Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Methods: We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-ABraid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire. Results: Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was signifi cantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was signifi cantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was signifi cantly higher for fi ve-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Methods: We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-ABraid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire. Results: Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was signifi cantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was signifi cantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was signifi cantly higher for fi ve-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.
참고문헌 (23)
- Am J Orthod, "Maturation of untreated normal occlusions", Am J Orthod, 83, pp.114~123 (1983)
- Bishara SE, "Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age", Angle Orthod, 66, pp.417~422 (1996)
- Little RM, "Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics", Am J Orthod, 80, pp.349~365 (1981)
- Parker WS, "Retention--retainers may be forever", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95, pp.505~513 (1989)
- Durbin DD, "Relapse and the need for permanent fi xed retention", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.723~727 (2001)
- Cerny R, "Permanent fixed lingual retention", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.728~732 (2001)
- Booth FA, "Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandi bular canine-to-canine retainers", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.70~76 (2008)
- Dahl EH, "Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers", J Clin Orthod, 25, pp.619~630 (1991)
- Zachrisson BU, "The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth", Swed Dent J Suppl, 15, pp.247~255 (1982)
- Bryan DC, "An in vitro comparison between a bonded retainer system and a directly bonded flexible spiral wire retainer", Eur J Orthod, 17, pp.143~151 (1995)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.207~213 (1995)
- Cooke ME, "Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.741~746 (2010)
- Artun J, "The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.143~148 (1988)
- Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.67~74 (1997)
- Lumsden KW, "Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers", Br J Orthod, 26, pp.191~194 (1999)
- Lie Sam Foek DJ, "Survival of flexible, braided, bonded stainless steel lingual retainers: a historic cohort study", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.199~204 (2008)
- Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.333~340 (1984)
- Oliver RG, "The eff ect of diff erent methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.196~200 (1988)
- Al Yami EA, "Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.300~304 (1999)
- Aldrees AM, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations", J Orofac Orthop, 71, pp.290~299 (2010)
- Zachrisson BU, "Long-term experience with directbonded retainers: update and clinical advice", J Clin Orthod, 41, pp.728~737 (2007)
- Radlanski RJ, "Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength", J Orofac Orthop, 65, pp.321~335 (2004)
- Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding", Br J Orthod, 2, pp.171~178 (1975)