Be와 Get 수동 구문 번역의 오류 지도 방안
Teaching Method for the Errors of Be and Get Passive in Translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out how to teach English learners about get passive constructions for translation. Many English learners make errors when they translate English get passive constructions into Korean. I review the features of Korean passive and English be passive and get passive constructions in English. There are three passive constructions in Korean: phrasal, lexical and adversity passive. In English, get passive has several properties, different from be passive. They are mostly interchangeable, but have very different grammatical properties. Verb be is auxiliary but verb get is not. And get can be used as an idiosyncratic expression, holding various semantic and pragmatic properties according to context. In this paper I focused on get passive constructions in order to find out the semantic differences between get passive and be passive. For this, I looked into the six properties of get passive constructions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out how to teach English learners about get passive constructions for translation. Many English learners make errors when they translate English get passive constructions into Korean. I review the features of Korean passive and English be passive and get passive constructions in English. There are three passive constructions in Korean: phrasal, lexical and adversity passive. In English, get passive has several properties, different from be passive. They are mostly interchangeable, but have very different grammatical properties. Verb be is auxiliary but verb get is not. And get can be used as an idiosyncratic expression, holding various semantic and pragmatic properties according to context. In this paper I focused on get passive constructions in order to find out the semantic differences between get passive and be passive. For this, I looked into the six properties of get passive constructions.
참고문헌 (18)
- 박기성, "영어와 한국어 비교구문 의미론 연구", 언어과학, 18(4), pp.47~60 (2011), 한국언어과학회
- 宋昌善, "국어 {-이-}계 접미사의 타동화 기능 연구", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1994
- Chappell, H., "Is the get-passve adversative?", Language and Social Interaction, 13(3), pp.411~452 (1980)
- Collins, P., "Get-passives in English", World Englishes, 15, pp.43~56 (1996)
- Curme, G., "Syntax" (1931), Heath
- Downing, A., "Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice", pp.179~205 (1996)
- Fleisher, N., "The origin of passive get", English Language and Linguistics, 10(2), pp.225~252 (2006)
- Hageman, L., "The get-passive and Burzio's generalization", Lingua, 66, pp.53~77 (1985)
- Hong, K., "Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean", Ph. D., pp.1992
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Jesperson, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles" (1949), Allen and Urwin
- 김종복, "English Get-Passive Constructions: A Corpus-Based Approach", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.437~457 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Klaiman, M., "The Grammar of Doing and Undoing", Language Research, 2(4), pp.331~343 (1984)
- Lakeoff, R., "Passive resistance", Papers fromthe Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.149~162 (1971)
- Parlmer, F., "The English Verb" (1974), Longman
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Sussex, R., "A note on the get-passive construction", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2, pp.183~195 (1982)
- Taranto, G., "An event structure analysis of causative and passive get", Ms, pp.2005