보증보험에 있어서 피보험자(채권자)의 고지의무에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Duty to Disclose of the Assured in the Guaranty Insurance
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The surety is entitled to suretyship defences as defined in section 12 in the Restatement of Security (third) published by the American Law Institute(ALI)which distinguishes between where before the guarantor has undertaken and, after formation of contract of suretyship. Subdivision (1) of section 12 prescribes where before the guarantor has undertaken his obligation the creditor knows facts unknown to the guarantors that materially increase the risk beyond that which the creditor has reason to believe the guarantor intends to assume, and the creditor also has reason to believe that these facts are unknown to the guarantor and has a reasonable opportunity to communicate them to the guarantor, failure of the creditor to notify the guarantor of such facts is a defense to the guarantor. In Korea, the special law for protection of the guarantor has been legislated on March 21, 2008, and came into effect on September 22, 2008. It is prescribing the special cases of the civil law, aiming to prevent both financial and mental damages from guarantee contract and establish reasonable custom of the suretyship system. Because there is information gap between the obligee and the surety, there is recognizing the duties of the obligee to the surety which give a proper information of the real state of finance and economic situation of principal. At last, consolidating the protection of the guarantor in revising the civil law and including the special act of the protection of the guarantor into the civil law should be theoretically founded and established in a way to minimize the damages of the guarantors from the enlargement of their responsibilities of surety contracts,considering our society's actual state. From this point of the trend, the assured is under the duty of to disclose all material relating to the insurance which he proposes to effect. The decisive influence test has been adopted by Korean Supreme Court and scholars in order to certain what facts are to be regarded as material. However, these duties are modified by the terms of the contract. The assured must disclose all material facts which are within his actual or presumed knowledge. In practice, a list of printed questions in the proposal from is usually submitted to him to answer in writing.
Abstract
The surety is entitled to suretyship defences as defined in section 12 in the Restatement of Security (third) published by the American Law Institute(ALI)which distinguishes between where before the guarantor has undertaken and, after formation of contract of suretyship. Subdivision (1) of section 12 prescribes where before the guarantor has undertaken his obligation the creditor knows facts unknown to the guarantors that materially increase the risk beyond that which the creditor has reason to believe the guarantor intends to assume, and the creditor also has reason to believe that these facts are unknown to the guarantor and has a reasonable opportunity to communicate them to the guarantor, failure of the creditor to notify the guarantor of such facts is a defense to the guarantor. In Korea, the special law for protection of the guarantor has been legislated on March 21, 2008, and came into effect on September 22, 2008. It is prescribing the special cases of the civil law, aiming to prevent both financial and mental damages from guarantee contract and establish reasonable custom of the suretyship system. Because there is information gap between the obligee and the surety, there is recognizing the duties of the obligee to the surety which give a proper information of the real state of finance and economic situation of principal. At last, consolidating the protection of the guarantor in revising the civil law and including the special act of the protection of the guarantor into the civil law should be theoretically founded and established in a way to minimize the damages of the guarantors from the enlargement of their responsibilities of surety contracts,considering our society's actual state. From this point of the trend, the assured is under the duty of to disclose all material relating to the insurance which he proposes to effect. The decisive influence test has been adopted by Korean Supreme Court and scholars in order to certain what facts are to be regarded as material. However, these duties are modified by the terms of the contract. The assured must disclose all material facts which are within his actual or presumed knowledge. In practice, a list of printed questions in the proposal from is usually submitted to him to answer in writing.
참고문헌 (34)
- 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼지원
- 최기원, "보험법" (2002), 박영사
- 권혁재, "보험계약상의 고지의무, In 보험법의 제문제(하)" (1982)
- 김상중, "보증계약에서의 위험귀속과 채권자의 통지・정보제공의무", 법조, 52(7) (2003)
- 김선정, "보험계약법상 고지의무에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1992
- 박세민, "영국의 고지의무에 있어서 유인요소에 대한 해석과 우리 보험법에의 적용문제", 보험학회지, 63, pp.109~144 (2002), 한국보험학회
- 박세민, "중요성 판단의 문제와 해석 - 고지의무제도를 중심으로", 상사법연구, 15(2) (1996)
- 백경일, "보증계약의 특수성과 보증인보호의 문제", 민사법학, (34), pp.167~192 (2006), 한국민사법학회
- 서원철, "보증보험의 실태와 법적 성격, In 보험법의 제문제" (1982)
- 서종석, "보증보험의 도덕적 위험관리에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1990
- 양승규, "보증보험계약자의 기망으로 인한 계약취소와 피보험자의 지위", 손해보험, (431) (2004), 대한손해보험협회
- 양승규, "사기에 의한 고지의무위반과 보증보험자의 인수과실의 책임", 손해보험 (1992)
- 양승규, "타인을 위한 손해보험계약", 법률행정논집, 10 (1972), 고려대 법률행정연구소
- 양창수, "채권자의 보증인에 대한 배려의무에 관한 서설-독일민법을 중심으로 한 입법례", 법학, 통권 : 41 (2000), 서울대 법학연구소
- 이기항, "우리나라 보증보험의 현재와 미래- 그 성격 및 제도상의 문제점을 중심으로", 보험학회지, 7 (1970), 한국보험학회
- 이상욱, "채권자의 보증인에 대한 신의칙상의 고지의무", 민사법학, (18) (2000)
- 이은섭, "영국해상보험법상 고지의무", 보험학회지, 42(1) (1993)
- 장덕조, "고지의무위반의 요건과 효과에 관한 체계적 해석", 보험법연구, 2 (1998)
- 장덕조, "보증보험에서의 고지의무와 기망행위", 보험법연구, 5 (2003), 보험법연구회
- 장덕조, "보증보험의 법적 성질에 대한 의문의 제기", 보험법연구, 4 (2002), 삼지원
- 정경영, "보증보험에서 보험자의 구상권, In 21세기 한국상사법의 과제와 전망" (2002), 박영사
- 정경영, "일반 손해보험에 대한 보증보험의 특성에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 29(1), pp.253~282 (2010), 한국상사법학회
- 정호열, "고지의무에 관한 고찰", 법학, 40(1) (1999), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 최기원, "보험계약자의 고지의무에 관한 고찰", 법학, 32(3) (1991), 서울대 법학연구소
- 최봉경, "보증인 보호를 위한 특별법에 관한 소고", BTL, (33) (2009), 서울대 금융법센터
- 한지정, "보증보험의 법적 성질에 대한 연구", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.20~625 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 보험계약의 종료에 관한 연구, In 보증보험의 법적 제문제, "한기정", 서울보증보험, ~ (2005)
- 한창희, "보증보험의 법적 고찰", 보험학회지, 33 (1989), 한국보험학회
- 倉澤康一郞, "告知義務, In 保險契約法の現代的課題" (1978), 成文堂
- Birds, John, "Modern Insurance Law, 4th ed" (1997), Sweet & Maxwell
- Clarke, Malcolm A, "The Law of Insurance Contracts, 2nd ed" (1994), Lloyd's of London Press
- Leo, T. Scott, "The Restatement of Suretyship & Guaranty, : A Translation for the Practitioner" (2005), American Bar Association
- MacGillivray, "Insurance Law, 7th ed" (1981), Sweet & Maxwell
- Restatement of the Law, Suretyship and Guaranty, - As Adopts and Promulgated, , The American Law Institute, ~ (1996)
