본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고령화사회의 인지연령과 기부의도에 관한 연구

A Study on the Relationship between Donation Intention and Cognitive Age in an Aging Society

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose – This research aims to understand the different behaviors of consumers according to cognitive age. Specifically, this research is focused on pro-social behavior. Pro-social behavior is defined as behavior benefiting others, rather than behavior benefiting one’s self. It often entails individual risk or cost, such as when giving resources to others, waiting in line, asking for or paying a fair price, or risking one’s life in battle. Therefore, we sought to understand consumer psychology and cognitive age as a reflection of inner psychology. People frequently perceive themselves as younger or older than their chronological ages. This self-perceived or cognitive age is a subjective age perception independent of actual chronological age. The discrepancy degree between chronological and cognitive age represents how much individuals perceive themselves as younger than they are. This study examines the gap in donation intention based on cognitive age. In order to investigate cognitive age, composed of four sub-categories (feel-age, look-age, do-age, and interest-age), this study explores the differential donation intention based on cognitive age, which determines the relationship between the young age and old age. Research design, data, and methodology – Data research was conducted by gathering 216 survey samples, excluding those with unreliable answers. Data coding and cleaning were used and SPSS 19.0 software for the data analysis. The respondents were categorized into two types, younger cognitive ages and older cognitive ages. Additionally, we analyzed the moderating variables. In particular, we used cognitive age degree and congruency level (cognitive age low vs. cognitive age high) x (congruency close vs. congruency distant) between - subjects design. First, regression was done to verify the difference between chronological age and cognitive age. Second, at-test was done to verify the difference of cognitive age level in donations. Third, ANOVA (analysis of variance) was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and congruency in donations. Last, ANOVA was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and moral judgments in donations. Result – The results show most respondents perceive themselves as younger than their chronological ages. In particular, older respondents feel they are younger than their actual age. Moreover, the result of the comparison between low degree and high degree groups of cognitive age, show high donations at the higher degree of cognitive age groups. In addition, the closer the distance to the beneficiaries, the higher the donation in high degree cognitive age groups. The higher moral judgment groups also show relatively high contributions in lower degree cognitive age groups. Conclusions – Donations belong to the category of pro-social behavior reflecting an individual’s psychological state. Therefore, it is important in understanding cognitive age. This study implies that it is necessary to take into account both cognitive age and chronological age when segmenting donors. Moreover, this study confirmed that there are different factors affecting the motives behind donations. Thus, it may be utilized to create differential donation strategies.

Abstract

Purpose – This research aims to understand the different behaviors of consumers according to cognitive age. Specifically, this research is focused on pro-social behavior. Pro-social behavior is defined as behavior benefiting others, rather than behavior benefiting one’s self. It often entails individual risk or cost, such as when giving resources to others, waiting in line, asking for or paying a fair price, or risking one’s life in battle. Therefore, we sought to understand consumer psychology and cognitive age as a reflection of inner psychology. People frequently perceive themselves as younger or older than their chronological ages. This self-perceived or cognitive age is a subjective age perception independent of actual chronological age. The discrepancy degree between chronological and cognitive age represents how much individuals perceive themselves as younger than they are. This study examines the gap in donation intention based on cognitive age. In order to investigate cognitive age, composed of four sub-categories (feel-age, look-age, do-age, and interest-age), this study explores the differential donation intention based on cognitive age, which determines the relationship between the young age and old age. Research design, data, and methodology – Data research was conducted by gathering 216 survey samples, excluding those with unreliable answers. Data coding and cleaning were used and SPSS 19.0 software for the data analysis. The respondents were categorized into two types, younger cognitive ages and older cognitive ages. Additionally, we analyzed the moderating variables. In particular, we used cognitive age degree and congruency level (cognitive age low vs. cognitive age high) x (congruency close vs. congruency distant) between - subjects design. First, regression was done to verify the difference between chronological age and cognitive age. Second, at-test was done to verify the difference of cognitive age level in donations. Third, ANOVA (analysis of variance) was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and congruency in donations. Last, ANOVA was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and moral judgments in donations. Result – The results show most respondents perceive themselves as younger than their chronological ages. In particular, older respondents feel they are younger than their actual age. Moreover, the result of the comparison between low degree and high degree groups of cognitive age, show high donations at the higher degree of cognitive age groups. In addition, the closer the distance to the beneficiaries, the higher the donation in high degree cognitive age groups. The higher moral judgment groups also show relatively high contributions in lower degree cognitive age groups. Conclusions – Donations belong to the category of pro-social behavior reflecting an individual’s psychological state. Therefore, it is important in understanding cognitive age. This study implies that it is necessary to take into account both cognitive age and chronological age when segmenting donors. Moreover, this study confirmed that there are different factors affecting the motives behind donations. Thus, it may be utilized to create differential donation strategies.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Andreoni, J., "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods : A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving?", Economic Journal, 100, pp.464~477 (1990)
  2. Barak, B., "Cognitive Age: A Nonchronological Age Variable", Advances in Consumer Research, 12, pp.53~58 (1981), Association for Consumer Research
  3. Barak, B., "Subjective Age Correlates : A research note", The Gerontologist, 26, pp.571~578 (1986)
  4. Bargh, J. A., "Attractiveness and Its Consequences for Sexual Harassment and Aggression", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, pp.200~212 (1995)
  5. Batson, D. C., "Four Motives for Community Involvement", Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), pp.429~445 (2002)
  6. Bendapudi, N., "Enhancing Helping Behavior : An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning", Journal of Marketing, 60(3), pp.33~49 (1996)
  7. 부경희, "‘젊은 오빠’ 인식 : 인지연령(Cognitive Age) 인식이 노인세대의 소비행태에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 광고학연구, 16(1), pp.37~66 (2005), 한국광고학회
  8. 최정원, "성인 여성의 주관적 연령과 의복쇼핑성향에 관한 연구", 복식, 60(6), pp.74~88 (2010), 한국복식학회
  9. Chua, C., "The Antecedents of Cognitive Age", Advances in Consumer Research, 17, pp.880~885 (1990)
  10. Dovidio, J. F., "Helping Behavior and Altruism, An Empirical and Conceptual Overview", Advance in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, pp.361~427 (1984)
  11. Glazer, A., "A Signaling Explanation for Charity", American Economic Review, 86(4), pp.1019~1028 (1996)
  12. Goldsmith, R. E., "Subjective Age : A Test of Five Hypotheses", The Gerontologist, 32, pp.312~317 (1992)
  13. Gwinner, K. P., "Testing the Implied Mediational Role of Cognitive Age", Psychology and Marketing, 18(10), pp.1031~1048 (2001)
  14. Haidt, J., "Affect, Culture, and Morality, or is It Wrong to Eat Your Dog?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), pp.613~628 (1993)
  15. Han, Gyu seog, "A Cultural Profile of Korean Society : From Vertical Collectivism to Horizontal Individualism", Koran Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 13(2), pp.293~310 (1999)
  16. Harbaugh, W. T., "The Prestige Motive for Making Charitable Transfers", American Economic Review, 88(2), pp.277~282 (1998)
  17. 홍성태, "인지연령: 소비행동에 미치는 영향 및 매개효과 분석", 소비자학연구, 18(3), pp.63~86 (2007), 한국소비자학회
  18. 황윤용, "젊은세대와 시니어세대간 기부의도에 관한 비교연구 - 심리적 거리와 도덕적 정체성의 조절효과를 중심으로 -", 경영학연구, 42(6), pp.1715~1736 (2013), 한국경영학회
  19. 정정호, "기부중단자의 특성 및 기부행위에 관한 연구", 사회복지연구, (37), pp.241~266 (2008), 한국사회복지연구회
  20. Johnson, E. B., "Cognitive Age: Understanding Consumer Alienation in the Mature Market", Review of Business, 17(3), pp.35~40 (1996)
  21. Kastenbaum, K. G., "The Age of Me : Toward Personal and Interpersonal Definitions of Functional Aging", Aging and Human Development, 3, pp.197~211 (1972)
  22. 김광석, "The Effect of Fair Trade on Consumer Behavior: In Terms of Ethical Consumerism", 경영학연구, 38(1), pp.295~315 (2009), 한국경영학회
  23. Kim, J. E., "The Influence of Moral Emotions in Young Adults' Moral Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Examination", Doctor, pp.2009
  24. Koschate-Fischer, N., "Willing to Pay for Cause-Related Marketing : The Impact of Donation Amount and Moderating Effects", Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), pp.910~927 (2012)
  25. 이정기, "20대의 기부의도에 관한 탐색적 연구: 텔레비전 장르별 시청량, 가치성향, 계획행동이론 변인을 중심으로", 미디어, 젠더 & 문화, 20(20), pp.173~205 (2011), 한국여성커뮤니케이션학회
  26. Mael, F., "Alumni and Their Alma Mater : A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), pp.103~123 (1992)
  27. Markus, H. R., "Culture and Self:Implication for Cognitions, Emotion, and Motivation", Psychological Review, 98(2), pp.224~253 (1981)
  28. Micklewright, J., "Who Gives Charitable Donations for Overseas Development?", Journal of Social Policy, 38(2), pp.317~341 (2009)
  29. Montepare, J. M., "You're Only as Old as You Feel : Self-Perceptions of Age, Fears of Aging, and the Life Satisfaction from Adolescence to Old Age", Psychology and Aging, 4, pp.73~78 (1989)
  30. Monterpare, J. M., "Person Perception Comes of Age : The Salience and Significance of Age in Social Judgements", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, pp.93~161 (1998)
  31. Mount, J., "Why Donors Give", Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(1), pp.3~14 (1996)
  32. 박광희, "인지연령에 관한 선행연구 고찰", 한국의류산업학회지, 14(1), pp.48~55 (2012), 한국의류산업학회
  33. Peter G. R., "Self-conceptions of Aged, Age-Identification and Aging", The Gerontologist, 11, pp.69~73 (1971)
  34. Rajan, S. S., "Socio-Democracy and Personality Characteristics of Canadian Donors Contribution to International Charity", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, pp.413~440 (2008)
  35. Schervish, P. G., "Social Participation and Charitable Giving : A Multivarate Analysis", Voluntas : International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(3), pp.235~260 (1997)
  36. Sherman, E., "Marketing: A Return to the Broader Dimensions", pp.319~320 (1988), American Marketing Association
  37. Simmon, H. A., "What is an Explanation of Behavior?", Psychological Science, 3, pp.150~161 (1992)
  38. Skinner, B. F., "Skinner Beyond Freedom and Dignity" (1971), Knopf
  39. Strong, C., "The Problems of Translating Fair Trade Principles into Consumer Purchase Behaviour", Marketing Intelligence and Planning Journal, 15(1), pp.32~37 (1997)
  40. Tan, B., "Understanding Consumer Ethical Decision Making with Respect to Purchase of Pirated Software", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(2), pp.96~111 (2002)
  41. Typper, K., "The Role of Labeling Process in Elderly Consumer's Response to Age Segmentation Cue", Journal of Consumer Research, 20, pp.503~518 (1994)
  42. Van Slyke, D. M., "Why Do People Give? New Evidence and Strategics for Nonprofit Managers", The American Review of Public Administration, 35(3), pp.199~222 (2005)
  43. Walker, M. C., "Marketing to Seniors" (2004), First, Books Library
  44. Ward, R. A., "The Impact of Subjective Age and Stigma in Older Persons", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1, pp.18~27 (1977)
  45. Westerhof, G. J., "Forever Young? A Comparison of Age Identities in the United States and Germany", Research on Aging, 25(4), pp.366~383 (2003)
  46. Winter, K., "Market Segmentation: A Tactical Approach", Business Horizons, pp.57~59 (1984)
  47. Winterich, K. P., "Donation Behavior Toward In-Groups and Out-Groups: The Role of Gender and Moral Identity", Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (2009)
  48. Wright, L. T., "Fair Trade Marketing: an Exploration Through Qualitative Research", Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14, pp.411~426 (2006)
  49. 최성, "실버 제품의 거부감에 관한 연구 - 전동 휠체어를 통한 검증 -", 감성과학, 13(2), pp.317~326 (2010), 한국감성과학회
  50. Yi, Jonghan, "The psycho-social characteristics of Korean adults : Collectivist and moving toward individualist", Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 6(3), pp.201~219 (2000)
  51. Ying, B., "Consumption Patterns of Chinese Elders : Evidence from a Survey in Wuhan, China", Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(4), pp.702~714 (2006)
  52. Yoon, You-Kyung, "A Review of Subjective Age Perception", Korean Journal of Psychology, 19(1), pp.61~78 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)