본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대중국어 부정문의 간접 화행 연구: 의사소통의 관점에서

A Study on the Indirect Speech Act of Negative Sentences in Modern Chinese: from the Point of Communication

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study aims to show the communicative effectiveness by using negative sentences as an indirect speech act conveying various meanings in the course of communication. First, the study took an overview of the speech act theory, and then explained the difference between a direct speech act and an indirect speech act. Second. it discussed four types of negative sentences used as an indirect speech act, such as negative declarative sentences, negative interrogative sentences, negative imperative sentences, and negative exclamatory sentences. Third, it discussed about the relation of an indirect speech act and politeness based on the theory of Lakoff and Brown & Levinson. Fourth, the discussion about the communicative effectiveness by the use of negative sentences as an indirect speech act is as follows. 1) Negative declarative sentences are often used to indirectly express ‘suggestion’, ‘refusal’, ‘recommendation’, ‘request’, ‘reproach’ etc, decreasing the face threat of the listener, from which the listener gets comfort easily. 2) Negative interrogative sentences are frequently used to euphemistically express ‘reproach’, ‘recommendation’, ‘refutation, ‘protest’ etc rather than ‘question’, which brings about communicative effectiveness by decreasing the face threat of the listener. 3) Negative imperative sentences are also used for expressing indirectly and euphemistically ‘suggestion’, ‘warning’, ‘advice’, ‘recommendation’ etc rather than ‘order’, which tends to decrease the listener’s psychological stress and burden, through which the listener easily accepts the delivered contents. 4) Negative exclamatory sentences are very often used to indirectly and softly express ‘self consolness’, ‘complaint’, ‘monologue’, ‘ridicule’, ‘reproach’, ‘comfort’ etc, decreasing the threat of either the speaker’s face or the listener’s face, which brings about the communicative effectiveness. The conclusion is that the use of negative sentences as an indirect speech act is an useful tool for communicative effectiveness in the course of daily communication.

Abstract

This study aims to show the communicative effectiveness by using negative sentences as an indirect speech act conveying various meanings in the course of communication. First, the study took an overview of the speech act theory, and then explained the difference between a direct speech act and an indirect speech act. Second. it discussed four types of negative sentences used as an indirect speech act, such as negative declarative sentences, negative interrogative sentences, negative imperative sentences, and negative exclamatory sentences. Third, it discussed about the relation of an indirect speech act and politeness based on the theory of Lakoff and Brown & Levinson. Fourth, the discussion about the communicative effectiveness by the use of negative sentences as an indirect speech act is as follows. 1) Negative declarative sentences are often used to indirectly express ‘suggestion’, ‘refusal’, ‘recommendation’, ‘request’, ‘reproach’ etc, decreasing the face threat of the listener, from which the listener gets comfort easily. 2) Negative interrogative sentences are frequently used to euphemistically express ‘reproach’, ‘recommendation’, ‘refutation, ‘protest’ etc rather than ‘question’, which brings about communicative effectiveness by decreasing the face threat of the listener. 3) Negative imperative sentences are also used for expressing indirectly and euphemistically ‘suggestion’, ‘warning’, ‘advice’, ‘recommendation’ etc rather than ‘order’, which tends to decrease the listener’s psychological stress and burden, through which the listener easily accepts the delivered contents. 4) Negative exclamatory sentences are very often used to indirectly and softly express ‘self consolness’, ‘complaint’, ‘monologue’, ‘ridicule’, ‘reproach’, ‘comfort’ etc, decreasing the threat of either the speaker’s face or the listener’s face, which brings about the communicative effectiveness. The conclusion is that the use of negative sentences as an indirect speech act is an useful tool for communicative effectiveness in the course of daily communication.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산 동아
  2. 이범열, "현대중국어 부가의문문의 화행 기능과 의사소통 효과", 중국인문과학, 73, pp.159~ (2019), 중국인문학회
  3. 정희자, "담화와 추론", pp.139~ (2004), 한국문화사
  4. 채춘옥, "한․중 언어에서 요청 화행과 거절 화행의 대조 연구", 중어중문학, 62, pp.121~151 (2015), 한국중어중문학회
  5. 程誠, "漢語“請求”言語行為的句法表現,語用策略及其教學—以義大利漢語學習者為例", 碩士, pp.2018
  6. 高翼, "論間接言語行為在禮貌策略中的語用功能", 遵義師範學院學報, 4(1), pp.45~46 (2002), 遵義師範學院
  7. 賈麗媛, "間接言語行為與禮貌", 長春教育學院學報, 27(4), pp.29~30 (2011), 長春教育學院
  8. 李虹, "請求言語行爲中的原型範疇", 遼寧工程技術大學學報, 社會科學版, 13(6), pp.629~631 (2011), 遼寧工程技術大學
  9. 梁婷, "請求策略中常規間接請求策略的語用分析", 貴陽學院學報, 社會科學版, (3)통권 : 27, pp.89~91 (2012), 貴陽學院
  10. 馬杰, "韓․中否定句間接言語行爲對比硏究", 碩士, 亞非語言文學, pp.2011
  11. 余冬梅, "「間接請求」言語行爲模式調査——以雲南省景谷縣傣族表「請求」預示話語為例", 長春理工大學學報, 5(8), pp.98~100 (2010), 長春理工大學
  12. Austin, J. L., "How to Do Things with Words", pp.94~107 (1962), Clarendon Press
  13. Brown, P., "Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction", pp.56~290 (1978), Cambridge University Press
  14. Gazdar, G., "Elements of Discourse Understanding", pp.64~83 (1981), Cambridge University Press
  15. Lakoff, R., "The Logic of Politeness; or Minding Your P’s and Q’s", CLS, 9, pp.292~305 (1973)
  16. Searle, J. R., "The Classification of Illocutionary Acts", Language in Society, 5, pp.1~23 (1976)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)