한국 금융지주회사법상 비은행지주회사에 대한 비교법적 연구 - 미국법제를 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Non-Bank Holding Company under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act focused on the Legal System of the United States
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since late 2007, many countries including Korea have had difficulty in the financial crisis originated from the United States. The financial crisis resulted from the drawbacks of non-bank holding companies so-called non-bank financial groups. Because of that, several major non-bank holding companies went bankrupt. On the other hand, the Korean non-bank holding companies including other financial companies are about to take an advantage to take effectively part in the huge financial market because several financial groups went bankrupt. In this sense, the non-bank holding company system under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act (hereinafter KFHCA) needs to be examined. Through the review of the non-bank holding company system under the KFHCA, the KFHCA has to lay the updated legal foundation for the profits of the Korean non-bank holding companies. For this, the author reviews the non-bank holding company system under the KFHCA focused on the legal system of the United States and concludes as:First, both countries allowed three kinds of financial holding company, such as bank holding company, insurance holding company and financial investment holding company (so-called investment bank holding company in the United States)officially and clearly. Secondly, however, the regulation over these non-bank holding companies differs from two kinds of the non-bank holding company in the United States while the only one regulation is applicable to the whole financial holding company including the non-bank holding company under the KFHCA. Thirdly, the regulatory authority is different from two kinds of the non-bank holding company under the legal system of the United States. But single regulatory authority controls the whole financial holding company including the non-bank holding company under the KFHCA. Forth, even though these two countries adopted the source of strength doctrine (hereinafter SSD), the cross-guarantee provisions (hereinafter CGP) were adopted in the United States but Korea. For the synergy effect of the financial holding company system, the CGP needs to be adopted in the KFHCA in the near future. Finally, because the piece concentrated on the legal system of the United States,the examination consolidated by means of including the European Union (hereinafter EU) is expected to be followed. Moreover, the key lesson for Korea resulted from the following consolidated review on the regulation over the non-bank holding company system of the United States and the EU must be the regulation interlocked with the regulatory levels of these two countries against their non-bank holding companies.
Abstract
Since late 2007, many countries including Korea have had difficulty in the financial crisis originated from the United States. The financial crisis resulted from the drawbacks of non-bank holding companies so-called non-bank financial groups. Because of that, several major non-bank holding companies went bankrupt. On the other hand, the Korean non-bank holding companies including other financial companies are about to take an advantage to take effectively part in the huge financial market because several financial groups went bankrupt. In this sense, the non-bank holding company system under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act (hereinafter KFHCA) needs to be examined. Through the review of the non-bank holding company system under the KFHCA, the KFHCA has to lay the updated legal foundation for the profits of the Korean non-bank holding companies. For this, the author reviews the non-bank holding company system under the KFHCA focused on the legal system of the United States and concludes as:First, both countries allowed three kinds of financial holding company, such as bank holding company, insurance holding company and financial investment holding company (so-called investment bank holding company in the United States)officially and clearly. Secondly, however, the regulation over these non-bank holding companies differs from two kinds of the non-bank holding company in the United States while the only one regulation is applicable to the whole financial holding company including the non-bank holding company under the KFHCA. Thirdly, the regulatory authority is different from two kinds of the non-bank holding company under the legal system of the United States. But single regulatory authority controls the whole financial holding company including the non-bank holding company under the KFHCA. Forth, even though these two countries adopted the source of strength doctrine (hereinafter SSD), the cross-guarantee provisions (hereinafter CGP) were adopted in the United States but Korea. For the synergy effect of the financial holding company system, the CGP needs to be adopted in the KFHCA in the near future. Finally, because the piece concentrated on the legal system of the United States,the examination consolidated by means of including the European Union (hereinafter EU) is expected to be followed. Moreover, the key lesson for Korea resulted from the following consolidated review on the regulation over the non-bank holding company system of the United States and the EU must be the regulation interlocked with the regulatory levels of these two countries against their non-bank holding companies.
참고문헌 (54)
- "논평: 금융지주회사 임직원의 자회사 사외이사 겸직 제한해야" (2010), 경제개혁연대[URL]
- "리먼⋅베어스턴스 회사 망해도 CEO는 ‘건재'" (2009), 공수민[URL]
- 권재열, "회사기회의법리 －2007년 2월 조정된 상법개정안의 비교법적 검토－", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.71~112 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 보도자료: 금융지주회사의 그룹 내부통제 모범규준 마련, "금융감독원 감독서비스총괄국 금융지주총괄팀", 금융감독원, ~ (2010)
- "금융위원회 공고 제2008-146", ~ (2008)
- "리먼 파산신청⋅메릴린치 매각 금융 충격파…주가 대폭락" (2009), 김기정[URL]
- 김문재, "금융지주회사법에 대한 분석과 제언", 비교사법, 8(1) (2001), 한국비교사법학회
- 김병연, "증권거래법상 준법감시인의 법적 책임에 관한 연구 - 증권거래법상 내부통제시스템을 중심으로", 기업법연구, 20(4), pp.273~294 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 김상조, "미국 보험지주회사제도에서의 금융자본과 산업자본의 분리 원칙-보험지주회사법상의 자산운용규제를 중심으로", 사회경제평론, (26), pp.7~37 (2006), 한국사회경제학회
- 김용재, "겸영주의와 금융그룹의 설립방식에 관한 제언, In 금융거래법강의 Ⅱ" (2001), 법문사
- 김훈, "금융지주회사의 도입효과분석과 발전방향", Monthly Bulletin (2008), 한국은행
- 서병호, "미국 금융감독시스템 개편의 주요 내용과 시사점", 주간금융브리프, 19(33) (2010), 한국금융연구원
- "미(美) 양대 모기지업체<패니메이·프레디 맥> 사실상 국유화" (2008), 박종세[URL]
- 백정웅, "우리나라 금융지주회사법의 규제법리에 관한 비교법적 연구", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.361~407 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 백정웅, "미국의 회사기회유용이론과 우리 상법 ― 델라웨어주의 구스 사건을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 25(3), pp.361~393 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 백정웅, "회사기회유용이론의 적용기준과 항변사유* - 미국법제를 중심으로", 비교사법, 16(2), pp.419~466 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
- 백정웅, "힘의 원천이론", 비교사법, 12(4), pp.497~540 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- 안철경, "보험지주회사에 관한 법제 연구", 보험학회지, 75(75), pp.169~196 (2006), 한국보험학회
- 보험지주회사제도 도입 및 활용방안, "안철경", 보험개발원, 2006
- "리먼 인수 바클레이즈 약진. 노무라 머뭇" (2009), 연합뉴스[URL]
- 금융지주회사의 효율적 운용을 위한 제도개선 방안 연구, "이건범", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2005)
- 이영대, "금융지주회사의 규제에 관한 연구", 박사, 경제법전공, pp.2002
- 금융지주회사법의 문제와 개선방안, "전삼현", 자유기업원, ~, pp.CFE Report No. 21 (2007)
- 정윤모, "미국 금융위기를 통해 본 SEC의 감독기능", 자본시장 Weekly, (4) (2008), 한국금융연구원
- 최완진, "商法 改正의 方向에 관한 考察", 외법논집, (25), pp.185~207 (2007), 법학연구소
- "준법지원인制, 의미 없다" (2009), 최준선[URL]
- 허덕회, "이사의 회사기회유용에 대한 규제 - ALI,의 Principles of Corporate Governance를 중심으로", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2002), 한국상사법학회
- Are Bank Holding Companies a Source of Strength to Their Banking Subsidiaries, "Adam B. Ashcraft", Fed. Res. Bank of New York, ~, pp.Staff. Rep. No. 189 (2004)
- Bryan A. Garner, "Black's Law Dictionary" (2001)
- Christopher S. Petito, "Compliance Programs for Investment Advisers and Investment Companies", PLI, 2008, pp.1674, 193~
- Crhistopher T. Curtis, "The Taking Clause and Regulatory Takeovers of Banks and Thrifts", Harv. J. on Legis, 27, pp.367~ (1990)
- David Andrew Segal, "A Note to Congress and the FDIC: After FIRREA Where's the BIF", Fordham L. Rev, 59, pp.S411~ (1991)
- Eric J. Gouvin, "Of Hungry Wolves and Horizontal conflicts: Rethinking the Justifications for Bank Holding Company Liability", U. Ill. L. Rev, pp.949~ (1999)
- Howell E. Jackson, "The Expanding Obligations of Financial Holding Companies", Harv. L. Rev, 107, pp.507~ (1994)
- James F. Groth, "Can Regulators Force Bank Holding Companies To Bail Out Their Failing Subsidiaries? - An Analysis of The Federal Reserve Board's Source of Strength Doctrine", Nw. U. L. Rev, 86, pp.112~ (1991)
- Jenifer B. Arlin, "Of Property Rights and the Fifth Amendment: FIRREA's Cross-Guarantee Reexamined", Wm & Mary L. Rev, 33, pp.293~ (1991)
- Jenifer J. Alexander, "Is the Cross-Guarantee Constitutional", Vand. L. Rev, 48, pp.1741~ (1995)
- John C. Deal, "Capital Punishment: The Death of Limited Liability for Shareholders of Federally Regulated Financial Institutions", Cap. U. L. Rev, 24, pp.67~ (1995)
- John Dembeck, "Insurance Law 1999: Understanding the ABC's Regulation of Insurance", PLI, 1999, pp.602, 119~
- Jonathan C. Lipson, "The Shadow Bankruptcy System", B.U. L. Rev, 89, pp.1609~ (2009)
- Kieran J. Fallon, "Source of Strength or Source of Weakness?: A Critique of the “Source-of-Strength" Doctrine in Banking Reform", N.Y.U. L. Rev, 66, pp.1344~ (1991)
- Lee D. Augsburger, "Rule 38a-1, Insurance Products, and the Compliance Function: Some Practical Consdierations", ~ (2004)
- Leonard Bierman, "The Source of Strength Doctrine: Formulating the Future of America's Financial Markets", Ann. Rev. Banking L, 12, pp.269~ (1993)
- Lissa Lamkin Broome, "Redistributing Bank Insolvency Risks: Challenges to Limited Liability in the Bank Holding Company Structure", U.C. Davis L. Rev, 26, pp.935~ (1993)
- Marc H. Folladori, "A Practical Overview of the SEC's Internal Controls and Executive Certification Disclosure Rules", PLI, 2009, pp.1711, 745~
- Michael C. Macchiarola, "Beware of Risk Everywhere: An Important Lesson from the Current Credit Crisis", Hastings Bus. L.J, 5, pp.267~ (2009)
- Paul S. Bird, "Insurance M&A 2000 A Practical Approach to Structuring Complex Transactions: Insurance M & a in the United States", PLI, 2000, pp.1210, 9~
- Robert W. Helm, "Creating an Effective Compliance Program for Registered Investment Advisers and Registered Investment Companies", PLI, 2004, pp.1453, 21~
- Final Rule: Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, "SEC", ~, pp.Release Nos. 33-8238; 34-47986; IC-26068; File Nos. S7-40-02; S7-06-03 (2003)
- Report: The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU, "The de Larosière Group", Brussels, ~ (2009)
- Financial Regulatory Reform-A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Supervision and Regulation, "The Department of the Treasury", ~ (2009)
- Tracy A. Helmer, "Banking on Solvency: The Takings Power of FIRREA' Cross-Guarantee Provision", Val. U. L. Rev, 30, pp.223~ (1995)
- "Shadow banking system" (2009)[URL]
- William R. Keeton, "Bank Holding Companies, Cross-Bank Guarantees, and Source of Strength", Fed. Res. Bank Kansas City Econ. Rev, 54 (1990)