동아시아해역의 문화 수용과 일본 문학
Cultural Acceptance in East Asian Sea and Japanese literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 1921, at the age of 29, Akutagawa traveled to China for about 120 days as a correspondent for the ‘Osakamainuchi shinbun’ newspaper. He left Tokyo by train on March 19, got off at Osaka on March 20, recovered from a high fever caused by a cold, left Osaka on March 27, arrived at Moji on March 28, boarded Chikugomaru, and arrived in Shanghai on March 30. It was a rough trip, including high fever before boarding and seasickness that suffered while crossing Hyeonhaetan. “Traveling to Gangnam” left Shanghai on May 2nd, returned to Hangzhou from May 2nd to 5th, departed Shanghai on May 8th, traveled to Suzhou from May 10th, Yangzhou from May 11th to 12th, and Nanjing from 12th to 14th, and returned to Shanghai on the 15th. The “Traveling to Gangnam” covered in this study is a travel journal from May 2 to 14, 1921. The experience gained from a 10-day trip to Gangnam was published in a newspaper series about eight months later. Although it was a series following “Traveling to Shanghai”, unlike expectations of the old scenery of China in the travel book of Gangnam, the appearance of modern China was only disappointing. The difference from “Traveling to Shanghai” is that it was able to experience epic landscapes such as the mysterious stories of Chinese classics. In addition, as quoted below, dissatisfaction with the ‘yankee hobby’ that encroached on modern China and traditional culture seems to have played a major role. The main purpose of this study is the representation and characteristics of modern China of Akutagawa sent to China as a newspaper correspondent, especially the Gangnam periodical, and the difference from the previous “Traveling to Shanghai” and I would like to point out the problem of adding fictional elements to nonfiction's travel. In previous studies at home and abroad, there were many critical views such as Akutagawa's disparagement of modern China, his limitations as an intellectual, and imperial thinking. In the end, it is necessary to confirm the "journalism" of Akutagawa, a correspondent who experienced China's turbulent period, such as the modern Western powers and the invasion of Japanese imperialism, and his hidden aspect as a novelist.
Abstract
In 1921, at the age of 29, Akutagawa traveled to China for about 120 days as a correspondent for the ‘Osakamainuchi shinbun’ newspaper. He left Tokyo by train on March 19, got off at Osaka on March 20, recovered from a high fever caused by a cold, left Osaka on March 27, arrived at Moji on March 28, boarded Chikugomaru, and arrived in Shanghai on March 30. It was a rough trip, including high fever before boarding and seasickness that suffered while crossing Hyeonhaetan. “Traveling to Gangnam” left Shanghai on May 2nd, returned to Hangzhou from May 2nd to 5th, departed Shanghai on May 8th, traveled to Suzhou from May 10th, Yangzhou from May 11th to 12th, and Nanjing from 12th to 14th, and returned to Shanghai on the 15th. The “Traveling to Gangnam” covered in this study is a travel journal from May 2 to 14, 1921. The experience gained from a 10-day trip to Gangnam was published in a newspaper series about eight months later. Although it was a series following “Traveling to Shanghai”, unlike expectations of the old scenery of China in the travel book of Gangnam, the appearance of modern China was only disappointing. The difference from “Traveling to Shanghai” is that it was able to experience epic landscapes such as the mysterious stories of Chinese classics. In addition, as quoted below, dissatisfaction with the ‘yankee hobby’ that encroached on modern China and traditional culture seems to have played a major role. The main purpose of this study is the representation and characteristics of modern China of Akutagawa sent to China as a newspaper correspondent, especially the Gangnam periodical, and the difference from the previous “Traveling to Shanghai” and I would like to point out the problem of adding fictional elements to nonfiction's travel. In previous studies at home and abroad, there were many critical views such as Akutagawa's disparagement of modern China, his limitations as an intellectual, and imperial thinking. In the end, it is necessary to confirm the "journalism" of Akutagawa, a correspondent who experienced China's turbulent period, such as the modern Western powers and the invasion of Japanese imperialism, and his hidden aspect as a novelist.
참고문헌 (8)
- 芥川竜之介, "芥川竜之介全集 第六卷", pp.299~ (1996), 岩波書店
- 芥川竜之介, "芥川竜之介全集 第十三卷", pp.105~ (1996), 岩波書店
- 송현순, "아쿠타가와 류노스케 전집Ⅷ", pp.102~ (2017), 제이앤씨
- 王書瑋, "芥川と中国画-南画を中心にして-", 人文社会科学研究, (17), pp.12~ (1979)
- 陳玫君, "広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第二部, 文化教育開発関連領域 52", pp.218~ (2003), 広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要
- 林茜茜, "谷崎潤一郎が中国へ投射したもの : 「天鵞絨の夢」を視座にして", 比較文学, 59, pp.108~ (2016), 日本比較文学会
- 周芷冰, "芥川竜之介『江南游記』論: 芥川が見た新しき「江南」", 人文論究, 67(2), pp.6~ (2017)
- 윤일, "1920년대 ‘동북아해역’의 지적교류 -아쿠타가와 류노스케(芥川 龍之介)『상해유기』를 중심으로-", 인문사회과학연구, 20(3), pp.161~188 (2019), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
