본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2009 개정 초등학교 과학과 교육과정의 융합인재교육(STEAM)에 대한 교사의 관심도와 실행 수준 분석

Analysis of Teachers' Stages of Concern and Levels of Use on STEAM of the 2009 Elementary Science Curriculum

0

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to analyze the teachers' stages of concern and levels of use on STEAM of the 2009 elementary science curriculum and to support effective application according to the teachers' stages and levels. Therefore this study was conducted by the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). The total number of 113 teachers participated in this study. The results of the study were as follows: First, most teachers were in the stage of awareness. Second, the results of the chi-square test showed that the stages were significantly different according to their positions, training experiences and final degrees (p<.05). Third, about half of teachers were in the level of orientation and preparation. The others were in the level of routine, integration and renewal. Fourth, the results of the chi-square test showed that the levels were significantly different with the categories of their gender, position, age, career in education, workplace and training experience (p<.05). Fifth, the correlation coefficient between stages of concern and levels of use (r=.59) was relatively high (p<.05). Based on these results, we suggested that the support of application should be provided according to the teachers' stages and levels.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the teachers' stages of concern and levels of use on STEAM of the 2009 elementary science curriculum and to support effective application according to the teachers' stages and levels. Therefore this study was conducted by the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). The total number of 113 teachers participated in this study. The results of the study were as follows: First, most teachers were in the stage of awareness. Second, the results of the chi-square test showed that the stages were significantly different according to their positions, training experiences and final degrees (p<.05). Third, about half of teachers were in the level of orientation and preparation. The others were in the level of routine, integration and renewal. Fourth, the results of the chi-square test showed that the levels were significantly different with the categories of their gender, position, age, career in education, workplace and training experience (p<.05). Fifth, the correlation coefficient between stages of concern and levels of use (r=.59) was relatively high (p<.05). Based on these results, we suggested that the support of application should be provided according to the teachers' stages and levels.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 배선아, "공업계열 전문계 고등학교 화공 분야의 STEM 교육에 대한 화공교사의 인식과 요구", 대한공업교육학회지, 35(1), pp.44~67 (2010), 대한공업교육학회
  2. 백윤수, "우리나라 STEAM 교육의 방향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(4), pp.149~171 (2011), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  3. 채희인, "STEAM 활동이 초등학생의 과학탐구능력 및 과학에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향", 과학교육연구지, 37(3), pp.417~433 (2013), 과학교육연구소
  4. Fuller, F., "Concerns of teachers : A developmental conceptualization", American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), pp.207~226 (1969)
  5. Hall, G. E., "The concerns-based approach for facilitating change", Educational Horizon, 57(4), pp.202~208 (1979)
  6. Hall, G. E., "Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC questionnaire" (1979), Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin
  7. Hall, G. E., "Levels of use of the innovation : A framework for analyzing innovation adoption", Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), pp.52~56 (1975)
  8. Hord, S. M, "A concerns-based model for the delivery of inservice" (1980), Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin
  9. Hord, S. M., "Taking charge of change" (1987), ASCD
  10. 장수미, "교사의 관심도에 기초한 초등 과학과 수행평가의 실태 분석", 초등과학교육, 21(2), pp.227~239 (2002), 한국초등과학교육학회
  11. Jung, B., "교육과 교육학" (2000), Baeyoungsa
  12. 길말선, "2007 개정 사회과 교육과정에 대한 중학교 교사들의 관심 분석", 교육과정연구, 29(2), pp.121~143 (2011), 한국교육과정학회
  13. 김종희, "제7차 과학 교육과정에 대한 지구과학 교사들의 관심도와 활용도 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 24(5), pp.378~392 (2003), 한국지구과학회
  14. 이대용, "‘특별보충수업’ 운영에 관한 초등학교 교사들의 관심도 분석", 한국초등교육, 21(2), pp.197~212 (2010), 초등교육연구원
  15. 이대용, "수행평가에 관한 초등학교 교사들의 관심과 실행수준 분석", 초등교육연구, 24(4), pp.235~254 (2011), 한국초등교육학회
  16. Author, , 2010
  17. Author, , 2013
  18. "Science teacher's guides for elementary school", Ministry of Education, ~ (2014)
  19. The National Academies Press, , 2013
  20. 박소영, "초등학교 과학과 자유탐구에 관한 교사들의 관심도 분석", 수산해양교육연구, 26(1), pp.134~147 (2014), 한국수산해양교육학회
  21. 신영준, "초등학교 교사들의 융합인재교육(STEAM)에 대한 인식 연구", 초등과학교육, 30(4), pp.514~523 (2011), 한국초등과학교육학회
  22. 심재호, "2009 개정 고등학교 융합과학의 실행에 대한 교사의 인식", 교육과정평가연구, 17(1), pp.53~76 (2014), 한국교육과정평가원
  23. Stenhouse, L., "An introduction to curriculum research and development" (1976), Heinemann
  24. 이지은, "CBAM에 기초한 2007년 개정 교육과정에 대한 교원의 관심도 및 실행도 분석", 교사교육연구, 51(1), pp.137~151 (2012), 과학교육연구소[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)