공정거래법 개정안상 중간지주회사의 도입에 대한 검토 -금융지주회사법과 관련하여-
The Critical Review of the Intermediary Financial Holding Company Newly Introduced under the New Bill of the Korean Anti-Trust Law in Relation to the Intermediary Financial Holding Company under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On March 18, 2010, the intermediary financial holding company was introduced by the new Bill of the Korean anti-trust law in order to clarify the corporate governance of major Chaebols. The degree of the regulation on the entire holding company including the intermediary financial holding companies introduced by the new bill of the Korean anti-trust law is mitigated as compared to that of the regulation about the financial holding company including the intermediary financial holding company under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act (hereinafter KFHCA). Because of that, the intermediary financial holding company introduced by the new bill of the Korean anti-trust law is expected to be used far more than the use of the intermediary financial holding company under the KFHCA and there is a regulatory arbitrage between two intermediary financial holding companies. However, because these two intermediary holding companies are financial holding company, such a regulatory arbitrage must be removed. Moreover, Korea has to enforce Free Trade Agreement with the European Union (hereinafter EU) and the United States in the very near future. Therefore, Korea needs to review the information of the EU and the United States on the intermediary financial holding company and reflect the same or almost same degree of their regulatory approach to the Korean legal system.
Abstract
On March 18, 2010, the intermediary financial holding company was introduced by the new Bill of the Korean anti-trust law in order to clarify the corporate governance of major Chaebols. The degree of the regulation on the entire holding company including the intermediary financial holding companies introduced by the new bill of the Korean anti-trust law is mitigated as compared to that of the regulation about the financial holding company including the intermediary financial holding company under the Korean Financial Holding Company Act (hereinafter KFHCA). Because of that, the intermediary financial holding company introduced by the new bill of the Korean anti-trust law is expected to be used far more than the use of the intermediary financial holding company under the KFHCA and there is a regulatory arbitrage between two intermediary financial holding companies. However, because these two intermediary holding companies are financial holding company, such a regulatory arbitrage must be removed. Moreover, Korea has to enforce Free Trade Agreement with the European Union (hereinafter EU) and the United States in the very near future. Therefore, Korea needs to review the information of the EU and the United States on the intermediary financial holding company and reflect the same or almost same degree of their regulatory approach to the Korean legal system.
참고문헌 (26)
- 17대대통령직인수위원회, "백서1: 성공 그리고 나눔-이명박정부의 국정철학과 핵심정책과제" (2008), 17대대통령직인수위원회
- 보도자료: 공정위의 중간금융지주회사 의무화 기준(안)의 규제효과 분석 (별첨 제외 총 4쪽), "경제개혁연대", 경제개혁연대, ~ (2010)
- 제288회 국회 임시회 제1차 정무위원회 법률안심사소위원회 회의결과보고, "구기성", 국회사무처, ~ (2010)
- "‘중간 금융지주회사’ 도입…금산분리 완화 ‘제동’" (2010), 곽정수[URL]
- 권태훈, "금융지주회사법의 실무상 쟁점 검토", 제5회 정기학술대회 발표논문 (2010), 은행법학회
- 김문재, "금융지주회사법에 대한 분석과 제언", 비교사법, 8(1) (2001), 한국비교사법학회
- 김용재, "겸영주의와 금융그룹의 설립방식에 관한 제언. in: 금융거래법강의Ⅱ" (2001), 법문사
- "여야 합의된 중간지주사법 처리 ‘박영선 변수’" (2010), 김형호[URL]
- 금융위원회, "보도자료 - 제목 : (가칭)한국투자운용지주(주) 설립 예비인가. 금융위원회", ~ (2008)
- 류혁선, "미국 금융지주회사제도에 관한 고찰과 그 시사점", 제5회 정기학술대회 발표논문 (2010), 은행법학회
- 백정웅, "2008년 10월 금융지주회사법 개정안의 자회사", 법학연구, 19(2), pp.135~159 (2008), 법학연구소
- 백정웅, "금융위기 이후 미국 및 EU의 금융규제 - 그 시사점을 중심으로 -", 중앙법학, 11(3), pp.241~269 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 백정웅, "｢퍼스트링컨우드지주｣(First Lincolnwood Corp.) 사건 등에 나타난 힘의 원천이론의 비교법적 고찰", 상사법연구, 24(4) (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 백정웅, "한국 금융지주회사에 대한 적기시정 조치", 원광법학, 23(2), pp.365~404 (2007), 법학연구소
- 백정웅, "힘의 원천이론", 비교사법, 12(4), pp.497~540 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- "삼성식 성동격서 전술…“진짜 위험은 공정거래법 개정안”" (2009), 성현석[URL]
- "대기업 6곳 지배구조 재편 고민중" (2010), 유대근[URL]
- "공정거래법 개정안 사실상 ‘무산’..6월 국회로" (2010), 윤진섭[URL]
- 이영대, "금융지주회사의 규제에 관한 연구", 박사, 경제법전공, pp.2002
- "현대차·한화, 지주회사 전환 길 열렸다" (2010), 이영창[URL]
- 독점규제 및 공정거래에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안(정부제출) 검토보고서, "정순영", 국회 정무위원회, ~ (2009)
- , 제287회 국회(임시회), ｢정무위원회회의록(법률안심사소위원회) (임시회의록) 제2호｣ (2010), 국회사무처
- , 제287회 국회(임시회), ｢정무위원회회의록(법률안심사소위원회) (임시회의록) 제7호｣ (2010), 국회사무처
- , 제288회 국회(임시회), ｢정무위원회회의록(법률안심사소위원회) (임시회의록) 제1호｣ (2010), 국회사무처
- , 제289회 국회(임시회), ｢정무위원회회의록(임시회의록) 제1호｣ (2010), 국회사무처
- "지배구조: 사업라인" (2006), 한국투자금융지주[URL]