초등학교 교사의 과학 평가 전문성에 대한 자가진단 내용 분석
Analysis of Elementary School Teachers’ Self-diagnosis on Their Competency for Assessment in Science
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we analyzed elementary school teachers’ self-diagnosis on their competency for assessment in science. A questionnaire was administered to 217 elementary school teachers and in-depth group interviews with 6 teachers were also conducted. The results revealed that the mean scores of five subcategories, ‘choosing assessment methods’, ‘developing assessment instruments’, ‘administering, scoring, and grading’, ‘analyzing, interpreting, using, and communicating assessment results’, and ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’, were 3.82, 3.50, 3.92, 3.76, and 4.09 on a scale of 5 points, respectively. Teachers having more teaching experience showed higher mean scores in all subcategories. However, only the teachers having more than 20 years of teaching experience were statistically better than those having less than 5 years of teaching experience in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. There were no significant differences in terms of major, whereas the mean scores of the teachers having master’s degree were statistically higher than their counterpart in some subcategories. In addition, the teachers who had completed training for assessment exhibited statistically higher mean scores than their counterpart in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed elementary school teachers’ self-diagnosis on their competency for assessment in science. A questionnaire was administered to 217 elementary school teachers and in-depth group interviews with 6 teachers were also conducted. The results revealed that the mean scores of five subcategories, ‘choosing assessment methods’, ‘developing assessment instruments’, ‘administering, scoring, and grading’, ‘analyzing, interpreting, using, and communicating assessment results’, and ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’, were 3.82, 3.50, 3.92, 3.76, and 4.09 on a scale of 5 points, respectively. Teachers having more teaching experience showed higher mean scores in all subcategories. However, only the teachers having more than 20 years of teaching experience were statistically better than those having less than 5 years of teaching experience in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. There were no significant differences in terms of major, whereas the mean scores of the teachers having master’s degree were statistically higher than their counterpart in some subcategories. In addition, the teachers who had completed training for assessment exhibited statistically higher mean scores than their counterpart in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.
참고문헌 (23)
- American Federation of Teacher, "Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students", Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice, 9(4), pp.30~32 (1990)
- Black, P., "Assessment and classroom learning", Assessment in Education, 5(1), pp.7~74 (1998)
- 조희형, "과학교사 교수내용지식(PCK)의 재구성과 적용 방법", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), pp.618~632 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- Choi, K., "The effects of formative assessment with detailed feedback on students' science achievement, attitude, and interaction between teacher and students", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), pp.479~490 (2000)
- Falk, A., "Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science : Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge", Science Education, 96(2), pp.265~290 (2012)
- 장수미, "교사의 관심도에 기초한 초등 과학과 수행평가의 실태 분석", 초등과학교육, 21(2), pp.227~239 (2002), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Kim, D. -Y., "The development of a self-diagnostic program for improving science teachers' competency in student assessment - Centering on earth science contents -", Doctor, pp.2006
- Kim, H. -J., "An investigation on science teachers' evaluation practices in the secondary schools", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), pp.101~111 (2000)
- Kim, J. Y., "Elementary teachers' understanding and practice on science performance assessment", Master, pp.2005
- 중등학교의 성취평가제 운영 방안 연구, "Kim, K.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.CRE 2012-8 (2012)
- 김경미, "과학과 평가 영역간의 중요도에 관한 교사들의 인식에 관한 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), pp.540~549 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- Kim, S., "A study on the teacher's competence for classroom assessment", Journal of Educational Evaluation, 15(1), pp.151~171 (2002)
- Kim, S. -Y., "The study on the recognition of science teachers about the general matters of performance assessment and the appropriate performance assessment methods in middle school science curriculum", Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 9(2), pp.213~232 (2005)
- 고민석, "초등학교 교사의 탐구에 대한 신념과 과학과 수행평가의 실제", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(2), pp.124~135 (2013), 대한지구과학교육학회
- Kwon, J. -S., "과학교육론" (2012), Kyoyookbook Publication Co
- 이양구, "교사의 체육수업 평가에 대한 전문성 연구", 한국체육교육학회지, 16(3), pp.65~75 (2011), 한국체육교육학회
- McMillan, J. H., "Classroom assessment principle and practice for effective instruction" (2004), Allyn & Bacon
- Min, H. J., "Development of assessment expertise model through analyzing realities of science teacher's student assessment and teacher training", Doctor, pp.2012
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "과학과교육과정", Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, ~ (2011)
- 교사의 학생평가 전문성 신장 연구(III), "Nam, M.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.RRE 2006-5 (2006)
- 노태희, "초등교사의 구성주의적 과학 평가관 및 관련 변인 탐색", 초등과학교육, 28(3), pp.352~360 (2009), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Park, S., "Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) : PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals", Research in Science Education, 38(3), pp.261~284 (2008)
- Veal, W. R., "Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies", Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4) (1999)