본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대중국어 부가의문문의 화행 기능과 의사소통 효과

Speech act and communication effects of attaching a tag question in Mandarin Chinese.

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper aims to study the function of speech acts and communicative effects carried by means of attaching a tag question to the end of such a sentence as declarative sentence, imperative sentence, exclamatory sentence, and rhetorical question. The paper discusses the presupposition that the hearer needs to know the background information about the information delivered by the speaker. It also discuses four types of Chinese tag questions, such as ‘X嗎?’, ‘X吧?’, ‘X不X?’, ‘不X嗎?’. The ‘declaration’ of the speaker’s views or opinion expressed in a declarative sentence is changed to the speaker’s ‘request’, ‘blame’, ‘excuse’, ‘assertion’ etc by means of attaching a tag question to the end of the declarative sentence. The attachment of a tag question to the end of an imperative sentence with a soft tone changes the speaker’s ‘order’ to ‘advice’, ‘refusal’ to ‘persuasion’, ‘request’ to ‘urgent request’, which may easily get the hearer to cooperate for the conversation. However, the tag question with a strong tone attached to the end of an imperative sentence tends to change the speaker’s ‘order’ to ‘threat’, which may force the hearer to satisfy the speaker’s requirement without complaining. The speaker’s ‘compliment’ expressed in an exclamatory sentence tends to be changed to ‘request’ for the hearer’s approval by means of attaching a tag question to the end of the exclamatory sentence, which have naturally the hearer participate in the conversation. The speaker’s ‘statement’ expressed in a rhetorical question tends to be changed to ‘assertion’, ‘tease’ to ‘blame’, ‘cynicism’ to ‘suggestion’ by means of attaching a tag question to the end of the rhetorical question. These changes of speech act through attaching a tag question have a great influence on the effects of communication in an either affirmative or negative way.

Abstract

This paper aims to study the function of speech acts and communicative effects carried by means of attaching a tag question to the end of such a sentence as declarative sentence, imperative sentence, exclamatory sentence, and rhetorical question. The paper discusses the presupposition that the hearer needs to know the background information about the information delivered by the speaker. It also discuses four types of Chinese tag questions, such as ‘X嗎?’, ‘X吧?’, ‘X不X?’, ‘不X嗎?’. The ‘declaration’ of the speaker’s views or opinion expressed in a declarative sentence is changed to the speaker’s ‘request’, ‘blame’, ‘excuse’, ‘assertion’ etc by means of attaching a tag question to the end of the declarative sentence. The attachment of a tag question to the end of an imperative sentence with a soft tone changes the speaker’s ‘order’ to ‘advice’, ‘refusal’ to ‘persuasion’, ‘request’ to ‘urgent request’, which may easily get the hearer to cooperate for the conversation. However, the tag question with a strong tone attached to the end of an imperative sentence tends to change the speaker’s ‘order’ to ‘threat’, which may force the hearer to satisfy the speaker’s requirement without complaining. The speaker’s ‘compliment’ expressed in an exclamatory sentence tends to be changed to ‘request’ for the hearer’s approval by means of attaching a tag question to the end of the exclamatory sentence, which have naturally the hearer participate in the conversation. The speaker’s ‘statement’ expressed in a rhetorical question tends to be changed to ‘assertion’, ‘tease’ to ‘blame’, ‘cynicism’ to ‘suggestion’ by means of attaching a tag question to the end of the rhetorical question. These changes of speech act through attaching a tag question have a great influence on the effects of communication in an either affirmative or negative way.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 이범열, "현대중국어의 담화화용론" (2012), 한국문화사
  2. 이범열, "현대중국어의 은유와 환유 그리고 의사소통" (2018), 한국문화사
  3. 이윤경, "중국어 부가의문문의 담화 기능에 대한 고찰", 담화와 인지, 25(2), pp.73~95 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  4. 이준호, "현대중국어 '是' 부가의문문의 담화기능 연구", 석사, 중어중문학과, pp.2012
  5. 이지원, "현대중국어 ‘是(shi)’ 부가의문문 형태의 질문-대답인접쌍에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 21(1), pp.83~103 (2014), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  6. 高華, "英漢附加問句在會話中的傳信功能", 安徽電氣工程職業技術學院學報, 14(2), pp.80~83 (2009), 安徽電子信息職業技術學院;安徽省電子學會
  7. 李鹹菊, "北京話話語標記“是不是”“是吧”探析", 語言教學與研究, 2, pp.83~89 (2009), 北京語言大學
  8. 李佐文, "陳述性附加疑問句的意義", 河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 26(4), pp.92~95 (2001)
  9. 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (1982), 商務印書館
  10. 邵敬敏, "“X不X”附加問研究", 江蘇師範大學學報:哲學社會科學版, (4), pp.86~90 (1990), 江蘇師範大學
  11. 閆亞平, "現代漢語附加問句硏究" (2017), 世紀出版集團
  12. 虞海村, "作為話語標記語的“是吧”", 沙洋師範高等專科學校學報, 12(3), pp.50~53 (2011), 荊楚理工學院
  13. Austin, J. L., "How to Do Things with Words" (1962), Clarendon Press
  14. Li, C. N., "Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
  15. Searle, J. R., "Speech Acts" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  16. Searle, J. R., "The Classification of Illocutionary Acts", Language in Society, 5, pp.1~23 (1976)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)