본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

新聞社説における外来語の意味分類に関する日韓対照研究- 『分類語彙表(増補改訂版)』を基に -

A Japanese-Korean Comparative Study on the Semantic Classification of Foreign Words in Newspaper Editorials

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

In this paper, we surveyed newspaper editorials in both Japanese and Korean languages, and conducted a manual extraction survey of foreign words from editorials for 10 years (2013 to 2022). The samples obtained from this survey consisted of the number of editorials (Japanese) 6,592: (Korean) 8,977, the total number of characters) 1,555 words: (Korean) 1,035 words", the total number of words is “(Japanese) 39,590 words: (Korean) 26,167 words”. Using the top 100 words counted as high-frequency loanwords from this survey data, we classified the semantic fields based on the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (2004) “Classification Vocabulary Table (Enlarged and Revised Edition)”. First, the distribution of major classifications was common to both languages, with the noun “type of body” accounting for more than 90%. There were very few verb-related “用の類” and adjective-like “相の類”. However, based on the “Classification Vocabulary Table”, it is classified as “体の類”, but according to the research results of Kishimoto (2023) from a different perspective, some words are classified into nouns and verbs. touched. Words classified as verbs are “service, share, check, lead” in Japanese and “브리핑, 쇼핑, 인터뷰” in Korean. Next, in the middle classification, the distribution of “abstract relations” in Japanese and “human activity” in Korean was the most common. Furthermore, what is common to both languages is that six words overlap in the distribution of “language” in the “abstract relation” subclass. Among the subcategories, what is characteristic is that four words overlap in the field of “communications,” but there are also words related to the technology field. Korean) 빅데이터 was to be included. The results of the survey are a reflection of foreign- language products circulating at the time, but it remains to be seen how the results would change if the survey were to cover items other than editorials.

Abstract

In this paper, we surveyed newspaper editorials in both Japanese and Korean languages, and conducted a manual extraction survey of foreign words from editorials for 10 years (2013 to 2022). The samples obtained from this survey consisted of the number of editorials (Japanese) 6,592: (Korean) 8,977, the total number of characters) 1,555 words: (Korean) 1,035 words", the total number of words is “(Japanese) 39,590 words: (Korean) 26,167 words”. Using the top 100 words counted as high-frequency loanwords from this survey data, we classified the semantic fields based on the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (2004) “Classification Vocabulary Table (Enlarged and Revised Edition)”. First, the distribution of major classifications was common to both languages, with the noun “type of body” accounting for more than 90%. There were very few verb-related “用の類” and adjective-like “相の類”. However, based on the “Classification Vocabulary Table”, it is classified as “体の類”, but according to the research results of Kishimoto (2023) from a different perspective, some words are classified into nouns and verbs. touched. Words classified as verbs are “service, share, check, lead” in Japanese and “브리핑, 쇼핑, 인터뷰” in Korean. Next, in the middle classification, the distribution of “abstract relations” in Japanese and “human activity” in Korean was the most common. Furthermore, what is common to both languages is that six words overlap in the distribution of “language” in the “abstract relation” subclass. Among the subcategories, what is characteristic is that four words overlap in the field of “communications,” but there are also words related to the technology field. Korean) 빅데이터 was to be included. The results of the survey are a reflection of foreign- language products circulating at the time, but it remains to be seen how the results would change if the survey were to cover items other than editorials.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 石井怜子, "新完全マスター単語日本語能力試験N4重要1000語", pp.83~ (2022), スリーエーネットワーク
  2. 国立国語研究所, "分類語彙表(増補改訂版)", 国立国語研究所, ~ (2004)
  3. 岸本まりこ, "日韓両言語における外来語の量的推移と使用実態に関する対照研究-9年間(2013年から2021年まで)の新聞社説を基に-", 博士, pp.2023
  4. 田中牧郎, "現代社会における外来語の実態", 新"ことば"シリーズ 外来語と現代社会, 19, pp.38~46 (2006), 国立国語研究所
  5. 橋本和佳, "Logistic曲線による外来語増加過程のモデル化-大正から平成までの社説を用いて-", 計量国語学, 25(7), pp.293~308 (2006), 計量国語学会
  6. 橋本和佳, "現代日本語における外来語の量的推移に関する研究", ひつじ研究叢書<言語編>, 86, pp.124~125 (2010), ひつじ書房
  7. 김하수, "한국어 외래어 표현법의 문제점", 배달말, 25, pp.247~259 (1999), 배달말학회
  8. 박동근, "웹 검색을 이용한 맞춤법 오류의 변화 양상 연구 - 사이시옷 표기를 중심으로", 문법 교육, 21, pp.67~93 (2014), 한국문법교육학회
  9. "オピニオン 社説 電子版"[URL]
  10. "오피니언 「사설」 電子版(2013-2021)"[URL]
  11. "WEB茶まめ" (2015)[URL]
  12. 小学館, "日本大百科全書" (1994), 小学館
  13. 三省堂編修所, "カタカナ語辞典" (2020), 三省堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)