Direct and indirect bonding of wire retainers to bovine enamel using three resin systems: shear bond strength comparisons
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: We compared the shear bond strength (SBS) of lingual retainers bonded to bovine enamel with three different resins using direct and indirect methods. Methods: Both ends of pre-fabricated twisted ligature wires were bonded to bovine enamel surfaces using Light-Core, Tetric N-Flow, or Transbond XT. Phosphoric acid-etched enamel surfaces were primed with One-Step prior to bonding with Light-Core or Tetric N-Flow. Transbond XT primer was used prior to bonding with Transbond XT. After 24 hours in water at 37oC, we performed SBS tests on the samples. We also assigned adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding and predicted the clinical performance of materials and bonding techniques from Weibull analyses. Results: Direct bonding produced significantly higher SBS values than indirect bonding for all materials. The SBS for Light-Core was significantly higher than that for Tetric N-Flow, and there was no significant difference between the direct bonding SBS of Transbond XT and that of Light-Core. Weibull analysis indicated Light-Core performed better than other indirectly bonded resins. Conclusions: When the SBS of a wire retainer is of primary concern, direct bonding methods are superior to indirect bonding methods. Light-Core may perform better than Transbond XT or Tetric N-Flow when bonded indirectly.
Abstract
Objective: We compared the shear bond strength (SBS) of lingual retainers bonded to bovine enamel with three different resins using direct and indirect methods. Methods: Both ends of pre-fabricated twisted ligature wires were bonded to bovine enamel surfaces using Light-Core, Tetric N-Flow, or Transbond XT. Phosphoric acid-etched enamel surfaces were primed with One-Step prior to bonding with Light-Core or Tetric N-Flow. Transbond XT primer was used prior to bonding with Transbond XT. After 24 hours in water at 37oC, we performed SBS tests on the samples. We also assigned adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding and predicted the clinical performance of materials and bonding techniques from Weibull analyses. Results: Direct bonding produced significantly higher SBS values than indirect bonding for all materials. The SBS for Light-Core was significantly higher than that for Tetric N-Flow, and there was no significant difference between the direct bonding SBS of Transbond XT and that of Light-Core. Weibull analysis indicated Light-Core performed better than other indirectly bonded resins. Conclusions: When the SBS of a wire retainer is of primary concern, direct bonding methods are superior to indirect bonding methods. Light-Core may perform better than Transbond XT or Tetric N-Flow when bonded indirectly.
참고문헌 (27)
- Little RM, "Serial extraction of first premolars--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse", Angle Orthod, 60, pp.255~262 (1990)
- Little RM, "Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97, pp.393~404 (1990)
- Little RM, "An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.423~428 (1988)
- Littlewood SJ, "Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 25, pp.CD002283~ (2006)
- Sadowsky C, "Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106, pp.243~249 (1994)
- Zachrisson BU, "Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers", Am J Orthod, 71, pp.440~448 (1977)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.67~74 (1997)
- Sondhi A, "Efficient and effective indirect bonding", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.352~359 (1999)
- Zachrisson BU, "Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives", Am J Orthod, 74, pp.62~78 (1978)
- Sinha PK, "Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.302~307 (1995)
- Cadenaro M, "Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction", Dent Mater, 25, pp.649~654 (2009)
- Albers HF, "Tooth-colored restoratives: principles and techniques. 9th ed", pp.111~125 (2002), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker
- Uysal T, "Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.941~946 (2008)
- Ryou DB, "Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.1105~1109 (2008)
- Toroglu MS, "Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134(181), pp.e1~7 (2008)
- Isci D, "Effects of fluorosis on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer", Eur J Orthod, 33, pp.161~166 (2011)
- Aguirre MJ, "Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.269~276 (1982)
- Hocevar RA, "Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 94, pp.367~371 (1988)
- Yi GK, "Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.577~581 (2003)
- Martin S, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106, pp.615~620 (1994)
- Bishara SE, "Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.24~28 (1999)
- Elekdag-Turk S, "Thermocycling effects on shear bond strength of a self-etching primer", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.351~356 (2008)
- McCabe JF, "The treatment of results for tensile bond strength testing", J Dent, 14, pp.165~168 (1986)
- Suh BI, "Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry", J Esthet Restor Dent, 16, pp.316~323 (2004)
- Fox NA, "A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics", Br J Orthod, 21, pp.33~43 (1994)
- Oesterle LJ, "The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.514~519 (1998)