Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To analyze the fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro. Methods: Roots of human mandibular central incisors were covered with silicone, mimicking the periodontal ligament, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. The specimens (N = 50), with two teeth each, were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10/group) according to the retainer materials: (1) Interlig (E-glass), (2) everStick Ortho (E-glass), (3) DentaPreg Splint (S2-glass), (4) Ribbond (polyethylene), and (5) Quad Cat wire (stainless steel). After the recommended adhesive procedures, the retainers were bonded to the teeth by using flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow). The teeth were subjected to 10,00,000 cyclic loads (8 Hz, 3 - 100 N, 45o angle, under 37 ± 3oC water) at their incisoproximal contact, and debonding forces were measured with a universal testing machine (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Failure sites were examined under a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Results: All the specimens survived the cyclic loading. Their mean debonding forces were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The DentaPreg Splint group (80%) showed the highest incidence of complete adhesive debonding, followed by the Interlig group (60%). The everStick Ortho group (80%) presented predominantly partial adhesive debonding. The Quad Cat wire group (50%) presented overlying composite detachment. Conclusions: Cyclic loading did not cause debonding. The retainers presented similar debonding forces but different failure types. Braided stainless steel wire retainers presented the most repairable failure type.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro. Methods: Roots of human mandibular central incisors were covered with silicone, mimicking the periodontal ligament, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. The specimens (N = 50), with two teeth each, were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10/group) according to the retainer materials: (1) Interlig (E-glass), (2) everStick Ortho (E-glass), (3) DentaPreg Splint (S2-glass), (4) Ribbond (polyethylene), and (5) Quad Cat wire (stainless steel). After the recommended adhesive procedures, the retainers were bonded to the teeth by using flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow). The teeth were subjected to 10,00,000 cyclic loads (8 Hz, 3 - 100 N, 45o angle, under 37 ± 3oC water) at their incisoproximal contact, and debonding forces were measured with a universal testing machine (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Failure sites were examined under a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Results: All the specimens survived the cyclic loading. Their mean debonding forces were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The DentaPreg Splint group (80%) showed the highest incidence of complete adhesive debonding, followed by the Interlig group (60%). The everStick Ortho group (80%) presented predominantly partial adhesive debonding. The Quad Cat wire group (50%) presented overlying composite detachment. Conclusions: Cyclic loading did not cause debonding. The retainers presented similar debonding forces but different failure types. Braided stainless steel wire retainers presented the most repairable failure type.
참고문헌 (26)
- Renkema AM, "Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.614~621 (2011)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)
- Dahl EH, "Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers", J Clin Orthod, 25, pp.619~630 (1991)
- Artun J, "A 3-year followup study of various types of orthodontic canine-tocanine retainers", Eur J Orthod, 19, pp.501~509 (1997)
- Littlewood SJ, "Orthodontic retention: a systematic review", J Orthod, 33, pp.205~212 (2006)
- Burstone CJ, "Fiber-reinforced composites in orthodontics", J Clin Orthod, 34, pp.271~279 (2000)
- Foek DL, "Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites", J Adhes Dent, 11, pp.381~390 (2009)
- Lumsden KW, "Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers", Br J Orthod, 26, pp.191~194 (1999)
- Lie Sam Foek DJ, "Survival of flexible, braided, bonded stainless steel lingual retainers: a historic cohort study", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.199~204 (2008)
- Lee KD, "Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.502~506 (2009)
- Taner T, "A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival", Eur J Orthod, 34, pp.470~474 (2012)
- Cooke ME, "Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.741~746 (2010)
- Rose E, "Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention", Quintessence Int, 33, pp.579~583 (2002)
- Tacken MP, "Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.117~123 (2010)
- Bolla E, "Failure evaluation after a 6-year retention period : a comparison between glass fiber-reinforced(GFR)and multistranded bonded retainers", Int Orthod, 10, pp.16~28 (2012)
- Kumbuloglu O, "Pilot study of unidirectional E-glass fibre-reinforced composite resin splints: up to 4.5-year clinical follow-up", J Dent, 39, pp.871~877 (2011)
- Meiers JC, "The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.388~393 (2003)
- Scribante A, "Effect of various adhesive systems on the shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.224~227 (2006)
- Fokkinga WA, "Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars", Int Endod J, 38, pp.230~237 (2005)
- Ozcan M, "Fracture strength of endodontically- treated teeth restored with post and cores and composite cores only", Oper Dent, 34, pp.429~436 (2009)
- Baldissara P, "Effect of cyclic loading on fracture strength and microleakage of a quartz fiber dowel with different adhesive, cement and resin core material combinations", Minerva Stomatol, 59, pp.407~414 (2010)
- McCabe JF, "Alternative approaches to evaluating the fatigue characteristics of materials", Dent Mater, 6, pp.24~28 (1990)
- Ruse ND, "In vitro fatigue testing of a dental bonding system on enamel", J Biomed Mater Res, 29, pp.411~415 (1995)
- Grandini S, "Fatigue resistance and structural integrity of different types of fiber posts", Dent Mater J, 27, pp.687~694 (2008)
- Sahafi A, "Resistance to cyclic loading of teeth restored with posts", Clin Oral Investig, 9, pp.84~90 (2005)
- De Munck J, "A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results", J Dent Res, 84, pp.118~132 (2005)