본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 사역 구문에서의 번역 오류와 지도 방안

Translation Errors and Teaching Methods in English Causative Constructions

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to study the lexical meanings and complement types of three causative constructions, have, make and let. These verbs are called syntactic causative verbs. They have different complements such as bare infinitives, infinitives with 'to', past participles, present participles as well as adjectives or nouns. In general, verbs select the syntactic complements according to their unique properties and have diverse meanings in the context. Causative constructions can select a variety of complement types. They have slightly different meanings. However, most of Korean students translate causative constructions of English into Korean without noticing their proper meanings. I compare their exact meanings and analyze the complement types of the three causative verbs, have, make and let.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the lexical meanings and complement types of three causative constructions, have, make and let. These verbs are called syntactic causative verbs. They have different complements such as bare infinitives, infinitives with 'to', past participles, present participles as well as adjectives or nouns. In general, verbs select the syntactic complements according to their unique properties and have diverse meanings in the context. Causative constructions can select a variety of complement types. They have slightly different meanings. However, most of Korean students translate causative constructions of English into Korean without noticing their proper meanings. I compare their exact meanings and analyze the complement types of the three causative verbs, have, make and let.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 김경학, "사역이동 구문의 분석과 의미해석에 대해", 언어학, (24), pp.53~73 (1999), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  2. 김광현, "영어 사역구문의 구조와 의미", 박사, pp.2006
  3. Chomsky, N, "On Binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.1~46 (1980)
  4. Goldberg, E., "Construction: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  5. Haiman, J., "The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation", Language, 56, pp.515~540 (1980)
  6. Haiman, J., "Iconic and Economic Motivation", Language, 53, pp.781~819 (1983)
  7. Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
  8. Lakoff, G., "On the nature of syntactic irregularity" (1965), Computation Laboratory, Harvard University
  9. MaCawely, D., "Lexical Insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure", Paper from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.71~80 (1968), University of Chicago, Dept. of Linguistics
  10. Martin, P., "Grammar for English Language Teachers" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  11. Postal, M., "The cross-over principle: a study in the grammar fo co-reference" (1969), Thomas J. Watson Research Center. IBM Corporation

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)