An Analysis of Science Teachers’ Stages of Concern and Levels of Use on Descriptive Assessment
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this study was to examine the current status of science teachers’ stage of concern (SOC) and level of use (LoU) on descriptive assessment and determine the relationship between SoC and LoU. To achieve this, concerns-based adoption model (CBAM) was used, and a survey was conducted on 138 science teachers. The data from this study were analyzed by frequency analysis, percentile analysis based on CBAM, χ2 test, and Spearman correlation analysis. SoC and LoU of the science teachers observed in this study are as follows. First, the science teachers’ overall SoC for the descriptive assessment was low and showed a typical pattern of the initial stage when the program was introduced. Second, LoU analysis on descriptive assessment showed that the “mechanical Use” (N=49, 35.5%) or “routine” (N=48, 34.8%) accounted for the majority. Third, the Spearman correlation between SoC and LoU on descriptive assessment was .299(p<.01). This suggests that teachers’ SoC needs to be increased in order to promote higher LoU on descriptive assessment, which requires new alternative measures.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to examine the current status of science teachers’ stage of concern (SOC) and level of use (LoU) on descriptive assessment and determine the relationship between SoC and LoU. To achieve this, concerns-based adoption model (CBAM) was used, and a survey was conducted on 138 science teachers. The data from this study were analyzed by frequency analysis, percentile analysis based on CBAM, χ2 test, and Spearman correlation analysis. SoC and LoU of the science teachers observed in this study are as follows. First, the science teachers’ overall SoC for the descriptive assessment was low and showed a typical pattern of the initial stage when the program was introduced. Second, LoU analysis on descriptive assessment showed that the “mechanical Use” (N=49, 35.5%) or “routine” (N=48, 34.8%) accounted for the majority. Third, the Spearman correlation between SoC and LoU on descriptive assessment was .299(p<.01). This suggests that teachers’ SoC needs to be increased in order to promote higher LoU on descriptive assessment, which requires new alternative measures.
참고문헌 (35)
- 백성혜, "2009 개정 교육과정에 대한 이해당사자 기반 평가 연구 -인문계 고등학교 쟁점사항 선호도를 중심으로-", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 14(6), pp.41~67 (2014), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- Choi, S. W., "The Effect of Method in an Essay Formative Testing Science Studies", pp.2001
- Hong, A. N., "Effects of Science Writing Instruction using Visual Materials on High School Student’s Achievement and Awareness toward Science Essay Test", pp.2013
- Yang, G. S., "A Direction of Student Evaluation and Manufac-ture of Descriptive Assessment" (2006), Pusan Education Office
- Do, J. W., , Edu. Primary School Math, 12, pp.63~ (2009)
- 김래영, "수학과 서술형평가에 대한 중학교 교사들의 인식연구", 수학교육학연구, 23(4), pp.533~551 (2013), 대한수학교육학회
- Kim, S. H, , J. Korean Edu, 40, pp.479~ (2013)
- Sim, A. S., "Study on the Recognition of Teachers and Stu-dents & Actual Conditions about Middle School Science Essay Test", pp.2008
- Choi, S. W., "The Effect of Method in an Essay Formative Testing Science Studies", pp.2011
- 김성기, "중학교 과학과 서술형 평가의 문항 특성 및 요인 분석", 대한화학회지, 59(5), pp.445~453 (2015), 대한화학회[DOI]
- Hord, S. M., "Taking charge of change" (1987), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
- Han, M. H., "The Background and Reason of Curriculum" (1995), Education Science Press
- Jun, Y. M., "Analysis of curriculum level in teaching-learn-ing process", pp.1988
- Lee, H. W., "A Study on teacher’s autonomy in curriculum implementation", pp.1987
- Kim, D. J., , Kor. J. Ed. Res, 30, pp.167~ (1992)
- Fullan, M., "The New Meaning of Educational Change" (2001), Columbia University Press
- Fuller, F. F., , Amer. Edu. Res. J, 6, pp.207~ (1969)
- Ornstein, A. C., "Curriculum : Foundation, Principles, and Issues" (2004), Pearson Education
- Chae. J. H., , Kor. Home Eco. Edu. Ass, 14, pp.37~ (2003)
- 김석우, "성취평가제에 대한 중학교 교사의 관심수준 분석", 수산해양교육연구, 26(1), pp.81~97 (2014), 한국수산해양교육학회
- 최혜정, "중․고등학생의 과학과 자기주도학습에 대한 관심수준 및 실행수준 분석", 과학교육연구지, 39(1), pp.28~43 (2015), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 김석우, "중학교 교사들의 수행평가에 관한 관심도와 실행수준 분석", 교육평가연구, 24(1), pp.31~50 (2011), 한국교육평가학회
- 장재혁, "특성화 고등학교 교사의 성취평가제 관심도 및 실행도 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 18(2), pp.105~129 (2015), 한국교육과정평가원
- 박한숙, "2009 개정 교육과정 창의적 체험활동에 관한 중학교 교사들의 관심도 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 13(4), pp.417~436 (2013), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 김신영, "교사의 학생평가전문성과 중등교사 양성과정", 교육평가연구, 20(1), pp.1~16 (2007), 한국교육평가학회
- Lee, J. K., , J. Sci. Edu, 29, pp.115~ (2004)
- Kim, Y. H., , Bio. Edu, 40, pp.167~ (2012)
- Hong, M. J., , J. Sci. Edu, 30, pp.65~ (2006)
- Hall, G. E., "Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes" (2005), Pearson
- Lee, I. S., , Kor. Home Eco. Edu. Ass, pp.235~ (2011)
- 이대용, "수행평가에 관한 초등학교 교사들의 관심과 실행수준 분석", 초등교육연구, 24(4), pp.235~254 (2011), 한국초등교육학회
- 이지은, "CBAM에 기초한 2007년 개정 교육과정에 대한 교원의 관심도 및 실행도 분석", 교사교육연구, 51(1), pp.137~151 (2012), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- Kim, H. N., "The Development and Issues of Three Diagnos-tic Dimensions of CBAM", pp.2011
- Hall, G. E., "The use of inno-vation configuration maps in assessing implementation:The bridge between development and student outcomes", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2000)
- Hord, S. M., "Measuring Implementation in Schools : Innovation Config-urations" (2006), SEDL