본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

海を超える知的交流-芥川龍之介と章炳麟の日中交流の論考-

Cross-sea intellectual exchange -The Discussion on the Cultural Exchange Between Ryunosuke Akutagawa and Zhang Binglin-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

During the Taisho era, the renowned writer Ryunosuke Akutagawa grew up immersed in classical Chinese literature from a young age. The enchanting fantasies of ancient China became an integral part of his upbringing. From March to July 1921, Akutagawa embarked on a journey as a special correspondent for the Osaka Mainichi Shimbun, traversing through most major cities in eastern China. Upon his arrival in China, Akutagawa met with a succession of elite members of Chinese intellectual circles, including Zhang Binglin, Zheng Xiaoxu, Gu Hongming, and Li Renjie. Subsequently, reflecting on his interactions with these literati, Akutagawa reminisced in his work “Travels in China.” It became evident from his words that a mixture of admiration and disdain for Chinese literati coexisted within him.In this paper, we have examined the “Shanghai Travelogue,” focusing particularly on the interaction between Ryunosuke Akutagawa and Zhang Binglin. Firstly, we summarized various aspects centered around the “Process of Interaction Between Ryunosuke Akutagawa and Zhang Binglin.” Secondly, we delved into Akutagawa's perspectives on Zhang Binglin in detail. Thirdly, we analyzed the limitations of Akutagawa's perspectives on Zhang Binglin and explored the causes of Akutagawa's passive emotions that emerged during their conversations.The conclusions drawn from these analyses are as follows:Firstly, Ryunosuke Akutagawa's views on Zhang Binglin are complex. He holds Zhang Binglin's erudition and eloquence in high regard, praising these aspects. However, instead of direct statements, he expresses his dissatisfaction and passive emotions using metaphors.Secondly, regarding the limitations of Akutagawa's perspectives and the causes of his passive emotions, Akutagawa believes that his primary reason is the embarrassing psychology he faced as a Japanese anti-war advocate confronting China. Additionally, he faced the harsh reality of urban decline, which deeply disappointed him. Consequently, he was compelled to contemplate the realities of politics and society in China, leading to concerns and confusion.

Abstract

During the Taisho era, the renowned writer Ryunosuke Akutagawa grew up immersed in classical Chinese literature from a young age. The enchanting fantasies of ancient China became an integral part of his upbringing. From March to July 1921, Akutagawa embarked on a journey as a special correspondent for the Osaka Mainichi Shimbun, traversing through most major cities in eastern China. Upon his arrival in China, Akutagawa met with a succession of elite members of Chinese intellectual circles, including Zhang Binglin, Zheng Xiaoxu, Gu Hongming, and Li Renjie. Subsequently, reflecting on his interactions with these literati, Akutagawa reminisced in his work “Travels in China.” It became evident from his words that a mixture of admiration and disdain for Chinese literati coexisted within him.In this paper, we have examined the “Shanghai Travelogue,” focusing particularly on the interaction between Ryunosuke Akutagawa and Zhang Binglin. Firstly, we summarized various aspects centered around the “Process of Interaction Between Ryunosuke Akutagawa and Zhang Binglin.” Secondly, we delved into Akutagawa's perspectives on Zhang Binglin in detail. Thirdly, we analyzed the limitations of Akutagawa's perspectives on Zhang Binglin and explored the causes of Akutagawa's passive emotions that emerged during their conversations.The conclusions drawn from these analyses are as follows:Firstly, Ryunosuke Akutagawa's views on Zhang Binglin are complex. He holds Zhang Binglin's erudition and eloquence in high regard, praising these aspects. However, instead of direct statements, he expresses his dissatisfaction and passive emotions using metaphors.Secondly, regarding the limitations of Akutagawa's perspectives and the causes of his passive emotions, Akutagawa believes that his primary reason is the embarrassing psychology he faced as a Japanese anti-war advocate confronting China. Additionally, he faced the harsh reality of urban decline, which deeply disappointed him. Consequently, he was compelled to contemplate the realities of politics and society in China, leading to concerns and confusion.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김효순, "아쿠타가와 류노스케(芥川龍之介) 문학의 현재성 -「모모타로(桃太郞)」에 나타난 가치의 상대성을 둘러싸고", 비교한국학, 15, pp.195~223 (2007), 국제비교한국학회
  2. 송현순, "아쿠타가와 류노스케(芥川龍之介)의 『모모타로(桃太郎)』 연구 -침략자 모모타로를 중심으로-", 한일군사문화연구, 26, pp.381~404 (2018), 한일군사문화학회
  3. 손순옥, "아쿠타가와 류노스케의 『上海遊記』와요코미츠 리이치의 『上海』연구", 일어일문학, (64), pp.319~335 (2014), 대한일어일문학회
  4. 윤일, "동아시아해역의 문화 수용과 일본 문학 - 아쿠타가와 류노스케의 『江南游記』를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 75, pp.39~50 (2023), 동북아시아문화학회
  5. 芥川龍之介, "『芥川龍之介全集』 第八巻", pp.32~ (1996), 岩波書店
  6. 芥川龍之介, "『芥川龍之介全集』 第十一巻", pp.199~200 (1996), 岩波書店
  7. 芥川龍之介介, "『芥川龍之介全集』 第十九巻", pp.181~182 (1997), 岩波書店
  8. 榎本泰子, "アジア遊学", pp.277~293 (2023), 勉誠社
  9. 小澤保博, "芥川龍之介「支那游記」研究(上)", 琉球大学教育学部紀要, pp.35~47 (2009), 琉球大学教育学部
  10. 関口安義, "特派員芥川龍之介", pp.99~103 (1997), 毎日新聞社
  11. 関口安義, "芥川龍之介闘いの生涯", pp.32~38 (1997), 毎日新聞社
  12. 鈴木暁世, "芥川龍之介『支那游記』論 : 『馬の脚』 『湖南の扇』への影響について", 語文, pp.50~63 (2006), 大阪大学国語国文学会
  13. 成瀬哲生, "大正四年七月の「仙人」——芥川龍之介と中国文学", 徳島大学国語国文学, pp.25~ (1992), 徳島大学国語国文学会
  14. 西田禎元, "芥川龍之介と上海", 創大アジア研究, pp.1~9 (1996), 創価大学アジア研究所
  15. 單援朝, "芥川龍之介『支那游記』の世界一萝想と現実との間", 国語と国文学, pp.49~62 (1991)
  16. 杜文倩, "文化汇流中的抉择与超越——芥川龙之介与中国", 山东大学 (2006)
  17. 高潔, "作家芥川龍之介の中国旅行——テキスト「支那遊記」を中心に" (2006), 上海外国语大学
  18. 劉耕毓, "湖南の扇」論 :中国革命との関連をめぐって", 九大日文, pp.2~13 (2010), 九州大学日本語文学会
  19. 秦剛, "国文学解釈鑑賞", pp.179~186 (2007), ぎょうせい
  20. 邱雅芬, "章炳麟对日本作家芥川龙之介创作之影响", 中山大学报, pp.69~ (1999)
  21. 邱雅芬, "上海游记 : 一个充满隐喻的文本", 外国文学评论, pp.74~82 (2005)
  22. 孫立春, "芥川龍之介の中国認識―『支那遊記』を中心に" (2005), 中国海洋大学
  23. 于天祎, "中国对芥川龙之介文学的影响", 齐鲁学刊, pp.111~113 (2007)
  24. 周冰, "芥川龍之介「上海游記」論 : 「私」が見た「新しい」上海", 人文論究, pp.21~ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)