비은행지주회사에 대한 한국 금융지주회사법과 EU지침의 비교법적 연구
A Comparative Study on the Non-Bank Holding Company under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act focused on the European Legal System under the European Union's Directives
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, there has been a severe financial crisis from the United States in the world. Because of that, so many countries including Korea have had difficulty. In particular, the United States and the European Union (hereinafter EU) including Korea took many measures in order to overcome or control the current financial crisis. Among such many plans to get rid of the financial crisis, the article tries to focus on that of the EU directives as follows: First, the Korean Financial Holding Company Act (hereinafter KFHCA) allowed non-bank holding companies, such as insurance holding companies and financial investment holding companies, to control non-financial companies as their subsidiaries in this amendment. However, the specific requirements for non-bank holding companies to control non-financial companies as their subsidiaries are different from between KFHCA and the EU directives. The EU's non-bank holding companies can control any non-financial companies only if non-bank holding companies own just one insurance or investment company under one roof. On the other hand, the requirements for non-bank holding companies to control non-financial companies as their subsidiaries under the KFHCA differ from between insurance holding companies and financial investment holding companies. Secondly, there is an internal control mechanism or system as a self-regulatory device in both the KFHCA and the EU directives. However, there is a compliance officer under the KFHCA but the EU directives. Thirdly, the KFHCA and the EU directives allows the directors and (or) officers to coincidently hold jobs under the entire non-bank holding companies. Finally, for the Korean legal system, the author concludes and suggests the regulation interlocked with the regulation of the EU and the United States over their non-bank holding companies. So, there needs to examine the regulation of the non-bank holding companies under the United States legal system in the near future.
Abstract
Recently, there has been a severe financial crisis from the United States in the world. Because of that, so many countries including Korea have had difficulty. In particular, the United States and the European Union (hereinafter EU) including Korea took many measures in order to overcome or control the current financial crisis. Among such many plans to get rid of the financial crisis, the article tries to focus on that of the EU directives as follows: First, the Korean Financial Holding Company Act (hereinafter KFHCA) allowed non-bank holding companies, such as insurance holding companies and financial investment holding companies, to control non-financial companies as their subsidiaries in this amendment. However, the specific requirements for non-bank holding companies to control non-financial companies as their subsidiaries are different from between KFHCA and the EU directives. The EU's non-bank holding companies can control any non-financial companies only if non-bank holding companies own just one insurance or investment company under one roof. On the other hand, the requirements for non-bank holding companies to control non-financial companies as their subsidiaries under the KFHCA differ from between insurance holding companies and financial investment holding companies. Secondly, there is an internal control mechanism or system as a self-regulatory device in both the KFHCA and the EU directives. However, there is a compliance officer under the KFHCA but the EU directives. Thirdly, the KFHCA and the EU directives allows the directors and (or) officers to coincidently hold jobs under the entire non-bank holding companies. Finally, for the Korean legal system, the author concludes and suggests the regulation interlocked with the regulation of the EU and the United States over their non-bank holding companies. So, there needs to examine the regulation of the non-bank holding companies under the United States legal system in the near future.
참고문헌 (44)
- "논평: 금융지주회사 임직원의 자회사 사외이사 겸직 제한해야"[URL]
- "리먼·베어스턴스 회사 망해도 CEO는 '건재'"[URL]
- 권재열, "회사기회의법리 －2007년 2월 조정된 상법개정안의 비교법적 검토－", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.71~112 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 보도자료: 금융지주회사의 그룹 내부통제 모범규준 마련, "금융감독원 감독서비스총괄국 금융지주총괄팀", 금융감독원, ~ (2010)
- "금융위원회 공고 제2008-146호(2008.10.14)", ~ (2008)
- "리먼 파산신청·메릴린치 매각 금융 충격파…주가 대폭락"[URL]
- 김병연, "증권거래법상 준법감시인의 법적 책임에 관한 연구 - 증권거래법상 내부통제시스템을 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 20(4), pp.273~294 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- "미(美) 양대 모기지업체<패니메이·프레디 맥> 사실상 국유화"[URL]
- 백정웅, "2008년 10월 금융지주회사법 개정안의 자회사", 법학연구, 19(2), pp.135~159 (2008), 법학연구소
- 백정웅, "금융지주회사법 개정안의 법적 쟁점과 과제", 은행법연구, 1(2), pp.149~194 (2008), 은행법학회
- 백정웅, "회사기회유용이론의 적용기준과 항변사유* - 미국법제를 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 16(2), pp.419~466 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
- 연구보고서 2006-3: 보험지주회사제도 도입 및 활용방안, "안철경", 보험연구원, ~ (2006)
- "리먼 인수 바클레이즈 약진..노무라 머뭇"[URL]
- CFE Report No. 21: 금융지주회사법의 문제와 개선방안, "전삼현", 자유기업원, ~ (2007)
- 정윤모, "미국 금융위기를 통해 본 SEC의 감독기능", 자본시장 Weekly, 2008(4) (2008), 한국금융연구원
- 최완진, "商法 改正의 方向에 관한 考察", 외법논집, (25), pp.185~207 (2007), 법학연구소
- "준법지원인制, 의미 없다"[URL]
- 허덕회, "이사의 회사기회유용에 대한 규제 - ALI,의 Principles of Corporate Governance를 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2002), 한국상사법학회
- Are Bank Holding Companies a Source of Strength to Their Banking Subsidiaries?, "Adam B. Ashcraft", Fed. Res. Bank of New York, ~, pp.Staff. Rep. No. 189 (2004)
- Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations, "American Law Institute", ~
- Bryan A. Garner, "Black's Law Dictionary 2d Pocket ed" (2001), West Group
- Christopher T. Curtis, "The Taking Clause and Regulatory Takeovers of Banks and Thrifts", Harv. J. on Legis., 27, pp.367~ (1990)
- "Council Directive 93", 6, ~
- David Andrew Segal, "A Note to Congress and the FDIC: After FIRREA Where's the BIF?", Fordham L. Rev., 59, pp.S411~ (1991)
- David Longworth, "Financial System Policy Responses to the Crisis", BIS Rev., 29, pp.1~ (2009)
- "Directive 98", 78, ~
- "Directive 2000", 12, ~
- "Directive 2002", 87, 239, pp.EEC, 79, 267[DOI]
- "Directive 2009", 138, ~
- Eric J. Gouvin, "Of Hungry Wolves and Horizontal conflicts: Rethinking the Justifications for Bank Holding Company Liability", U. Ill. L. Rev., 949 (1999)
- Howell e. Jackson, "The Expanding Obligations of Financial Holding Companies", Harv. L. Rev., 107, pp.507~ (1994)
- James F. Groth, "Can Regulators Force Bank Holding Companies To Bail Out Their Failing Subsidiaries? - An Analysis of The Federal Reserve Board's Source of Strength Doctrine", Nw. U. L. Rev., 86, pp.112~ (1991)
- Jenifer B. Arlin, "Of Property Rights and the Fifth Amendment: FIRREA's Cross-Guarantee Reexamined", Wm & Mary L. Rev., 33, pp.293~ (1991)
- Jenifer J. Alexander, "Is the Cross-Guarantee Constitutional?", Vand. L. Rev., 48, pp.1741~ (1995)
- John C. Deal, "Capital Punishment: The Death of Limited Liability for Shareholders of Federally Regulated Financial Institutions", Cap. U. L. Rev., 24, pp.67~ (1995)
- Kieran J. Fallon, "Source of Strength or Source of Weakness?: A Critique of the “Source-of-Strength" Doctrine in Banking Reform", N.Y.U. L. Rev., 66, pp.1344~ (1991)
- Leonard Bierman, "The Source of Strength Doctrine: Formulating the Future of America's Financial Markets", Ann. Rev. Banking L., 12, pp.269~ (1993)
- Lissa Lamkin Broome, "Redistributing Bank Insolvency Risks: Challenges to Limited Liability in the Bank Holding Company Structure", U.C. Davis L. Rev., 26, pp.935~ (1993)
- Michael C. Macchiarola, "Beware of Risk Everywhere: An Important Lesson from the Current Credit Crisis", Hastings Bus. L.J., 5, pp.267~ (2009)
- Tracy A. Helmer, "Banking on Solvency: The Takings Power of FIRREA' Cross-Guarantee Provision", Val. U. L. Rev., 30, pp.223~ (1995)
- Report: The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU, "The de Larosière Group", ~ (2009)
- The Department of the Treasury, "Financial Regulatory Reform-A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Supervision and Regulation", ~ (2009)
- "Shadow banking system"[URL]
- William R. Keeton, "Bank Holding Companies, Cross-Bank Guarantees, and Source of Strength", Fed. Res. Bank Kansas City Econ. Rev., 54 (1990)