts and the necessary corrections were made. In the primary phase of this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were evaluated by collecting the data from a random sample of 213 Iranian Ph.D.students in Tehran Universities of Medical Sciences. The factors analysis results show that 70 items, in the form of nine factors, construct the Islamic monitoring. Furthermore, The Cronbach’s α coefficient was determined for each factor and the entire questionnaire. Total reliability of the scale was obtained at 0.97. Considering the confirmed validity and reliability of the questionnaire, this tool can be highly beneficial for the experts and education professionals, particularly in the field of medicine, for the assessment and establishment of mentoring.
참고문헌 (21)
- Wenger E, "Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice", pp.179~198 (2010), Springer
- Schunk DH, "Learning theories: an educational perspective" (2012), Pearson
- Kram KE, "Phases of the mentor relationship", Acad Manag J, 26(4), pp.608~625 (1983)
- Johnson WB, "A framework for conceptualizing competence to mentor", Ethics Behav, 13(2), pp.127~151 (2003)
- Haggard DL, "Who is a mentor? : a review of evolving definitions and implications for research", J Manag, 37(1), pp.280~304 (2011)
- Grossman SC, "Mentoring in nursing: a dynamic and collaborative process" (2013), Springer Publishing Company
- Ghosh R, "Mentors providing challenge and support:integrating concepts from teacher mentoring in education and organizational mentoring in business", Hum Resour Dev Rev, 12(2), pp.144~176 (2013)
- Noe RA, "An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships", Pers Psychol, 41(3), pp.457~479 (1988)
- Ackroyd R, "Mentoring for new consultants", J R Coll Physicians Edinb, 45(2), pp.143~147 (2015)
- Fleming M, "The mentoring competency assessment : validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors", Acad Med, 88(7), pp.1002~1008 (2013)
- Anderson L, "Evaluating and giving feedback to mentors : new evidence-based approaches", Clin Transl Sci, 5(1), pp.71~77 (2012)
- Bazargan A, "Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods" (2010), Didar
- Aveyard H, "Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide" (2014), Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education
- Hooman HA, "Educational and psychological measure ments" (2013), Parsa
- Lynn MR, "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nurs Res, 35(6), pp.382~385 (1986)
- Lawshe CH, "A quantitative approach to content validity", Pers Psychol, 28(4), pp.563~575 (1975)
- Sambunjak D, "Mentoring in academic medicine : a systematic review", JAMA, 296(9), pp.1103~1115 (2006)
- Straus SE, "Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships : a qualitative study across two academic health centers", Acad Med, 88(1), pp.82~89 (2013)
- Akili W, "On mentoring relationships: how to become a good mentor", Paper presented at: 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (2013)
- Perry RE, "Developing effective mentor-mentee relationships in radiology", J Am Coll Radiol, 15(2), pp.328~333 (2018)
- Kram KE, "Mentoring alternatives : the role of peer relationships in career development", Acad Manag J, 28(1), pp.110~132 (1985)